Thanks Obama! You May Have Saved Us

[SNAFUBARIFIC]

In other words, you can't prove it.

Again, I don't care if you think that. You do so at your own peril.

If you could prove it you would have done so.

Who do you think you're fooling?

Whatever you say. Again, I don't care if you take my word for it or not.



So, moving on...do you find this to be likely true, or no?:

"Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing e-mail messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to the WikiLeaks platform."

"

That was weird...I replied to your post, and it ended up as part of the drop down...let's try it again...

THAT is what Wasserman-Schultz and the rest of them get for setting "PASSWORD" and "123456" as their passwords...hopefully these folks have little to do with national security...?

In the Military...we used to call it OPSEC...

Thats bullshit. You can enforce password policies via the admin.

Better tell THEM that...

The DNC used incredibly weak passwords like 'obamain08'

 

[blackhawk]

Everybody will cheer until it's done to them that is what is truly scary what everyone will look the other way for depending on who the target is and how we feel about them. Just remember if you feel the end justifies the means when it's those who disagree with that same standard can and will be applied to those who agree with so be sure this is a slippery slope you want to go down because when you do there is no turning back from it.

 

[Kilroy2]

#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.

You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

 

[Oddball]

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

 

[bripat9643]

#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.

You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

 

[Kilroy2]

#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.

You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.

You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

Its almost like looking in the mirror you claim it to be false but you offer no proof yet everything that I wrote is available if you want to know the truth
but I would suspect that you don't.

Mueller has gotten confession of guilt, two trials that ended in guilt and indictments and is about to close down the big cheese himself.

So Sleep tight don't let the bed bugs bite

You still have Pence

 

[SweetSue92]

Not odd at all, if you're actually a freedom-loving American. First.

1. STILL no proof Trump did anything even remotely illegal. Because guess what? Leaders of the free world are allowed to meet with other leaders of the free world

AND

2. You bet bureaucrats who are doing the SAME THING you want to accuse Trump of doing are downright scary. Do you forget these are law enforcement? Who you want to give the power to spy and accuse without trial, without due process. Banana Republic style, as long as Orange Man Bad is caught in the trap somehow.

Shame on the lot of you, what a shady joke you all are. Nothing "liberal" about you authoritarians at all

Mueller will supply proof if it exists.

.....chanted just like the mindless incantation it has become. Naturally.

You mean like ‘lock her up’ and ‘build the wall’? Those kinds of mindless incantations?

I’m gonna have fun with you, little wingnut. You suck at this.

Sweetheart, I quit the Left before you were even born.

WTF does that have to do with anything?

I understand how you think.

You do not understand how we think.

Obviously.

 

[bripat9643]

#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.

You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.

You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

Its almost like looking in the mirror you claim it to be false but you offer no proof yet everything that I wrote is available if you want to know the truth
but I would suspect that you don't.

Mueller has gotten confession of guilt, two trials that ended in guilt and indictments and is about to close down the big cheese himself.

So Sleep tight don't let the bed bugs bite

You still have Pence

If it's available on the internet, then post the parts that prove your claim. You don't do that because you know it's horseshit. That's how this logic thing works. You make a claim, and then you post the evidence to support it. With snowflakes it always ends at the making a claim part.

None of the so-called Mueller "confessions" and "trials" have anything to do with collusion. They're a side show in Mueller's circus to make it look like he's doing something. All he's really doing is persecuting people who were harming no one. Mueller is conducting a witch hunt. Of that there is no doubt.

 

[BULLDOG]

Mueller will supply proof if it exists.

.....chanted just like the mindless incantation it has become. Naturally.

You mean like ‘lock her up’ and ‘build the wall’? Those kinds of mindless incantations?

I’m gonna have fun with you, little wingnut. You suck at this.

Sweetheart, I quit the Left before you were even born.

WTF does that have to do with anything?

I understand how you think.

You do not understand how we think.

Obviously.

No. You have no idea how a liberal thinks. You understand what Rush and Hannity et.al told you about what we think, but they lie a lot.

 

[SweetSue92]

.....chanted just like the mindless incantation it has become. Naturally.

You mean like ‘lock her up’ and ‘build the wall’? Those kinds of mindless incantations?

I’m gonna have fun with you, little wingnut. You suck at this.

Sweetheart, I quit the Left before you were even born.

WTF does that have to do with anything?

I understand how you think.

You do not understand how we think.

Obviously.

No. You have no idea how a liberal thinks. You understand what Rush and Hannity et.al told you about what we think, but they lie a lot.

Sweetheart I was a liberal feminist secular humanist Democrat. In my first primary I voted for Jesse Jackson. So don't tell me I don't understand.

I was "WalkAway" before walk away was cool. And I didn't walk. Once I caught scent of the utter hypocrisy, I ran, pretty much screaming. And I never looked back. 20 years now.

ETA: Pro-choice war protesting liberal, too. I don't want to forget that part.

 

[BULLDOG]

You mean like ‘lock her up’ and ‘build the wall’? Those kinds of mindless incantations?

I’m gonna have fun with you, little wingnut. You suck at this.

Sweetheart, I quit the Left before you were even born.

WTF does that have to do with anything?

I understand how you think.

You do not understand how we think.

Obviously.

No. You have no idea how a liberal thinks. You understand what Rush and Hannity et.al told you about what we think, but they lie a lot.

Sweetheart I was a liberal feminist secular humanist Democrat. In my first primary I voted for Jesse Jackson. So don't tell me I don't understand.

I was "WalkAway" before walk away was cool. And I didn't walk. Once I caught scent of the utter hypocrisy, I ran, pretty much screaming. And I never looked back. 20 years now.

You realize walkaway was never a real thing don't you? It was just another lie produced by the Trump supporter / Russia team

 

[SweetSue92]

Sweetheart, I quit the Left before you were even born.

WTF does that have to do with anything?

I understand how you think.

You do not understand how we think.

Obviously.

No. You have no idea how a liberal thinks. You understand what Rush and Hannity et.al told you about what we think, but they lie a lot.

Sweetheart I was a liberal feminist secular humanist Democrat. In my first primary I voted for Jesse Jackson. So don't tell me I don't understand.

I was "WalkAway" before walk away was cool. And I didn't walk. Once I caught scent of the utter hypocrisy, I ran, pretty much screaming. And I never looked back. 20 years now.

You realize walkaway was never a real thing don't you? It was just another lie produced by the Trump supporter / Russia team

That's something I would have believed too.

When I was a brainwashed liberal.

 

[BULLDOG]

WTF does that have to do with anything?

I understand how you think.

You do not understand how we think.

Obviously.

No. You have no idea how a liberal thinks. You understand what Rush and Hannity et.al told you about what we think, but they lie a lot.

Sweetheart I was a liberal feminist secular humanist Democrat. In my first primary I voted for Jesse Jackson. So don't tell me I don't understand.

I was "WalkAway" before walk away was cool. And I didn't walk. Once I caught scent of the utter hypocrisy, I ran, pretty much screaming. And I never looked back. 20 years now.

You realize walkaway was never a real thing don't you? It was just another lie produced by the Trump supporter / Russia team

That's something I would have believed too.

When I was a brainwashed liberal.

I understand. Reality just isn't your thing.

 

[SweetSue92]

I understand how you think.

You do not understand how we think.

Obviously.

No. You have no idea how a liberal thinks. You understand what Rush and Hannity et.al told you about what we think, but they lie a lot.

Sweetheart I was a liberal feminist secular humanist Democrat. In my first primary I voted for Jesse Jackson. So don't tell me I don't understand.

I was "WalkAway" before walk away was cool. And I didn't walk. Once I caught scent of the utter hypocrisy, I ran, pretty much screaming. And I never looked back. 20 years now.

You realize walkaway was never a real thing don't you? It was just another lie produced by the Trump supporter / Russia team

That's something I would have believed too.

When I was a brainwashed liberal.

I understand. Reality just isn't your thing.

You have farmed out your thinking to Overlords. I do understand. It's pathetic, but it happens a lot. The people who craft your thinking for you are very, very good at what they do. Very good.

 

[SNAFUBARIFIC]

Obummer DID save us...from HILLARY!!!

THANKS, Barry....

 

[BULLDOG]

No. You have no idea how a liberal thinks. You understand what Rush and Hannity et.al told you about what we think, but they lie a lot.

Sweetheart I was a liberal feminist secular humanist Democrat. In my first primary I voted for Jesse Jackson. So don't tell me I don't understand.

I was "WalkAway" before walk away was cool. And I didn't walk. Once I caught scent of the utter hypocrisy, I ran, pretty much screaming. And I never looked back. 20 years now.

You realize walkaway was never a real thing don't you? It was just another lie produced by the Trump supporter / Russia team

That's something I would have believed too.

When I was a brainwashed liberal.

I understand. Reality just isn't your thing.

You have farmed out your thinking to Overlords. I do understand. It's pathetic, but it happens a lot. The people who craft your thinking for you are very, very good at what they do. Very good.

Funny to hear, especially coming from the fox bubble.

 

[SweetSue92]

Sweetheart I was a liberal feminist secular humanist Democrat. In my first primary I voted for Jesse Jackson. So don't tell me I don't understand.

I was "WalkAway" before walk away was cool. And I didn't walk. Once I caught scent of the utter hypocrisy, I ran, pretty much screaming. And I never looked back. 20 years now.

You realize walkaway was never a real thing don't you? It was just another lie produced by the Trump supporter / Russia team

That's something I would have believed too.

When I was a brainwashed liberal.

I understand. Reality just isn't your thing.

You have farmed out your thinking to Overlords. I do understand. It's pathetic, but it happens a lot. The people who craft your thinking for you are very, very good at what they do. Very good.

Funny to hear, especially coming from the fox bubble.

Let me guess: you don't watch Fox, right? But I do watch Fox and CNN and MSNBC. The latter two make me sick, the talking points are so well-rehearsed and clearly written by Overlords. But I do watch, and not rarely.

But you're very good at spewing the Points, Bulldog. I'll give you that.

 

[BULLDOG]

You realize walkaway was never a real thing don't you? It was just another lie produced by the Trump supporter / Russia team

That's something I would have believed too.

When I was a brainwashed liberal.

I understand. Reality just isn't your thing.

You have farmed out your thinking to Overlords. I do understand. It's pathetic, but it happens a lot. The people who craft your thinking for you are very, very good at what they do. Very good.

Funny to hear, especially coming from the fox bubble.

Let me guess: you don't watch Fox, right? But I do watch Fox and CNN and MSNBC. The latter two make me sick, the talking points are so well-rehearsed and clearly written by Overlords. But I do watch, and not rarely.

But you're very good at spewing the Points, Bulldog. I'll give you that.

Oh I do watch fox. I can't take it in large doses, but I do watch it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Twitter thread from the anonymous, but highly regarded The Hoarse Whisperer. It starts getting good around the 15th tweet.

The Hoarse Whisperer on Twitter

But here’s the Obama part.


View attachment 239816
View attachment 239815

A little fascism never hurt anyone!

 

[BULLDOG]

You realize walkaway was never a real thing don't you? It was just another lie produced by the Trump supporter / Russia team

That's something I would have believed too.

When I was a brainwashed liberal.

I understand. Reality just isn't your thing.

You have farmed out your thinking to Overlords. I do understand. It's pathetic, but it happens a lot. The people who craft your thinking for you are very, very good at what they do. Very good.

Funny to hear, especially coming from the fox bubble.

Let me guess: you don't watch Fox, right? But I do watch Fox and CNN and MSNBC. The latter two make me sick, the talking points are so well-rehearsed and clearly written by Overlords. But I do watch, and not rarely.

But you're very good at spewing the Points, Bulldog. I'll give you that.

I never argue anything that I don't believe.