Thanks Obama! You May Have Saved Us

[Fort Fun Indiana]

None of the Steele report has been corroborated

Of course, that's wrong.

"Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing e-mail messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to the WikiLeaks platform."

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So, Trump's NSA can see which of the Mexican child traffickers are funding democrats?

 

[theHawk]

Twitter thread from the anonymous, but highly regarded The Hoarse Whisperer. It starts getting good around the 15th tweet.

The Hoarse Whisperer on Twitter

But here’s the Obama part.


View attachment 239816
View attachment 239815

And yet despite all the spying he ordered on his political enemy, the Hussein and his minions came up with zilch.

 

[leftwinger]

Sorry you changed your vote. Need to be stronger minded like me. Better luck next time in 2020. Ginsberg hangs by a chad....

My last comment on this until you show facts.

 

[Shrimpbox]

Next to none one of it has been shown to be true....Stupidity on your level should be physically painful...A tragedy it isn't.

It's always so easy to show what a fool you are, Oddball. Don’t go changin’.

A Lot of the Steele Report Has Since Been Corroborated

Here's what's true in the infamous Trump-Russia dossier

You quote an extreme left wing site to buttress your argument. Typical liberal move to state a falsehood and then reference that falsehood as fact.

Slate

 

[Synthaholic]

Next to none one of it has been shown to be true....Stupidity on your level should be physically painful...A tragedy it isn't.

It's always so easy to show what a fool you are, Oddball. Don’t go changin’.

A Lot of the Steele Report Has Since Been Corroborated

Here's what's true in the infamous Trump-Russia dossier

You quote an extreme left wing site to buttress your argument. Typical liberal move to state a falsehood and then reference that falsehood as fact.

Slate

So you can’t disprove their reporting?

I win again!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You quote an extreme left wing site to buttress your argument.

But you didn't read or respond to a word of it, so your dismissal is lazy and meaningless.

 

[bripat9643]

None of the Steele report has been corroborated

Of course, that's wrong.

"Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing e-mail messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to the WikiLeaks platform."

That certainly hasn't been proven. You're a ******* moron.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That certainly hasn't been proven.

Of course it has.What a bizarre thing for you to vomit.

 

[bripat9643]

That certainly hasn't been proven.

Of course it has.What a bizarre thing for you to vomit.

Really? Where's the proof?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That certainly hasn't been proven.

Of course it has.What a bizarre thing for you to vomit.

Really? Where's the proof?

I don't care if you take my word for it or not. I am not your mommy and am not going to to spoonfeed this to you.

 

[bripat9643]

That certainly hasn't been proven.

Of course it has.What a bizarre thing for you to vomit.

Really? Where's the proof?

I don't care if you take my word for it or not. I am not your mommy and am not going to to spoonfeed this to you.

In other words, you can't prove it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That certainly hasn't been proven.

Of course it has.What a bizarre thing for you to vomit.

Really? Where's the proof?

I don't care if you take my word for it or not. I am not your mommy and am not going to to spoonfeed this to you.

In other words, you can't prove it.

Again, I don't care if you think that. You do so at your own peril.

 

[Asclepias]

Slate and Newsweak?!?

Yeah, why doesn't he cite one of your awesome sources, like Breitbart and zero-hedge?

They are far more credible than Slate or Newsweek.

Maybe on Opposite Day.

 

[bripat9643]

That certainly hasn't been proven.

Of course it has.What a bizarre thing for you to vomit.

Really? Where's the proof?

I don't care if you take my word for it or not. I am not your mommy and am not going to to spoonfeed this to you.

In other words, you can't prove it.

Again, I don't care if you think that. You do so at your own peril.

If you could prove it you would have done so.

Who do you think you're fooling?

 

[SNAFUBARIFIC]

During Obummer's Reign of Error...I almost...ALMOST...wished it was 1977 again...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Of course it has.What a bizarre thing for you to vomit.

Really? Where's the proof?

I don't care if you take my word for it or not. I am not your mommy and am not going to to spoonfeed this to you.

In other words, you can't prove it.

Again, I don't care if you think that. You do so at your own peril.

If you could prove it you would have done so.

Who do you think you're fooling?

Whatever you say. Again, I don't care if you take my word for it or not.



So, moving on...do you find this to be likely true, or no?:

"Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing e-mail messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to the WikiLeaks platform."

"

 

[bripat9643]

Really? Where's the proof?

I don't care if you take my word for it or not. I am not your mommy and am not going to to spoonfeed this to you.

In other words, you can't prove it.

Again, I don't care if you think that. You do so at your own peril.

If you could prove it you would have done so.

Who do you think you're fooling?

Whatever you say. Again, I don't care if you take my word for it or not.



So, moving on...do you find this to be likely true, or no?:

"Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing e-mail messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to the WikiLeaks platform."

"

It's obvious horseshit.

 

[SNAFUBARIFIC]

Really? Where's the proof?

I don't care if you take my word for it or not. I am not your mommy and am not going to to spoonfeed this to you.

In other words, you can't prove it.

Again, I don't care if you think that. You do so at your own peril.

If you could prove it you would have done so.

Who do you think you're fooling?

Whatever you say. Again, I don't care if you take my word for it or not.



So, moving on...do you find this to be likely true, or no?:

"Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing e-mail messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to the WikiLeaks platform."

"

That was weird...I replied to your post, and it ended up as part of the drop down...let's try it again...

THAT is what Wasserman-Schultz and the rest of them get for setting "PASSWORD" and "123456" as their passwords...hopefully these folks have little to do with national security...?

In the Military...we used to call it OPSEC...

 

[Asclepias]

I don't care if you take my word for it or not. I am not your mommy and am not going to to spoonfeed this to you.

In other words, you can't prove it.

Again, I don't care if you think that. You do so at your own peril.

If you could prove it you would have done so.

Who do you think you're fooling?

Whatever you say. Again, I don't care if you take my word for it or not.



So, moving on...do you find this to be likely true, or no?:

"Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing e-mail messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to the WikiLeaks platform."

"

That was weird...I replied to your post, and it ended up as part of the drop down...let's try it again...

THAT is what Wasserman-Schultz and the rest of them get for setting "PASSWORD" and "123456" as their passwords...hopefully these folks have little to do with national security...?

In the Military...we used to call it OPSEC...

Thats bullshit. You can enforce password policies via the admin.