Text began coming in to Meadows on January 6th, begging trump to stop the Capitol attack

๐Ÿ–•๐Ÿ–•๐Ÿ–•๐Ÿ–•
wedding-crashers-will-ferrell.gif
 
No, suspect, because if she heard correctly, then the so-called firsthand witnesses were not telling the truth. That doesn't mean she deliberately lied, it just means that if we want to know what really happened, we don't ask her, and quite frankly, there's no good reason for her to recount the story in the first place.
So the story is incomplete then. Got it.
Why are all these Trump folks lying anyway?
 
So the story is incomplete then. Got it.
Why are all these Trump folks lying anyway?
If it is that incomplete, it should not have been brought up in the hearing. The holes in the story should have been enough for it to have been a media leak instead of sworn testimony.
 
If it is that incomplete, it should not have been brought up in the hearing. The holes in the story should have been enough for it to have been a media leak instead of sworn testimony.
There are no holes. It is what it is. It will be addressed one way or the other in future testimony.
 
There are no holes. It is what it is. It will be addressed one way or the other in future testimony.
The biggest hole is that she swore she was told he was in the Beast, when we're told by other sources he was in an SUV. That alone makes it questionable, because it's not an easy mistake to make.
 
The biggest hole is that she swore she was told he was in the Beast, when we're told by other sources he was in an SUV. That alone makes it questionable, because it's not an easy mistake to make.
Itโ€™s not a hole. Sheโ€™s simply relating what she was told by Ornato. Heโ€™s the only one who can speak to that.
Why are Trump folks lying to you?
 
Itโ€™s not a hole. Sheโ€™s simply relating what she was told by Ornato. Heโ€™s the only one who can speak to that.
Why are Trump folks lying to you?
Uhhh, yeah, if she is repeating accurately what she was told, and she's under oath, remember, that's a hole in the story. It doesn't directly impact her credibility but underscores the weakness of hearsay when the credibility of statements needs to be ascertained. It casts doubt on the story that the person claiming it happened has that wrong.
 

But hours went by before trump did anything.
It wasn't an attack. They weren't even armed and the only person shot was an unarmed woman. The BLM riots were attacks...

we are supposed to believe that the Jan. 6 Capitol riots were the worst attack on American democracy since the Civil War, worse than 9/11, the president told us, and the rioters must be treated as terrorists on par with ISIS.

Yet, as RealClearInvestigations has found, the 2020 BLM riots resulted in โ€œ15 times more injured police officers, 30 times as many arrests, and estimated damages in dollar terms up to 1,300 times more costly than those of the Capitol riot.โ€
 
Why are you a lying sack of shit. That is the real question.
 
No one in the secret service would use a term such as the beast because it doesn't exist.
 
Uhhh, yeah, if she is repeating accurately what she was told, and she's under oath, remember, that's a hole in the story. It doesn't directly impact her credibility but underscores the weakness of hearsay when the credibility of statements needs to be ascertained. It casts doubt on the story that the person claiming it happened has that wrong.
Youโ€™re aware that these are all Trump people youโ€™re impugning, right? These arenโ€™t never Trumpers or Dems.
 

Forum List

Back
Top