protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 59,707
- 20,252
- 2,250
They have the US Constitution as standing. the best standing you can get, and highly unlikely for the SCOTUS to go against it.They have no standing.
Their accusations have been litigated already...and the rulings shot their accusations down already.
They waited way too long,
And precedent was set a long long time ago, with the executive and judicial involvement in elections without going through the legislatures.... in all states, including Texas itself.
Also, no state can tell another state how to run their elections and demand all their citizen's votes should be discarded. We are a democratic Republic...we the people, choose our leaders.... our leaders, do not get to choose the voters.
Plus, every election...some state, could choose to sue another State for simply partisan purpose, as this one is...and THAT is NOT how we choose our leaders in a democracy, we the voter, does the choosing, NOT the courts. Part of a great democracy, is the peaceful transfer of power, between oppositions.
The only case I know of "executive and judicial involvement in elections without going through the legislatures" (a clear Violation of US Constitution Article 2, Section 1) is Pennsylvania's Act 77, which is a sitting duck for the SCOTUS to knock it down like a bunch of bowling pins.
But we will see in the next few days.
