Televangelist Rails Against Children Who Marched for Life

Since no one has brought it up: This was not a "March for life". This was a march against the 2nd amendment.

The March For Life, the same sickos support killing the most innocent as they slumber in the womb, how can they support Life?

IBbfDvyVTZGzwClG7zRvSQ.png
 
Republicans feel children should be target practice and not heard.
 
Since no one has brought it up: This was not a "March for life". This was a march against the 2nd amendment.

The March For Life, the same sickos support killing the most innocent as they slumber in the womb, how can they support Life?

IBbfDvyVTZGzwClG7zRvSQ.png
How many of those children have you adopted?

How can someone adopt an aborted baby? Of course I realise this is from you rdean and that you are not in possession of all your faculties.

I have four kidlets of my own, this will be five in mid-September.
 
Since no one has brought it up: This was not a "March for life". This was a march against the 2nd amendment.

No,it was a March for common sense gun control.

Weird! You think that March was funny?

The Pope doesn’t!

Francis is a Neo-Marxist who has preached Liberation Theology for decades, who cares what he thinks, and I'm a Roman Catholic so Francis can fuck off already hopefully soon we'll get a Pope to replace this Heretic.

Liberation theology - Wikipedia

21zbxe.jpg
 
No, anal sex is not a proprietorship of homosexuality. God and the founding fathers were psychos who freely practiced genocide of the Indigene (and by default the Indigene's language and religion) while invoking Plymouth rock morality. The techne of gunpowder is not a right, like coffee is a luxury, and the victims and scapegoats of religion also get molested by the inherent pathology of the U.S. Constitution that is biased toward religion rather than keeping its victims from being molested by religion, as in the dress-cake travesty.
 
flacaltenn? F's authority can't do jack about information disseminated in three dimensions. Please spare us from the fascist arrogance and Nazi book-burnings. #149 still does not escape critique simply by distancing from the Pope.

Slavoj Zizek thought he would attempt to rescue xianity's pathology with his book, The Fragile Absolute, where he attempts to synthesize Marxism with Christianity. Because it is complicated, what we get at USMB are youngsters wet behind the ears and incapable of comprehending single paragraphs before whining out, crying out in agony.

As we critique Marx and Zizek, Derrida's was the original from which Zizek draws his argument.

' "In religion people make their empirical world into an entity that is only conceived, imagined [zu einem nur gedachten vorgestellen Wesen], that confronts them as something foreign [das ihnenfremd genenuebertritt]. This again is by no means to be explained from other concepts, from 'self-consciousness' and similar nonsense, but from the entire hitherto existing mode of production and intercourse, which is just as independengt [unhabhaengig] of the pure concept as the invention of the self-acting mule [in English in the text] and the use of railways are independent of Hegelian philosophy. If he wants to speak of an 'essence' of religion, i.e., of a material basis of this inessentiality, [d.h von einer materiellen Grundlage. diese Unwesen], then he should look for it neither in the 'essence of man' [im 'Wesen des Menschen'] nor in the predicates of GHod, but in the material world which each stage of religious development finds in existence (cf. abover Fuerbach). All the 'specters' which have filed before us [die wir Revue passieren liessen] were representations internal to consciousness, as thoughts in people's heads, transferred from their objectality [Gegenstaendlichkeit] back into self-consciousness, are obsessions [der Sparren] or (fixed ideas [italics]).'

If one follows the letter of (Marx's) text, the critique of the ghost or of spirits would thus be the critique of a subjective representation and an abstraction, of what happens (in the head [it.]), of what comes only out of the head, that is, of what stays there, in the head, even as it has come out of there,out of the head, and survives (outside the head [it.]). But nothing would be possible, beginning with the critique, without the surviving, without the possible survival of this autonomy and this automatism outside the head. One may say that this is where the spirit of the Marxist critique situates itself, not the spirit that one would oppose to its letter, but the one which supposes the very movement of its letter. Like the ghost, it is neither in the head nor outside the head. Marx knows this, but he proceeds to as if he did not want to know it.'
(Derrida, Specters of Marx)

That is why xianitys' theft is shown by the law against adultery: in or outside the head, you have sinned. Nuts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Since no one has brought it up: This was not a "March for life". This was a march against the 2nd amendment.

No,it was a March for common sense gun control.

Weird! You think that March was funny?

The Pope doesn’t!

Francis is a Neo-Marxist who has preached Liberation Theology for decades, who cares what he thinks, and I'm a Roman Catholic so Francis can fuck off already hopefully soon we'll get a Pope to replace this Heretic.

Liberation theology - Wikipedia

21zbxe.jpg
You may like this RC Bishop's stance with Vatican. Bishop Richard Williamson broke even with the SPPX and he is excommunicated again! Lol.
Bishop Richard Williamson has been automatically excommunicated along with the priest he illicitly ordained a bishop, criticizing the “cuckoos who have stolen the Catholic nest which they presently occupy.”
SPPX Bishop excommunicated - again - The Catholic Thing

Also, here is one of his many videos for your enjoyment.



 
Since no one has brought it up: This was not a "March for life". This was a march against the 2nd amendment.

No,it was a March for common sense gun control.

Weird! You think that March was funny?

The Pope doesn’t!

Francis is a Neo-Marxist who has preached Liberation Theology for decades, who cares what he thinks, and I'm a Roman Catholic so Francis can fuck off already hopefully soon we'll get a Pope to replace this Heretic.

Liberation theology - Wikipedia

21zbxe.jpg
You may like this RC Bishop's stance with Vatican. Bishop Richard Williamson broke even with the SPPX and he is excommunicated again! Lol.
Bishop Richard Williamson has been automatically excommunicated along with the priest he illicitly ordained a bishop, criticizing the “cuckoos who have stolen the Catholic nest which they presently occupy.”
SPPX Bishop excommunicated - again - The Catholic Thing

Also, here is one of his many videos for your enjoyment.




Thanks! I am not a Catholic, too many things to disagree with.

No Person is infallible but at least this Pope is trying to bring the Church into this century.
 
Since no one has brought it up: This was not a "March for life". This was a march against the 2nd amendment.

No,it was a March for common sense gun control.

Weird! You think that March was funny?

The Pope doesn’t!

Francis is a Neo-Marxist who has preached Liberation Theology for decades, who cares what he thinks, and I'm a Roman Catholic so Francis can fuck off already hopefully soon we'll get a Pope to replace this Heretic.

Liberation theology - Wikipedia

21zbxe.jpg

Now for a Roman Catholic that IS
 

Forum List

Back
Top