Teen athlete says she was sexually violated by trans wrestler – and the school district did nothing

And the second the Dems get power back you let them get away with the trans shit as a "cost of doing business"
Wrong again **** stain.

It is such a small matter that there is hardly any instances of it, it’s not a national problem, and usually there isn’t an issue before, during, or after the matches are over.

Furthermore, I didn’t let them get away with anything since I’m not even a democrat.

So kindly **** off
 
Wrong again **** stain.

It is such a small matter that there is hardly any instances of it, it’s not a national problem, and usually there isn’t an issue before, during, or after the matches are over.

Furthermore, I didn’t let them get away with anything since I’m not even a democrat.

So kindly **** off

Bullshit.

The calling card of the lefty, being unable to admit their actual lefty positions and views.
 
naw, you are the one who has an obsession with other people's body parts.

I think we should all just mind our own business.
You and every other Democrat and liberal went apeshit over the Trump-grabbing-pussies circle jerk to the point that you conflated the whole thing and accused him of actually grabbing women's pussies when he said no such thing.
 
Not in Central Texas or the Gulf Coast. Maybe Dallas, but Dallas isn't really part of Texas. They smell funny.




 
Dudes playing with girls beyond 10 years old is unreasonable. You won’t know this because you never played and clearly don’t understand the HUGE difference between the sexes.

Right. I simply don't give a **** about sports, given that schools are barely teaching kids how to read.

But if you are going to have it, and then you are going to have this little set-aside for female athletes who can't compete with even mediocre males, then don't come whining to me that a whopping 10 NCAA athletes are transgender.

Guns in the hands of criminals doesn’t make us safer. If we ask everyone to turn in their guns, guess who wouldn’t? Those of us that are not criminals would be much less safe with no way to protect ourselves against criminals with guns. Again, that childish, idealistic thinking of yours has you over a reality barrel.

Hey, this funny thing happened. When the UK and Australia banned all the guns, the murder rates in those countries declined.

The idea that "I needs my guns because the bad guys will have them" is silly, given how much effort the gun industry puts into making it easy to get guns to the bad guys.
 
You and every other Democrat and liberal went apeshit over the Trump-grabbing-pussies circle jerk to the point that you conflated the whole thing and accused him of actually grabbing women's pussies when he said no such thing.

Um, he pretty clearly said what he said, and then you have all the women who have come out and said "Trump grabbed my 🐈 ".

But I'm glad to see you guys realize grabbing 🐈🐈‍⬛🐈 is a bad thing now.
 
Um, he pretty clearly said what he said, and then you have all the women who have come out and said "Trump grabbed my 🐈 ".

Who said Trump grabbed her *****?
But I'm glad to see you guys realize grabbing 🐈🐈‍⬛🐈 is a bad thing now.
If you realized it is a bad thing then why are you defending this?
 
Right. I simply don't give a **** about sports, given that schools are barely teaching kids how to read.

But if you are going to have it, and then you are going to have this little set-aside for female athletes who can't compete with even mediocre males, then don't come whining to me that a whopping 10 NCAA athletes are transgender.

Do you understand that women are uncomfortable with biological men being in the locker room with them? If there are only ten transgender males in the NCAA, you can bet there's a hell of a lot more women in the NCAA that are not comfortable with these ten guys in their locker rooms. I say majority rules on this one.
 
Who said Trump grabbed her *****?
E Jean Carroll, but you knew that.

I'm sure you'll engage in your usual attempted gaslighting on that one.

If you realized it is a bad thing then why are you defending this?
Um, because if you are going to join a sport when you are grabbing the other person, you should expect to be grabbed in places you don't like.

Would this have been bad if this were a cisgendered girl? What if the Cisgendered girl were a lesbian?

Now, if this girl had committed an intentional foul, then there should be sanctions.

Do you understand that women are uncomfortable with biological men being in the locker room with them?

Then they need to get over themselves.
 
If there are only ten transgender males in the NCAA, you can bet there's a hell of a lot more women in the NCAA that are not comfortable with these ten guys in their locker rooms. I say majority rules on this one.

So wait, I want to revisit this little bit of stupidity.

SO if the majority of athletes are white, and they decide they don't want to shower with a (Word we both know you use at home a lot), should the majority rule then?

Or should the law protect a minority group?
 
15th post
E Jean Carroll, but you knew that.

Actually, I didn't. I didn't keep up with all that because I really didn't care. But it doesn't answer my question anyway: Who said Trump grabbed her *****?
I'm sure you'll engage in your usual attempted gaslighting on that one.

You mean like suggesting Israel imagined the military buildup on their borders when you and everyone else knew that it happened?

You knew the buildup happened but what you didn't know was that I knew it too. So you tried to gaslight me into believing Israel imagined the military buildup and therefore, Israel's attack was a land grab. To your chagrin, I threw that lie back in your face and hounded you on your blatant lie to the point you tried repeatedly to escape with a plaintive "Sit down and shut up.".

No, I'm not trying to divert the discussion and I don't want to hash this shit out again with you here. Just illustrating that you're the gaslighting queen on this forum. Your gaslighting, lying and hypocrisy are legendary.

You started the gaslighting in this discussion when at first you suggested it didn't happen because you said you didn't see the genital groping in the video. But everyone knows the groping was not evident in the video because it was the wrong angle for that. At the same time you're defending and/or justifying the action as just being a part of the sport as if you know it happened.

So you believe it happened or you do not. Who can tell? But what you actually believe doesn't really matter for your purposes here. Your purpose here is to defend the transgender person's actions no matter what.
Um, because if you are going to join a sport when you are grabbing the other person, you should expect to be grabbed in places you don't like.

Grabbing genitals is against wrestling rules you idiot.
Would this have been bad if this were a cisgendered girl?
What are you asking me for? She's the one who got grabbed and felt violated so ask her.
What if the Cisgendered girl were a lesbian?
These questions are irrelevant because the girl was clearly shocked at that moment even though she thought her opponent was female. She didn't even know at that time her opponent was transgender; she didn't find that out until after the match. She said she would have filed a complaint whether he was transgender or not.

This young woman felt assaulted and violated during a sporting match by someone she thought was female and you bring up irrelevant shit about lesbians.
Now, if this girl had committed an intentional foul, then there should be sanctions.

Deflection. That goes without saying so it is irrelevant. It doesn't speak to the issue of biological males competing in women's sports, does it? That's what this is about.
Then they need to get over themselves.
Well that was easy, wasn't it? Oh, you're upset that someone went to a pro-life rally? Get over yourself. Wait, you're pissed because Jews wanted a homeland? Get over yourself. Oh my goodness, you're righteously indignant because an illegal immigrant was deported? Get over yourself.
 
So wait, I want to revisit this little bit of stupidity.

SO if the majority of athletes are white, and they decide they don't want to shower with a (Word we both know you use at home a lot), should the majority rule then?

Or should the law protect a minority group?
So wait, I want to revisit your bit of stupidity: How would you know I use that word?

Be careful how you respond because I have a black grand niece and grand nephew who I love dearly and their black father is more of a man than you are.

This one you get for free but the next one gets you reported.

You were doing just fine questioning the logic of my argument. I don't mind that but then you had to throw that baseless and irrelevant ad hominem accusation in there and just blew it all to shit. Nice going asswipe.
 
Well, you all kind of do when you try to impose Christian Nationalism on this country.

Frankly, it really doesn't cost you anything to use a person's chosen pronouns, but you act like you've been sent to the gulag when asked.
Sure it does .. why would I lie to support their fantasy?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom