Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
its a biological rationale, if you want to make perversion legal where does it end? what will you want to legalize next, beastiality?That is actually bullshit besides being totally irrelevent to the legal argument against gay marriage
Do Animals Exhibit Homosexuality? – Yale Scientific Magazine
Recent research has found that homosexual behavior in animals may be much more common than previously thought, having been documented in over 450 animal species worldwide.www.yalescientific.org
No I do not think that ! What the fuck is your point. ? Never mind...don't even bother.I have, and Windsor as well. Do you think that only gays were made eligible to marry someone of their own sex?
Not true.
Holy fucking shit! 5 more bizarre and inane posts that says nothing and in no way address the issues that I raised. Of course they saw a benefit in being able to marry! This is another example of how you say something stupid, get called out on it and then move the goal postsNo, I said most who became eligible to marry the same sex saw a benefit in gaining such a right. Since the majority of those who became eligible are straight, this should come as no surprise
Thank you once again for admitting that you are willing to allow the states to punish gay people and their children . 5 Posts now and that is about all that you have said. Little or nothing else of substance.Probably, but it should be the States right to do so.
My comprehension is poor.? You’re ability to produce a coherent sentence is non-existent, so yes I do not comprehend gibberishAgain, your comprehension is really poor. The state has an interest in limiting how closely related a couple can be. That goes for straight or gay. However, two opposite sex individuals can breed, two same sex might engage in sexual relations. Neither should and discourage same. In either case, grooming of the child is the danger and, with opposite sex couples, the possibility of defective children and bloodlines.
its a biological rationale, if you want to make perversion legal where does it end? what will you want to legalize next, beastiality?
Thank you for consitently and faithfull dragging the level of civil and intellectual discourse on the USMB into the gutter. Your question represent s a special kind of stupidits a biological rationale, if you want to make perversion legal where does it end? what will you want to legalize next, beastiality?
What is so god damned funny https://www.usmessageboard.com/members/ohpleasejustquit.83053/ ?Thank you once again for admitting that you are willing to allow the states to punish gay people and their children . 5 Posts now and that is about all that you have said. Little or nothing else of substance.
But the question remains: to what extent are you willing to allow suffering to be inflicted on gay people who cannot produce children in your preferred and approved way? I outline just some of the harm that would be done to families and children if there were unable to marry and have run from that question
You have also run from the question of whether or not you support marriage for opposite sex couples who cannot produce children in your preferred and approved way? Afterall, that is the only reason that you have articulated for denying marriage to same sex couples
It took me days to get you to any thing coherent all about gay marriage and there are certain things that you still will not be honest about because you are such a spineless coward. I have no further use for you. You have been exposed for what you are
You're cute when you're triggered.What is so god damned funny https://www.usmessageboard.com/members/ohpleasejustquit.83053/ ?
Do you have a vocbulary? Do you have a brain, or can you do no more than click on funnies?
You are not smart enough to trigger me. I do not take you clows seriously enough. From the number of "funnies" that you posted, I would say that you are the one who was triggeredYou're cute when you're triggered.
Make sure you come back tomorrow. I'm probably going to get snowed in so I'll appreciate the entertainment.
.
You are not smart enough to trigger me. I do not take you clows seriously enough. From the number of "funnies" that you posted, I would say that you are the one who was triggered
The smart guy calls us CLOWs.
Hmmmmmm.......................................
.
Yup thats you. You keep depositing your sediment here tyat is poluting the discourse.clow
noun
ˈklau̇
plural-s
1
: an outfall sluice for water from a tidal river after it has deposited its sediment on flooded land
2
: a floodgate especially for a lock or water mill
So the smart guy now asks for a "rebuttle" to his post "insted".Yup thats you. You keep depositing your sediment here tyat is poluting the discourse.
You are also too stupid to actually come up with a rebuttle to my post, but insted jump on a typo and think that makes to look smart.
So the smart guy has nothing else to say? Instead it has to nit pick about typos. Do you have a brain or not?So the smart guy now asks for a "rebuttle" to his post "insted".
.
So the smart guy has nothing else to say? Instead it has to nit pick about typos. Do you have a brain or not?
Hey look slick. I don't waste time with zombie troll bots who have no interest in , or ability to have an adult conversation on an important topic that effects human livesI don't waste time listening to fools who are functionally illiterate.
Period.
.
Hey look slick. I don't waste time with zombie troll bots who have no interest in , or ability to have an adult conversation on an important topic that effects human lives
Holy fucking shit! 5 more bizarre and inane posts that says nothing and in no way address the issues that I raised. Of course they saw a benefit in being able to marry! This is another example of how you say something stupid, get called out on it and then move the goal posts
You continue to prove yourself to be a coward, a fraud and a bigot
Thank you once again for admitting that you are willing to allow the states to punish gay people and their children . 5 Posts now and that is about all that you have said. Little or nothing else of substance.
But the question remains: to what extent are you willing to allow suffering to be inflicted on gay people who cannot produce children in your preferred and approved way? I outline just some of the harm that would be done to families and children if there were unable to marry and have run from that question
You have also run from the question of whether or not you support marriage for opposite sex couples who cannot produce children in your preferred and approved way? Afterall, that is the only reason that you have articulated for denying marriage to same sex couples
It took me days to get you to any thing coherent all about gay marriage and there are certain things that you still will not be honest about because you are such a spineless coward. I have no further use for you. You have been exposed for what you are
No straight male/female would find it beneficial to have been granted a right to marry one of the same sex.
Absurd at its base.
