Ted Cruz Says SCOTUS 'Clearly Wrong' to Legalize Gay Marriage

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Ummm, no, you made the assertion full well knowing that sexuality is not a question on the marriage license. Prove me wrong bucko.

Oh, but wait, I forgot, there is no physically distinctive difference between a straight or a gay if the same sex.

Huh, anyone answering the question could be lying. How’d ya know?

Bullshit, the fact that there is nothing about sexuality on the license does not matter. There are other ways that you might determine if these same sex straight married couples exist. You trotted that issue out as a means of trying to prove you are not a bigot and you failed as always

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Well if marriage is the only way they can have this fulfilling life you rant about, how can bisexuals possibly be happy?

Again you are making shit up! No one has said that marriage is the only way

 

[HeyNorm]

Sexuality has been the elepant in the room. The litigation centered on gender but we all know what it is about, As usual you deflect instead of actually dealing with what was said. And my happiness is not a topic for disgussion.

And I guess bisexuals happiness isn’t either.

 

[HeyNorm]

Bullshit, the fact that there is nothing about sexuality on the license does not matter. There are other ways that you might determine if these same sex straight married couples exist. You trotted that issue out as a means of trying to prove you are not a bigot and you failed as always

Why would I need to prove same sex straight couples exist? I oppose any same sex couples from marrying regardless of sexuality.

Have you developed that sexuality tester yet?

No?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

And I guess bisexuals happiness isn’t either.

Certainly not for you. I am willing to bet that you are so consumed by your hate that you are miserable and wish misery on everyone else. I have discuused the impact of the type of bigotry that you represent and the discrimination that you advocate. You have shown nothing in the way of empathy or concern for the people who you want to deny basisc rights to for no rational reason that you can articulate

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Why would I need to prove same sex straight couples exist? I oppose any same sex couples from marrying regardless of sexuality.

Because YOU claim that they exist and are using those phantom couples to prove that yu are not a bigot. But as I pointed out , even if tey are real you are still a bigot. You are also a sick joke without a punch line.

 

[HeyNorm]

Certainly not for you. I am willing to bet that you are so consumed by your hate that you are miserable and wish misery on everyone else. I have discuused the impact of the type of bigotry that you represent and the discrimination that you advocate. You have shown nothing in the way of empathy or concern for the people who you want to deny basisc rights to for no rational reason that you can articulate

Nah, I love everyone. So much I nearly burst.

But that’s a different subject.

But I am curious about determining who is gay, and who is straight. Now I can determine a black, from a brown, from a white easy enough. But I’m not clear on this sexuality test you must have developed. What gives?

 

[HeyNorm]

Because YOU claim that they exist and are using those phantom couples to prove that yu are not a bigot. But as I pointed out , even if tey are real you are still a bigot. You are also a sick joke without a punch line.

Maybe I just don’t want to intrude on their lives? I mean, they might not want your wrath upon them. Maybe ones a baker?

 

[HeyNorm]

Certainly not for you. I am willing to bet that you are so consumed by your hate that you are miserable and wish misery on everyone else. I have discuused the impact of the type of bigotry that you represent and the discrimination that you advocate. You have shown nothing in the way of empathy or concern for the people who you want to deny basisc rights to for no rational reason that you can articulate

Rational, is that it, you want rational reasoning?

 

[JoeB131]

They just have to neglect their true feeling for more than one you mean. How heartless of you Joe.

You can pursue happiness all day long, but if, for what ever reason you don’t find it, that’s not on me. Maybe try harder next time?

Marriages without romance are considered frauds? You the romance police Joe? Define romance Joe. Define Love Joe? And do you have a testing device for those?

I wouldn't presume. If two people say to me that they are in love and want to get married, I would take them at their word.

Even if they are two dudes.

 

[Wapasha]

Yeah, I’m pretty sure it was.

Well show the proof that state governments demanded proof that married couples were having intercourse. Don't disappoint.

 

[HeyNorm]

I wouldn't presume. If two people say to me that they are in love and want to get married, I would take them at their word.

Even if they are two dudes.

But the question is, what if a dude wants to marry two ladies because she’s bi. Why not right? I mean, we did open up marriage by reason of sexuality, correct?

See, there you have it. Proof of love is not a requirement to marry. Glad we got through that.

 

[HeyNorm]

Well show the proof that state governments demanded proof that married couples were having intercourse. Don't disappoint.

And, I never said they did.

Hope your not disappointed.

 

[San Souci]

Thank you for that very thoughtful and well researched dissertation on the immensely critical subject of the right of gay people to marry. Clearly you have dedicated your life to civil rights and humanitarian endeavors. You bring your Lazor sharp intellect and critical thinking skills to fight for social justice and tolerance.

You must have advanced degrees from the finest institutions of higher learning in fields as diverse as constitutional law, psychology, sociology and human sexuality. As always you raise the bar on the level of intellectual discourse and a civil exchange of ideas on the USMB > Please continue to share your indispensable pears of wisdom. God Bless YOU

China is not concentrating on "Gender Identity". Yet they will soon overtake the USA. Also ,Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed for faggin' off. AIDS was a warning shot from God. When a great civilization loses its Morals ,it FALLS. Consider Rome.

 

[Seymour Flops]

No, the Census is fine when done properly. Of course, Trump fucked the last one up, which is why we didn't get a good count of minority communities.

"not trusted" means, "Wah, my guy lost". Deal with it and grow up.

No, it is not one-sided at all:

Forty-nine percent of all Americans — including a majority of Republicans and half of all self-described independents — believe there will either be "a lot" or "some" fraud this fall, an indication of how pervasive disinformation about the 2020 election has spread and how much trust in democracy has eroded in just two years.

The poll also found:

• Democrats have more confidence in the integrity of the election than independents or Republicans, but one in three still believe there will be "a lot" or "some" fraud in the midterms
• Fifty percent of Democrats responded they believe there will be "barely any" or "none"
• Seniors were the most likely generation to trust the integrity of the vote. Concerns about fraud were particularly common among middle-aged Americans
• A quarter of all Americans who believe there will be fraud say it will be significant enough this fall to change the balance of power in Congress. That included 36% of Republicans and 26% of Democrats

 

[Seymour Flops]

My bank let's me cash checks and send money over a phone app. (I'm old school and still drop checks off).

Please give me the name of the bank that lets someone walk in and say, "I'm Joe B." and gives the person your money.

Just the name, I ask for the umpteenth time so I can verify your veracity.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

My bank let's me cash checks and send money over a phone app. (I'm old school and still drop checks off).

Please give me the name of the bank that lets someone walk in and say, "I'm Joe B." and gives the person your money.
Just the name, I ask for the umpteenth time so I can verify your veracity.

As is usual for him, Incel Joe is lying. If not a direct, literal lie, an incomplete truth stated in order to imply an untruth.

No bank is going to allow such transactions, without verifying, in some way, that the one requesting the transaction is someone who is authorized to access that account. Showing a valid ID in person is one way. A valid username and password on an online app or web site is another. My credit union lets me log in by fingerprint, via the fingerprint sensor on my phone. But one way or another, the bank is going to require some credentials before it allows access to an account.

 

[Seymour Flops]

As is usual for him, Incel Joe is lying. If not a direct, literal lie, an incomplete truth stated in order to imply an untruth.

No bank is going to allow such transactions, without verifying, in some way, that the one requesting the transaction is someone who is authorized to access that account. Showing a valid ID in person is one way. A valid username and password on an online app or web site is another. My credit union lets me log in by fingerprint, via the fingerprint sensor on my phone. But one way or another, the bank is going to require some credentials before it allows access to an account.

Exactly. Of course he is lying. Banks don't give out money with no verification that you're the account holder. You can beg, plead that it's racism to require ID, or protest being "dis-accounted," and they won't budge on that requirement. Nor should they.

There is no reason not to have fingerprint login to vote. I fingerprint login twice a day to clock in at my job.

Elections can be secure, Democrats just don't want them to be.

 

[otto105]

"“We can ease the fear that millions of same-sex and interracial couples have that their freedoms and their rights could be stripped away,” said Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), a sponsor of the bill. “We are guaranteeing same-sex and interracial couples, regardless of where they live, that their marriage is legal.”

Where exactly, are these same-sex couples and inter-racial couples whose marriages are endangered?

Is Justice Clarence Thomas worried? Mitch McConnell? Mayor Pete?

Democrats are evil. Never forget it.

Dude, do you have any critical thinking skills at all?


Did not justice ginny claim the Obergfell decision was wrongly decided.


Ducking idiot

 

[JoeB131]

But the question is, what if a dude wants to marry two ladies because she’s bi. Why not right? I mean, we did open up marriage by reason of sexuality, correct?

See, there you have it. Proof of love is not a requirement to marry. Glad we got through that.

Well, Bigamy is still against the law, so that isn't going to happen.

No, it is not one-sided at all:

Forty-nine percent of all Americans — including a majority of Republicans and half of all self-described independents — believe there will either be "a lot" or "some" fraud this fall, an indication of how pervasive disinformation about the 2020 election has spread and how much trust in democracy has eroded in just two years.

Yes, you repeat a lie often enough it becomes true. But it is the Big Lie. The election was fine. Trump lost.

You guys don't want to safeguard elections, you just want to make it harder for minorities and poor people to vote. Full stop.

No bank is going to allow such transactions, without verifying, in some way, that the one requesting the transaction is someone who is authorized to access that account. Showing a valid ID in person is one way. A valid username and password on an online app or web site is another. My credit union lets me log in by fingerprint, via the fingerprint sensor on my phone. But one way or another, the bank is going to require some credentials before it allows access to an account.

But that's the point, stupid... most of those transactions are done without identification. An online app isn't a person checking your ID. Frankly, I haven't even SEEN anyone from my bank in person in months, but yet I do dozens of transactions every month. Most of them electronic.