Perhaps this is considered an "isolated incident not indicative of the whole movement"*
similar to how these shootings are "isolated incidents" and don't represent a whole movement.
both sides argue as convenient to make their points.
If you believe that you haven't been paying attention.
Are you reading my whole statement in context?
Do you understand the use of quotation marks?
ie, QUOTE "isolated incidents" END QUOTE
see also the BOLD FACE/Large Print
Sorry, maybe the point I was making was "too subtle"
for people reading too fast and not able to pay full attention.
The notion that what's been happening is isolated shows that someone isn't paying attention. 8 cops dead in nine days.
the underlying cause of the segregation has been going on since the days of slavery
people have never fully resolve the issue of unequal property ownership
and this affects how we look at ownership of laws and govt
The big elephant in the room is people don't own equal property, don't decide their own tax laws
and where our income from our own labor goes, so we don't share equal sense of ownership of laws and govt.
Obama can't address this because he relies on the party system to manipulate
the sense of control and power, so that isn't equal.
What would be equal is localizing ownership and democratic management at the community level.
People would still be at unequal levels of development, but with educational outreach that
recognizes people are at different levels, this can be accommodated and not exploit people for it politically
as is happening now.
People talk about embracing diversity but keep dividing people by politics and economic class.
We need a system that acknowledges we aren't standing on equal ground yet.
And sets up means of education and training to bridge that gap instead of demonizing it.