Tea Partiers distribute signs paid for by RNC

Modbert

Daydream Believer
Sep 2, 2008
33,178
3,055
48
Tea Partiers distribute signs paid for by RNC | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment

The Republican National Committee is paying for signs and political buttons used by Tea Party groups — despite widespread disagreement among the conservative, grassroots activists on whether the movement should work to elect candidates within the Republican party or steer clear from it.

The items, paid for by the RNC, were on full display at a Friday press conference of Tea Party activists in Washington. At the afternoon event at the Capitol Hill Suites, activists in town for the “Take the Town Halls to Washington” project passed out the red-white-and-blue buttons and signs emblazoned with the words “Listen to Me!”

Text at the bottom of the sign reads: “Paid for by the Republican National Committee.”

Michael Patrick Leahy, an organizer of the Take the Town Halls to Washington project that is bringing Tea Party activists to the capital to lobby Democrats on President Obama’s health-care bill, admitted that the RNC “did provide the signage,” but said he didn’t know the details of the arrangement with Republicans and couldn’t explain how the signs got there. “They just showed up,” he said.

An RNC official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told The Daily Caller that the signs were given to the group at its request.

The buttons and signs were visible both at the press conference and inside “the war room,” a small area inside the hotel where the “Take the Town Halls to Washington” project is headquartered. A stack of signs sat on a chair in the conference room during the presser.

Leahy downplayed the significance of the items, explaining, “We’re taking help from anybody that has an interest in this cause.”

Of course, such facts will be downplayed by those who defend the tea party movement to the death and ignore such problems like this with the movement.
 
There are hundreds and hundreds of tea party groups across the country. Some have close relationships with the RNC and some don't.

Freedom of association - it's a wonderful thing.
 
There are hundreds and hundreds of tea party groups across the country. Some have close relationships with the RNC and some don't.

Freedom of association - it's a wonderful thing.

But by definition, none of them should have close relationships with the RNC. Especially the largest ones who are going to D.C.

How you think it's okay for a grassroots movement to have ties to the RNC is boggling.
 
Yes. There is nothing wrong with a Tea Party getting help from the RNC as long as they disclose that info. It's up to the local members. There is no National Tea Party Command & Control Organization.

Grass roots does not mean that cooperation and collaboration with existing organizations is verboten.
 
Yes. There is nothing wrong with a Tea Party getting help from the RNC as long as they disclose that info. It's up to the local members. There is no National Tea Party Command & Control Organization.

:lol: WUT.

Do you not know the definition of grassroots?

If a Tea Party is getting help from the RNC, they are no longer a grassroots group but a arm of the RNC.
 
The funny thing is they are supporting a third party that may eat their lunch in the end.
 
Yes. There is nothing wrong with a Tea Party getting help from the RNC as long as they disclose that info. It's up to the local members. There is no National Tea Party Command & Control Organization.

Grass roots does not mean that cooperation and collaboration with existing organizations is verboten.

Am I the only idiot here who thought I remembered Tea Baggers stating that independent thinking came from NOT being in bed with either one of the two large National political parties?
 
:lol: WUT.

Do you not know the definition of grassroots?

If a Tea Party is getting help from the RNC, they are no longer a grassroots group but a arm of the RNC.


B'loney. Grassroots just means an (often local) community-based movement. The members are perfectly free decide with whom they align on various issues.
 
Ummm He is not running for anything for a years and is trying to get information out on his ideas for the country.

You see we elect a president to execute the policies he ran on.

Its how democracy works , Hes president and is allowed to communicate with the people.
 
B'loney. Grassroots just means an (often local) community-based movement. The members are perfectly free decide with whom they align on various issues.

So in that case, the tea parties are not grassroots. Since the RNC is not a community-based movement.

You're actually trying to defend these people in the groups who have no problem selling out to the RNC. You're trying to say that taking things like signs from the RNC is not being a arm of the RNC, which is complete bullshit. The Tea Parties in this case are doing the job of people that the RNC would of had to pay to complete.

How you can try to justify being a shrill to the RNC while saying they have independence is boggling. :cuckoo:
 
Ummm He is not running for anything for a years and is trying to get information out on his ideas for the country.

You see we elect a president to execute the policies he ran on.

Its how democracy works , Hes president and is allowed to communicate with the people.

So your answer is that it's OK for the President to coordinate Health Care meetings, dress people up in doctor uniforms, etc. gotcha
 
:lol: WUT.

Do you not know the definition of grassroots?

If a Tea Party is getting help from the RNC, they are no longer a grassroots group but a arm of the RNC.


B'loney. Grassroots just means an (often local) community-based movement. The members are perfectly free decide with whom they align on various issues.

So they are not taking signs from the dems right?

Then I guess they are affiliated with the R party.

I think it will come back to bite the R party in electioons.
 
As usual, Junior is spouting off about things of which he knows very little.

Grassroots efforts quite often ending up supporting positions or candidates at the national level (Moveon.org - have you heard of it?). The definition of Grassroots does not include shunning any existing party. If you have reliable evidence to the contrary, please post it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top