[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEFISpoeGSs&feature=PlayList&p=19E4A769D878FEA9&index=29]YouTube - PROTESTERS AMBUSH BUSH CALL HIM A WAR CRIMINAL[/ame]
Here's another of those "in the right" civil protestors calling the president a war criminal, facist, among other things. Again I ask where was the outrage then? Or is that these people were expressing a view you happen to agree with, so you make the leap that they are then right to express it no matter what? Funny, I don't recall the word "selective" in the 1st Amendment. While those morons that painted the swastika on the sign basically are nothing more than vandals , but perhaps they were expressing outrage of the congressmen's position on a particular issue and were doing nothing more than expressing the same way those that spent years calling Bush a nazi? Although I do tend to agree to paint it on a sign was more than a bit moronic and does nothing more than lend to the speculation that it's some sort of group behind it. The bottom line here is people, if you wish to label everyone that protests events as unamerican or nazi's. or by any other name and at the same time endorse the same actions by those you happen to agree with don't expect much validation for your views.