Susan Rice Said Yesterday On MSNBC That Obama Ordered Intel Collection In January. Trump Was Right

[KeiserC]

I wonder what gave her the idea that she's authorized to conduct investigations into criminal wrongdoing.
It's that the FBI's job???

She was doing her job in reading intelligence reports. Trump has been a part of a counterintelligence investigation since July.
It stands to reason that intelligence reports would also include information pertinent to that investigation. It's her job to keep the President apprised on the subject.

Bull ******* shit!!!!

They didn’t even get an okay from the FISA court for surveillance until last October.

You seem to forget that they have no right to be monitoring Americans' communications without a warrant. If the NSA captures any they're not allowed to keep it, much less spread it around without a court order. They have to provide probable cause to a judge before they can go rooting around or developing spreadsheets on political opponents. I guess they decided that the laws were preventing them from spying on Trump so they ignored them.

What FISA warrant?

You idiots are so convoluted with this shit. Not a one of you has even a simple understanding. You're conflating all sorts of shit that has nothing to do with each other.


These are existing intelligence reports of existing intercepts from existing warrants.
They were masked by the agency that collected them and made the reports.

Rice had to request that the reporting agency unmask the names. The fact that it was granted shows clearly that is was done properly.
Simply unmasking the names so as to get a clearer picture of the report is no no way spying. Only the person who requested the unmasking is permitted to see it. They don't even get a copy let alone have the ability to forward it to anyone else.

So, I have no ******* idea what you are saying or trying to say.

I guess Susan Rice is the only person who knew Michael Flynn talked to a Russia official then.

The problem here is obviously that if what you're saying is true then Susan Rice was the leaker if she was the only person to see it.

Guess that thought never crossed your mind.

No, cause it's a dumb thought. All the people involved in gathering the information, assembling it into the report that was given to her, and deciding if her request to unmask the name was valid would know, along with their supervisors. Also, all the other people who read that same report, or other reports with the same or similar information would know.

Who are all these people? for instance there are only 19 besides Rogers in the entire CIA who have the ability to unmask the raw data or unmask it for other agencies such as the FBI

 

[BULLDOG]

They were minimized until there as a security issue requiring the name to be unmasked.

What was the security issue?

If you haven't done enough research to know that, then you need to do a little and then come back. Here is a good place to start. This will answer that question, and probably a lot more.
Susan Rice speaks out on 'unmasking' accusations: 'I leaked nothing to nobody'

funny she's saying she leaked them. she used a double negative which becomes a positive. so she did leak the names.

no, you don't get to deflect. what was found to be the security issue pal. you fking don't have anything because there is nothing. it's all make believe. I know it.

Wow, that's all you got? A poor choice of words?

it's all I need because I already know you can't post up what I asked for, because it doesn't exist. LOL. hahahahhaahahaha thanks again for proving me right.

Got it. RWNJs don't need anything but whatever Hannity tells them.

 

[hunarcy]

/---- Yes. They are masked by law. Rice unmasked them.

Since she didn't know the masked name, she only requested that it be unmasked, and explained why she needed it to be unmasked to her. Using their long used criteria, they decided her request as reasonable and exposed the name to only her. Are you trying to say you think she as the one who leaked the name? What evidence do you have of that?

SOMEBODY released the name after she requested it be unmasked. There was nothing wrong with her asking for the name to be unmasked. HOWEVER, it was a crime to release the name. Somebody needs to go to prison and I'd say she is the first candidate for investigation to become a ward of the state.

You think it should be proven first, or do you just ant to pick her up this afternoon? Does the conversation with foreign agents about canceling sanctions in exchange for wikileaks releases matter to you?

No, but this must be investigated.

No because there's no evidence that happened. Remember, Comey testified there was no evidence of collusion.

Come back hen you have something.

Wow, you're more of a moron than I expected.

 

[BULLDOG]

She was doing her job in reading intelligence reports. Trump has been a part of a counterintelligence investigation since July.
It stands to reason that intelligence reports would also include information pertinent to that investigation. It's her job to keep the President apprised on the subject.

Bull ******* shit!!!!

They didn’t even get an okay from the FISA court for surveillance until last October.

You seem to forget that they have no right to be monitoring Americans' communications without a warrant. If the NSA captures any they're not allowed to keep it, much less spread it around without a court order. They have to provide probable cause to a judge before they can go rooting around or developing spreadsheets on political opponents. I guess they decided that the laws were preventing them from spying on Trump so they ignored them.

What FISA warrant?

You idiots are so convoluted with this shit. Not a one of you has even a simple understanding. You're conflating all sorts of shit that has nothing to do with each other.


These are existing intelligence reports of existing intercepts from existing warrants.
They were masked by the agency that collected them and made the reports.

Rice had to request that the reporting agency unmask the names. The fact that it was granted shows clearly that is was done properly.
Simply unmasking the names so as to get a clearer picture of the report is no no way spying. Only the person who requested the unmasking is permitted to see it. They don't even get a copy let alone have the ability to forward it to anyone else.

So, I have no ******* idea what you are saying or trying to say.

I guess Susan Rice is the only person who knew Michael Flynn talked to a Russia official then.

The problem here is obviously that if what you're saying is true then Susan Rice was the leaker if she was the only person to see it.

Guess that thought never crossed your mind.

No, cause it's a dumb thought. All the people involved in gathering the information, assembling it into the report that was given to her, and deciding if her request to unmask the name was valid would know, along with their supervisors. Also, all the other people who read that same report, or other reports with the same or similar information would know.

Who are all these people? for instance there are only 19 besides Rogers in the entire CIA who have the ability to unmask the raw data or unmask it for other agencies such as the FBI

Sorry, I don't have their names, but how do you think all that information got on that piece of paper for her to read in the first place? Do we just have a couple of spys, and they spend most of their time writing reports?

 

[BULLDOG]

Since she didn't know the masked name, she only requested that it be unmasked, and explained why she needed it to be unmasked to her. Using their long used criteria, they decided her request as reasonable and exposed the name to only her. Are you trying to say you think she as the one who leaked the name? What evidence do you have of that?

SOMEBODY released the name after she requested it be unmasked. There was nothing wrong with her asking for the name to be unmasked. HOWEVER, it was a crime to release the name. Somebody needs to go to prison and I'd say she is the first candidate for investigation to become a ward of the state.

You think it should be proven first, or do you just ant to pick her up this afternoon? Does the conversation with foreign agents about canceling sanctions in exchange for wikileaks releases matter to you?

No, but this must be investigated.

No because there's no evidence that happened. Remember, Comey testified there was no evidence of collusion.

Come back hen you have something.

Wow, you're more of a moron than I expected.

You think you can read a silly anonymous discussion board, and gather enough information from people who know no more than you do, and determine the outcome of a federal investigation when the people actually doing the investigation aren't sure of that, and you want to call me a moron? That's funny.

 

[jc456]

What was the security issue?

If you haven't done enough research to know that, then you need to do a little and then come back. Here is a good place to start. This will answer that question, and probably a lot more.
Susan Rice speaks out on 'unmasking' accusations: 'I leaked nothing to nobody'

funny she's saying she leaked them. she used a double negative which becomes a positive. so she did leak the names.

no, you don't get to deflect. what was found to be the security issue pal. you fking don't have anything because there is nothing. it's all make believe. I know it.

Wow, that's all you got? A poor choice of words?

it's all I need because I already know you can't post up what I asked for, because it doesn't exist. LOL. hahahahhaahahaha thanks again for proving me right.

Got it. RWNJs don't need anything but whatever Hannity tells them.

so you still can't produce it.

 

[radical right]

I guess Susan Rice is the only person who knew Michael Flynn talked to a Russia official then.

Except for the translator, the analyst, the person masking the names, the person certifying the classification, the DNI, and the under sec who distributed the transcripts, and maybe half a dozen more.

 

[jc456]

I guess Susan Rice is the only person who knew Michael Flynn talked to a Russia official then.

Except for the translator, the analyst, the person masking the names, the person certifying the classification, the DNI, and the under sec who distributed the transcripts, and maybe half a dozen more.

we all agree, all made possible illegally by rice. thanks for proving how the process works when someone unmasks a name.

 

[BULLDOG]

If you haven't done enough research to know that, then you need to do a little and then come back. Here is a good place to start. This will answer that question, and probably a lot more.
Susan Rice speaks out on 'unmasking' accusations: 'I leaked nothing to nobody'

funny she's saying she leaked them. she used a double negative which becomes a positive. so she did leak the names.

no, you don't get to deflect. what was found to be the security issue pal. you fking don't have anything because there is nothing. it's all make believe. I know it.

Wow, that's all you got? A poor choice of words?

it's all I need because I already know you can't post up what I asked for, because it doesn't exist. LOL. hahahahhaahahaha thanks again for proving me right.

Got it. RWNJs don't need anything but whatever Hannity tells them.

so you still can't produce it.

I wasn't the one in charge of her request to have the name unmasked. There is a long standing and well defined procedure for unmasking names. Why don't you ask that guy? He was there.

 

[jc456]

funny she's saying she leaked them. she used a double negative which becomes a positive. so she did leak the names.

no, you don't get to deflect. what was found to be the security issue pal. you fking don't have anything because there is nothing. it's all make believe. I know it.

Wow, that's all you got? A poor choice of words?

it's all I need because I already know you can't post up what I asked for, because it doesn't exist. LOL. hahahahhaahahaha thanks again for proving me right.

Got it. RWNJs don't need anything but whatever Hannity tells them.

so you still can't produce it.

I wasn't the one in charge of her request to have the name unmasked. There is a long standing and well defined procedure for unmasking names. Why don't you ask that guy? He was there.

and now you admit you don't have any clue. thanks for admitting that. Now, wouldn't it be nice to understand why she asked to have the names unmasked?

Just like I want to know what was found that kicked off the russia collusion story.

BTW, I will not accept nothing as an answer from my government. I don't care who is in charge.

 

[KeiserC]

Bull ******* shit!!!!

They didn’t even get an okay from the FISA court for surveillance until last October.

You seem to forget that they have no right to be monitoring Americans' communications without a warrant. If the NSA captures any they're not allowed to keep it, much less spread it around without a court order. They have to provide probable cause to a judge before they can go rooting around or developing spreadsheets on political opponents. I guess they decided that the laws were preventing them from spying on Trump so they ignored them.

What FISA warrant?

You idiots are so convoluted with this shit. Not a one of you has even a simple understanding. You're conflating all sorts of shit that has nothing to do with each other.


These are existing intelligence reports of existing intercepts from existing warrants.
They were masked by the agency that collected them and made the reports.

Rice had to request that the reporting agency unmask the names. The fact that it was granted shows clearly that is was done properly.
Simply unmasking the names so as to get a clearer picture of the report is no no way spying. Only the person who requested the unmasking is permitted to see it. They don't even get a copy let alone have the ability to forward it to anyone else.

So, I have no ******* idea what you are saying or trying to say.

I guess Susan Rice is the only person who knew Michael Flynn talked to a Russia official then.

The problem here is obviously that if what you're saying is true then Susan Rice was the leaker if she was the only person to see it.

Guess that thought never crossed your mind.

No, cause it's a dumb thought. All the people involved in gathering the information, assembling it into the report that was given to her, and deciding if her request to unmask the name was valid would know, along with their supervisors. Also, all the other people who read that same report, or other reports with the same or similar information would know.

Who are all these people? for instance there are only 19 besides Rogers in the entire CIA who have the ability to unmask the raw data or unmask it for other agencies such as the FBI

Sorry, I don't have their names, but how do you think all that information got on that piece of paper for her to read in the first place? Do we just have a couple of spys, and they spend most of their time writing reports?

She got it from one of the intelligence agencies either unmasked already (which would be illicitly gotten) or she asked for it to be unmasked for her (which would also be illicitly gotten) under no circumstance (on the table in this scenario with Trump) should she as a WH staffer in the executive branch have unmasked US citizens names as it pertains to sect. 702 raw data collection under the warrant approved by the FISA court.

 

[jc456]

What FISA warrant?

You idiots are so convoluted with this shit. Not a one of you has even a simple understanding. You're conflating all sorts of shit that has nothing to do with each other.


These are existing intelligence reports of existing intercepts from existing warrants.
They were masked by the agency that collected them and made the reports.

Rice had to request that the reporting agency unmask the names. The fact that it was granted shows clearly that is was done properly.
Simply unmasking the names so as to get a clearer picture of the report is no no way spying. Only the person who requested the unmasking is permitted to see it. They don't even get a copy let alone have the ability to forward it to anyone else.

So, I have no ******* idea what you are saying or trying to say.

I guess Susan Rice is the only person who knew Michael Flynn talked to a Russia official then.

The problem here is obviously that if what you're saying is true then Susan Rice was the leaker if she was the only person to see it.

Guess that thought never crossed your mind.

No, cause it's a dumb thought. All the people involved in gathering the information, assembling it into the report that was given to her, and deciding if her request to unmask the name was valid would know, along with their supervisors. Also, all the other people who read that same report, or other reports with the same or similar information would know.

Who are all these people? for instance there are only 19 besides Rogers in the entire CIA who have the ability to unmask the raw data or unmask it for other agencies such as the FBI

Sorry, I don't have their names, but how do you think all that information got on that piece of paper for her to read in the first place? Do we just have a couple of spys, and they spend most of their time writing reports?

She got it from one of the intelligence agencies either unmasked already (which would be illicitly gotten) or she asked for it to be unmasked for her (which would also be illicitly gotten) under no circumstance (on the table in this scenario with Trump) should she as a WH staffer in the executive branch have unmasked US citizens names as it pertains to sect. 702 raw data collection under the warrant approved by the FISA court.

she can plead the fifth and clapper and brennan will bury her treasonous sorry ass.

And it takes only one unmasked call that isn't russia on the other end to meet the goal.

 

[radical right]

I guess Susan Rice is the only person who knew Michael Flynn talked to a Russia official then.

Except for the translator, the analyst, the person masking the names, the person certifying the classification, the DNI, and the under sec who distributed the transcripts, and maybe half a dozen more.

we all agree, all made possible illegally by rice. thanks for proving how the process works when someone unmasks a name.

You have it wrong. That's the list of people who knew Flynn talked to the Russians, before the masked version was sent to Susan Rice. So about a dozen people knew who the masked american was, and the nature of his conversation. Any one of them could have leaked.

 

[Syriusly]

So Trump was right. Susan Rice admits in this interview that President Obama ordered in January this year the compilation of the reports that Susan Rice used to unmask Trump officials. She admits this 7 mins into this interview. A couple of weeks ago Susan Rice claimed this didn't happen.A]

She admits that President Obama ordered the compilation of reports on Russian interference- the Russian interference that had been being reported since summer of 2016.

She never once says that President Obama ordered any spying on Trump.

Trump lied.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Exactly. That's why she had to request the name to be unmasked.

I wonder what gave her the idea that she's authorized to conduct investigations into criminal wrongdoing.
It's that the FBI's job???

She was doing her job in reading intelligence reports. Trump has been a part of a counterintelligence investigation since July.
It stands to reason that intelligence reports would also include information pertinent to that investigation. It's her job to keep the President apprised on the subject.

Bull ******* shit!!!!

They didn’t even get an okay from the FISA court for surveillance until last October.

You seem to forget that they have no right to be monitoring Americans' communications without a warrant. If the NSA captures any they're not allowed to keep it, much less spread it around without a court order. They have to provide probable cause to a judge before they can go rooting around or developing spreadsheets on political opponents. I guess they decided that the laws were preventing them from spying on Trump so they ignored them.

What FISA warrant?

You idiots are so convoluted with this shit. Not a one of you has even a simple understanding. You're conflating all sorts of shit that has nothing to do with each other.


These are existing intelligence reports of existing intercepts from existing warrants.
They were masked by the agency that collected them and made the reports.

Rice had to request that the reporting agency unmask the names. The fact that it was granted shows clearly that is was done properly.
Simply unmasking the names so as to get a clearer picture of the report is no no way spying. Only the person who requested the unmasking is permitted to see it. They don't even get a copy let alone have the ability to forward it to anyone else.

So, I have no ******* idea what you are saying or trying to say.

What motive would Rice have for asking for unmasking? The intelligence agencies doing investigational work already had the unmasked names that they required.... So as Gowdy pinned down Rogers and Comey 2 wks. ago what motive is left for Rice a WH staffer who is not doing investigational work...... ummm.... politics perhaps..... combine that with Farkas assertions in her own words.... collate and push that shit to the Hill before it's too late...

Her job.

The president has every right to know what the Intel agencies are reporting. Especially if it has to do with a counterintelligence investigation looking for foreign spies who worked to influence our election.

 

[radical right]

She got it from one of the intelligence agencies either unmasked already (which would be illicitly gotten) or she asked for it to be unmasked for her (which would also be illicitly gotten) under no circumstance (on the table in this scenario with Trump) should she as a WH staffer in the executive branch have unmasked US citizens names as it pertains to sect. 702 raw data collection under the warrant approved by the FISA court.

Wrong, wrong and wrong.

Rice was sent the 'masked' transcript because the NSA saw something suspicious, and wanted to make the National Security Advisor aware of a national security issue with the Russians. After reading the 'masked' transcript Rice wanted to know who the Americans colluding with the russians were, and asked the NSA to 'unmask' the names. The NSA approved, and the rest is history.

Nothing illegal.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

If Susan Rice's Job is to Lie To The American Public about Spying on an Incoming President and then leaking classified information, and illegally unmasking members of The Trump Team they illegally targeted for surveillance then she did her job about as well as Joseph Goebbels did.

^ Joseph Goebbels

He was good at his job.
And a Historic Villain & Proficient Liar and Propagandist!
Now Rice gets to join that club.
Maybe in a different context, but she definitely gets a membership pin.

Dude, you're doing a fair impression with your made up shit.

BUT BUT....NO SURVEILLANCE AT ALL HAPPENED, RIGHT?

Isn't that what the Unified Mantra of the entire LeftPhuckistan Clan Claimed?

And you assured us, that we were all just CRAZY....like TRUMP, Right?

The only people that made "shit" up is The Obama Administration, who said they needed to spy on an incoming president in the "Interest of National Security" and now are trying to justify their CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES after the fact by claiming there was RUSSIAN COLLUSION even though the....

FBI
NDI
CIA
Treasury
Schiff
Clapper
Brennan
Comey

All called Obama, Rice, Jarret, Farkas, Cinton and Company All Liars because there is NO PROOF OF COLLUSION.

Yes, shit heads... We can smell your desperation. We have to hold our noses just to talk to you any more.

Take your "Incidental Surveillance" and shove it up your ass with your head.
It could use some company up there in all that empty space.

Incidental, fool.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Bull ******* shit!!!!

They didn’t even get an okay from the FISA court for surveillance until last October.

You seem to forget that they have no right to be monitoring Americans' communications without a warrant. If the NSA captures any they're not allowed to keep it, much less spread it around without a court order. They have to provide probable cause to a judge before they can go rooting around or developing spreadsheets on political opponents. I guess they decided that the laws were preventing them from spying on Trump so they ignored them.

What FISA warrant?

You idiots are so convoluted with this shit. Not a one of you has even a simple understanding. You're conflating all sorts of shit that has nothing to do with each other.


These are existing intelligence reports of existing intercepts from existing warrants.
They were masked by the agency that collected them and made the reports.

Rice had to request that the reporting agency unmask the names. The fact that it was granted shows clearly that is was done properly.
Simply unmasking the names so as to get a clearer picture of the report is no no way spying. Only the person who requested the unmasking is permitted to see it. They don't even get a copy let alone have the ability to forward it to anyone else.

So, I have no ******* idea what you are saying or trying to say.

I guess Susan Rice is the only person who knew Michael Flynn talked to a Russia official then.

The problem here is obviously that if what you're saying is true then Susan Rice was the leaker if she was the only person to see it.

Guess that thought never crossed your mind.

No, cause it's a dumb thought. All the people involved in gathering the information, assembling it into the report that was given to her, and deciding if her request to unmask the name was valid would know, along with their supervisors. Also, all the other people who read that same report, or other reports with the same or similar information would know.

Who are all these people? for instance there are only 19 besides Rogers in the entire CIA who have the ability to unmask the raw data or unmask it for other agencies such as the FBI

Sorry, I don't have their names, but how do you think all that information got on that piece of paper for her to read in the first place? Do we just have a couple of spys, and they spend most of their time writing reports?

Exactly.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What FISA warrant?

You idiots are so convoluted with this shit. Not a one of you has even a simple understanding. You're conflating all sorts of shit that has nothing to do with each other.


These are existing intelligence reports of existing intercepts from existing warrants.
They were masked by the agency that collected them and made the reports.

Rice had to request that the reporting agency unmask the names. The fact that it was granted shows clearly that is was done properly.
Simply unmasking the names so as to get a clearer picture of the report is no no way spying. Only the person who requested the unmasking is permitted to see it. They don't even get a copy let alone have the ability to forward it to anyone else.

So, I have no ******* idea what you are saying or trying to say.

I guess Susan Rice is the only person who knew Michael Flynn talked to a Russia official then.

The problem here is obviously that if what you're saying is true then Susan Rice was the leaker if she was the only person to see it.

Guess that thought never crossed your mind.

No, cause it's a dumb thought. All the people involved in gathering the information, assembling it into the report that was given to her, and deciding if her request to unmask the name was valid would know, along with their supervisors. Also, all the other people who read that same report, or other reports with the same or similar information would know.

Who are all these people? for instance there are only 19 besides Rogers in the entire CIA who have the ability to unmask the raw data or unmask it for other agencies such as the FBI

Sorry, I don't have their names, but how do you think all that information got on that piece of paper for her to read in the first place? Do we just have a couple of spys, and they spend most of their time writing reports?

She got it from one of the intelligence agencies either unmasked already (which would be illicitly gotten) or she asked for it to be unmasked for her (which would also be illicitly gotten) under no circumstance (on the table in this scenario with Trump) should she as a WH staffer in the executive branch have unmasked US citizens names as it pertains to sect. 702 raw data collection under the warrant approved by the FISA court.

^ Just talking nonsense.

 

[radical right]

The president has every right to know what the Intel agencies are reporting. Especially if it has to do with a counterintelligence investigation looking for foreign spies who worked to influence our election.

They also briefed Trump on the Russian spying intelligence. Trump said it was 'fake news' and stopped getting daily briefings..