SURPRISE! Labor Department Claims Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs ‘Created’ by Joe Biden Were Fake

I mean, the gateway pundit is famously stupid. Their articles and analysis are just pure trash.

To wit, they’re trying to make a big deal because two ways of measuring employment disagree.

That’s always the case.

But they’ll try to claim it’s a conspiracy and fabrications because they’re partisan hacks. zero evidence to support it and total ignorance of methods.
Your opinion is noted....We on the right could say much the same of sites like Raw Story, or DailyKOS, yet, I never see you calling out your side for using those sites?

So, that makes your opinion on sites like Gateway, be taken with a grain of salt.
 
Lol, you loons said the tariffs would make inflation skyrocket. You're an idiot.
They will eventually. That’s why Trump keeps cancelling them.

The products you buy today were imported months ago. The effect of tariffs takes time to develop.
 
Your opinion is noted....We on the right could say much the same of sites like Raw Story, or DailyKOS, yet, I never see you calling out your side for using those sites?

So, that makes your opinion on sites like Gateway, be taken with a grain of salt.

I looked at the BED and BLS employment results going back years and they always disagree somewhat. Being off by hundreds of thousands is not unusual.

I don’t cite Raw Story or Daily Kos. Yesterday, a conservative refused to look at a link to PBS. That’s idiotic.
 
They will eventually. That’s why Trump keeps cancelling them.

The products you buy today were imported months ago. The effect of tariffs takes time to develop.
Lol, you're getting you ass handed to you by Trump. I just hope you loons don't release another deadly virus to crash the economy again, like you loons did in 2020.
 
Lol, you're getting you ass handed to you by Trump. I just hope you loons don't release another deadly virus to crash the economy again, like you loons did in 2020.

See. This is what I get after giving you a reasoned reply.

Nothing but partisan gibberish.
 
Inflation is a measurement of the rate of increase.
No
It is a measurement over a period of time. It is a fluid number that changes according to what period of time you measure.
While Biden was in office - inflation - increased to a 40 year high.
You can attempt to hide that, but it doesn't change that reality.
 
Trump said it’s Biden’s economy still and he hasn’t had a chance to have an impact yet.

So Biden lowered inflation.
Lowered from 40 year highs.
 
Chavez-DeRemer, if confirmed by the Senate, will be expected to pilot the agency into a more business-friendly policy approach, starting off with tossing several regulations recently finalized by the outgoing Biden administration.

Those include measures to expand overtime pay eligibility to millions of workers, allow for the consideration of environmental, social, and governance factors in employee retirement investments, and raise the bar for classifying gig workers as independent contractors, among others.


“Lori has worked tirelessly with both Business and Labor to build America’s workforce, and support the hardworking men and women of America,” Trump wrote when announcing the pick via the Truth Social platform Friday. “I look forward to working with her to create tremendous opportunity for American Workers, to expand Training and Apprenticeships, to grow wages and improve working conditions, to bring back our Manufacturing jobs.”

Such an oxymoron, Trump says they will increase wages yet cut the increased wages under Biden on overtime rules.
Such a moron. You whine and moan about matters you are clueless of.
 
I looked at the BED and BLS employment results going back years and they always disagree somewhat. Being off by hundreds of thousands is not unusual.
Ok, well both of those have been up since Trump came in office...
I don’t cite Raw Story or Daily Kos. Yesterday, a conservative refused to look at a link to PBS. That’s idiotic.
That wasn't the point...the point is that we have members in here that called out GP as being a biased site, without addressing the argument at all. That is a fallacy. You understand that right?

Then you chimed in, trying to defend the calling out of GP, and then when I talk about not seeing you call out your own ilk using sites like Raw Story, you say, "Well, I don't use them".... I wasn't talking about you specifically, but liberals in general.

So, could you tell me why it is you'll defend someone from your ilk dismissing a subject based on Gateway Pundit, but refuse to call out your own peoples for using biased sites? I know you won't answer that...But, there it is, hanging out there.
 
Ok, well both of those have been up since Trump came in office...
But they're not. The BED survey for Q3 2024 just came out, that's the topic of the thread. We won't have this data for the start of Trump's term for a long time.
That wasn't the point...the point is that we have members in here that called out GP as being a biased site, without addressing the argument at all. That is a fallacy. You understand that right?

Then you chimed in, trying to defend the calling out of GP, and then when I talk about not seeing you call out your own ilk using sites like Raw Story, you say, "Well, I don't use them".... I wasn't talking about you specifically, but liberals in general.

So, could you tell me why it is you'll defend someone from your ilk dismissing a subject based on Gateway Pundit, but refuse to call out your own peoples for using biased sites? I know you won't answer that...But, there it is, hanging out there.
Gateway Pundit is bad. Even you should see that. You can quote the actual report if you want to be taken seriously because Gateway Pundit is garbage.

I use websites like CBS, but you will dismiss it.
 
Gateway Pundit is bad. Even you should see that. You can quote the actual report if you want to be taken seriously because Gateway Pundit is garbage.

I use websites like CBS, but you will dismiss it.
You do know that ad hominem is a logical fallacy right?

It's a lazy way out of having to address the content.

Like I said pretty much all "news" commentary has taken one ideological side or another these days.

So, I am supposed to acknowledge what CBS says, while you can just dismiss any topic GP, or FNC puts out at will eh? Nice double standard you got there.
 
You do know that ad hominem is a logical fallacy right?

It's a lazy way out of having to address the content.

Like I said pretty much all "news" commentary has taken one ideological side or another these days.

So, I am supposed to acknowledge what CBS says, while you can just dismiss any topic GP, or FNC puts out at will eh? Nice double standard you got there.

I don't think it's rational to treat the Gateway Pundit the same as CBS News. They're not in the same category of reliability.
 
I don't think it's rational to treat the Gateway Pundit the same as CBS News. They're not in the same category of reliability.
MSMedia has done this to themselves....They have forsaken real news reporting for Op Ed style, yellow journalism.
 
As the left has continued to stutter and mumble about the Biden job creation claims, even as those numbers were relentlessly revised downward after the fact, the labor dept. has waded in for clarification.

Yet another scam exposed by the lying, dishonest left.



Would you believe that the Biden administration allegedly LIED about how many jobs were created on his watch? Shocking, isn’t it? Yet that’s exactly what the Labor Department is now claiming.

They are saying that the nearly half a million jobs created from last summer into the fall never existed. The timing of the lie, being right before the presidential election, must be a complete coincidence. Democrats would never lie about such an important issue just to win an election, would they?


Where is the surprise again? I said repeatedly at the time I thought Biden was cooking the books.
 
15th post
MSMedia has done this to themselves....They have forsaken real news reporting for Op Ed style, yellow journalism.
So you can engage in ad hominems, but no one else can. Gotcha.

This is what I mean about media literacy. You lack it. Or more accurately, you don't care. If media reports something you want to hear, then it's reliable. If they report something you don't want to hear, it's biased and fake.
 
So you can engage in ad hominems, but no one else can. Gotcha.

This is what I mean about media literacy. You lack it. Or more accurately, you don't care. If media reports something you want to hear, then it's reliable. If they report something you don't want to hear, it's biased and fake.
Well, let's turn this around, because everything you just posted here, I could say of you....

I just posted how I discern news, by using both sides articles, yet you simply brush that aside for your own slurs....

You need to do better.
 
Well, let's turn this around, because everything you just posted here, I could say of you....

I just posted how I discern news, by using both sides articles, yet you simply brush that aside for your own slurs....

You need to do better.

You can judge the quality of a story on its own. Reading the gateway pundit article, it’s clear this is low quality journalism, or whatever you want to call it.

That’s called media literacy.
 
Back
Top Bottom