Sure trump says crazy stuff sometimes.

[Lesh]

None of which she complied with.

She had been told to leave. She was leaving

 

[Lesh]

If a woman's name is different on their identification than on their birth certificate, verification of the name change is required, however the legislation does not require the woman to change her name when she marries.

The standard is verification, and it applies equally to everyone regardless of gender.

So married women have to bring an extra layer of ID?

Yeah. That won’t keep people from voting at all

 

[Bitterhook]

So married women have to bring an extra layer of ID?

Yeah. That won’t keep people from voting at all

That's not what I posted at all.
The standard required in the legislation is verification, and that simply includes whatever is required to verify the name.

It has nothing to do with gender, and since same sex couples can be married, that would include anyone who changed their name as a matter of marriage, and the name on their birth certificate is different (also would include any documents associated with any name change and not just marriage certificates).

Whatever other nonsense you are trying to express is just stupid nonsense.
The requirements for verification in voter registration, and presenting proper photo identification every time someone votes have been required for decades in my state under state law.

You are pretending that people cannot do simple tasks, that require minimal effort.

 

[Mack Brazile]

We can just ignore it, right?

But what if it's on purpose?

The video below explains why it might be.

Under 2 minutes, I know nobody (including me) has a real attention span anymore.

Goddamnit Fauci lol

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Add to that she was driving on accumulated snow.
Even if she had an SRT Hellcat, she couldn't get up much speed in such a short distance driving on snow.

The physics of the situation kept her from reaching a speed that would be considered capable of serious injury.

That doesn't matter. The one factor everyone on the left ignores in these types of cases between officers and suspects is the factor of the unknown. It doesn't matter what her speed ended up being because the officers didn't know her intentions. For all they knew, she meant to run them down.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

She had been told to drive away.

She drove away.

Only when the officer told her to get out of the vehicle and grabbed at her door handle.

She was told to leave. She did not comply. She was told to get out of the vehicle. She did not comply. The officer grabs at the door to force her out of the vehicle and she hits the gas so as not to comply but ironically complies with the first command - albeit belatedly - and strikes another officer with her vehicle.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

She had been told to leave. She was leaving

She was told to exit the vehicle because she refused to leave when they told her to.

There's no way to spin this to where her actions are not what got her shot. If she had complied and left and/or exited the vehicle when they asked her to, she would still be alive.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

So married women have to bring an extra layer of ID?

Yeah. That won’t keep people from voting at all

As I understand it, only when applying for the ID, not to vote.

 

[22lcidw]

So married women have to bring an extra layer of ID?

Yeah. That won’t keep people from voting at all

Of course, you know enough to get the free stuff.

 

[Mac-7]

At 3 miles an hour she was hardly “gunning the gas pedal “

Stop lying

3 mph is enough to kill or seriously injure someone

 

[Harry Dresden]

Really? I’m not at war with anyone..

you dont have to at war to be a retard....

 

[postman]

If a woman's name is different on their identification than on their birth certificate, verification of the name change is required, however the legislation does not require the woman to change her name when she marries.

The standard is verification, and it applies equally to everyone regardless of gender.

You know that means Miley Cyrus can't vote without presenting a court order.

 

[postman]

You are pretending that people cannot do simple tasks, that require minimal effort.

No, I think he's saying that people can't do simple tasks that they completed decades ago, and suddenly are being forced to do all over again.

Think about it. What would you do if the IRS suddenly said that you had to refile your 1040 from twenty years ago. Do you still have all the forms and schedules and supporting documentation to do that?

 

[theHawk]

We can just ignore it, right?

But what if it's on purpose?

The video below explains why it might be.

Under 2 minutes, I know nobody (including me) has a real attention span anymore.

Is that why democrats “misspeak” so often?

It’s intentional and it’s because they are authoritarians?

 

[postman]

That doesn't matter. The one factor everyone on the left ignores in these types of cases between officers and suspects is the factor of the unknown. It doesn't matter what her speed ended up being because the officers didn't know her intentions. For all they knew, she meant to run them down.

Re: The one factor everyone on the left ignores in these types of cases between officers and suspects is the factor of the unknown.

This is where the Ashli Babbit shooting comes back to haunt conservatives.

You claim Ashli Babbit was unarmed (although they found she had a knife) that not knowing what was in her backpack, her breaking and entering was sufficient cause to presume her intentions were not good.

 

[postman]

As I understand it, only when applying for the ID, not to vote.

The SAFE act requires it every time you vote. Unless you have certain approved ID's like a passport.

 

[postman]

3 mph is enough to kill or seriously injure someone

In what world is that?

The average risk of death for a pedestrian reaches 10% at an impact speed of 23 mph, 25% at 32 mph, 50% at 42 mph, 75% at 50 mph, and 90% at 58 mph.

What do you think the risk of death is at 3 mph?

A quick extrapolation puts it down to 2% at 14 mph

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Re: The one factor everyone on the left ignores in these types of cases between officers and suspects is the factor of the unknown.

This is where the Ashli Babbit shooting comes back to haunt conservatives.

You claim Ashli Babbit was unarmed (although they found she had a knife) that not knowing what was in her backpack, her breaking and entering was sufficient cause to presume her intentions were not good.

I've never said a word about the Ashli Babbit case to you or anyone.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

The SAFE act requires it every time you vote. Unless you have certain approved ID's like a passport.

Incorrect. A quick google search and reviewing the requirements listed at various sites only say it's required to register, not to vote.

 

[Bitterhook]

No, I think he's saying that people can't do simple tasks that they completed decades ago, and suddenly are being forced to do all over again.

Think about it. What would you do if the IRS suddenly said that you had to refile your 1040 from twenty years ago. Do you still have all the forms and schedules and supporting documentation to do that?

That's just nonsense and your analogy is nonsense, because any taxes I filed 20 years ago have already been signed, filed and documented, and record keeping for the IRS is not my obligation.

Likewise, the SAVE Act does not require me to resubmit what I have already provided at the voter's registrar's office.
If it did require me to resubmit, I have all the documents required, because I am an adult, these things are important, and not that complicated.