Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
ROTFL! Cannon in the 18th century were all single shot muzzleloaders. HAHAHAHA!
You're not the sharpest marshmallow in the bag...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ROTFL! Cannon in the 18th century were all single shot muzzleloaders. HAHAHAHA!
I beg to differ- ask John Roberts- ya know, that Supreme that wears a black dress- a fine, is a tax instead- yeah, that guy in a black dress-You need remedial english. interpret is not rewriting.YOU ARE STUPID
No. The 2nd amendment says the people have a right to be armed. Back in the 18th century, when the amendment was written,the only guns available were single shot muzzleloaders. The founders had no way of knowing about automatic weapons and tanks.
Felons should not be allowed to own a gun there's a reason for that you know.
You are indeed a brainless boob and a waste of food, air and the space you occupy on this planet. You have no more ability to reason than a turnip.ROTFL! Cannon in the 18th century were all single shot muzzleloaders. HAHAHAHA!Bullshit! The second amendment was penned with the events of Lexington and Concord fresh in the minds of the founders. Cannon and shot were involved in that incident which were the weapons of mass destruction of the day. The founders chose their words wisely using the word "arms" and not guns to purposely keep the 2nd both broad and lasting in its meaning so it would stay up to date and current.No. The 2nd amendment says the people have a right to be armed. Back in the 18th century, when the amendment was written,the only guns available were single shot muzzleloaders. The founders had no way of knowing about automatic weapons and tanks.The second amendment is one single two part sentence written in clear, concise and certain language so needs no interpretation. It states the law and also explains why it exists. It along with the supremacy clause renders all gun laws at any level within these United States un constitutional, un enforceable and illegal. There's a beginning and end to it. It's just that simple.
You're simply full of shit and know nothing of our history. You would do well to keep your mouth shut in future so as not to display your ignorance and limited IQ so broadly. You can't hide your short comings by parroting other idiots, you only reinforce them.
Hardly. The Founders used privateers, those privateers were expected to purchase their own weapons of war. They had no problem with private citizens owning cannons and the like.No. The 2nd amendment says the people have a right to be armed. Back in the 18th century, when the amendment was written,the only guns available were single shot muzzleloaders. The founders had no way of knowing about automatic weapons and tanks.The second amendment is one single two part sentence written in clear, concise and certain language so needs no interpretation. It states the law and also explains why it exists. It along with the supremacy clause renders all gun laws at any level within these United States un constitutional, un enforceable and illegal. There's a beginning and end to it. It's just that simple.
There where also no computers, smart phones or internet. If you want to use that line of reasoning you should be ignored until you write it up using a quill and ink and have it delivered to everyone by a guy on horseback.No. The 2nd amendment says the people have a right to be armed. Back in the 18th century, when the amendment was written,the only guns available were single shot muzzleloaders. The founders had no way of knowing about automatic weapons and tanks.The second amendment is one single two part sentence written in clear, concise and certain language so needs no interpretation. It states the law and also explains why it exists. It along with the supremacy clause renders all gun laws at any level within these United States un constitutional, un enforceable and illegal. There's a beginning and end to it. It's just that simple.
Your so called sensible gun control doesn't effect criminals.How about the right to arm bears?
And the point of going over already ruled upon law?
You afraid somebody's coming for your guns.....again?
Xi's man has vowed to disarm the peasants as the Chinese Communist Party explains here;
Biden's gun control plan would impose strict regulations on owners of assault-style rifles - CNN Politics
Joe Biden is proposing to force owners of assault-style rifles to either sell their firearms through a voluntary buyback program or register them with the federal government under the same law that was first used to strictly control sales of machine guns in the wake of the gangland shootings of...www.cnn.com
But it's interesting to note that as Quid Pro wants to leave the proles defenseless;
American gun sales soar to staggering record high in 2020
Pass the ammo. While 2020 has been a bummer year for millions of Americans, one significant winner has been firearms. Still about 60 days until year’s end, U.S. gun sales have hit an all-time…www.nydailynews.com
So the Maoist thugs who are behind corrupt old Bai-Degn are facing down more Americans than ever.
Quid Pro still plans to have the Furry as his czar of disarming the populace if he gets the steal, right?
Joe Biden promises to put Beto O’Rourke in charge of gun control
Moments after former Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke — who promised in a September debate to take away legally purchased assault rifles if elected — endorsed Joe Biden’s…nypost.com
Hey, a man who dresses up like a squirrel to get buttfucked is eminently qualified to tell Americans to disarm.
View attachment 418323
No one has said anything of the sort. Sensible gun control measures do not involve confiscation. But please, fear monger away.