Supreme Court Upholds TikTok Ban, Sale Required by Chinese Parent Firm

So you believe that politicians are not supposed to do what the people who voted for them want? So what exactly do you think politicians are expected to do?
I happen to believe that if a politician does not do what those who voted for them want then they should remove them from office.
I do believe that a politician should help to enact laws that make citizens safer. Do you feel that you should be allowed to start a war in the heart of the U.S. or should politicians be allowed to make laws against that? Do you believe that you should be allowed to set a theater on fire or should we allow politicians to write laws against that?
If it were one politician then no they should not be allowed. But a quorum of elected officials should be able to set laws.
But we are talking about the Supreme Court which made a decision based on the law. That was law set by a large number of elected officials.
Starting violence isn't really comparable to listening to various sources of information, even ones the government doesn't like.
 
Starting violence isn't really comparable to listening to various sources of information, even ones the government doesn't like.
So exactly who do you think should enact laws? Only you? Perhaps only you and a friend?
I never claimed violence was comparable. I was using as an illustration only. I tried to make it simple to understand.
So now explain exactly why a program that spreads disinformation and maybe giving undesirable information to China should not be curtailed.
 
So exactly who do you think should enact laws? Only you? Perhaps only you and a friend?
I never claimed violence was comparable. I was using as an illustration only. I tried to make it simple to understand.
So now explain exactly why a program that spreads disinformation and maybe giving undesirable information to China should not be curtailed.
This isn't about who should enact laws. Its about whether we should enact laws that limit discussion and the free exchange of information just because law makers or a group of voters doesn't like or value that information.
 
This isn't about who should enact laws. Its about whether we should enact laws that limit discussion and the free exchange of information just because law makers or a group of voters doesn't like or value that information.
So we should allow someone to claim that there are so many destroyers, so many tenders, so many battleships and an aircraft carrier in a certain port to everyone.
We should allow everyone to know the number of active troops in all military installations and exactly where they are located.
We should not try to limit someone claiming that they need to kill Biden or some other person and trying to incite others to follow suit.
We should allow someone telling people that it is perfectly lawful to not file taxes.
We should allow the KKK to incite others with disinformation.
No matter how many people feel that these kinds of things are not acceptable just because you want to see and hear these types of things.
 
So we should allow someone to claim that there are so many destroyers, so many tenders, so many battleships and an aircraft carrier in a certain port to everyone.
People can claim anything they want. People on here claim the 2020 election was stolen, that Hillary was running a secret sex ring under a pizza shop.... the internet and the world really, is a strange place.
We should allow everyone to know the number of active troops in all military installations and exactly where they are located.
I never said that we shouldn't have classified information but that should be classified in all mediums, not specific to tik tok.
We should not try to limit someone claiming that they need to kill Biden or some other person and trying to incite others to follow suit.
We should allow someone telling people that it is perfectly lawful to not file taxes.
We should allow the KKK to incite others with disinformation.
No matter how many people feel that these kinds of things are not acceptable just because you want to see and hear these types of things.
The only thing problematic there is someone inciting others to violence. Having a difference opinion is everyone's constitutional right.
 
People can claim anything they want. People on here claim the 2020 election was stolen, that Hillary was running a secret sex ring under a pizza shop.... the internet and the world really, is a strange place.

I never said that we shouldn't have classified information but that should be classified in all mediums, not specific to tik tok.

The only thing problematic there is someone inciting others to violence. Having a difference opinion is everyone's constitutional right.
And yet Tic Tok has as part of their operating system a gps system.
You have not given any real reason not to require them to sell or stop being enabled in the U.S. other then you do not want them to be.
You claim that politicians should not be allowed to make a law restricting Tik Tok but then you claim they should be allowed to pass laws.
You claim that we should have secrets but want those secrets given away by gps.
You have done nothing but show that you do not like one thing but are willing to back others.
We had people claiming that Hunters laptop was Russian disinformation when they had not even looked at it.
I feel freedom of speech and information is vital but I also believe that there has to be a limit on it as well.
 
Many small businesses advertise with TikTok and 63% of teens use it.
 
1737171372956.jpeg


time is running out!
 

Forum List

Back
Top