What exactly is Amazon finding out that relates to victims suing the PLO? Amazon is an American company incorporated and doing business in the USA and being sued in the USA for infringing on American patents.
Under this ruling, victims of PLO terrorists are allowed to sue the Palestinian Liberation Organization in the USA, and if they win, seize assets owned by the PLO in the USA. If they can find any.
Americans are only allowed to sue the PLO. The actual organization, not its donors or the "supporters" of the PLO. And they can only sue the PLO in the USA. You can't sue the PLO in France or Palestine for that matter, because the Order signed by the Supreme Court has no validity outside the USA.
So if you can find an organization founded by the Palestine Liberation Organization in the USA, with enough assets to be bothered suing them, then have at it. Because otherwise, this ruling gives victims NOTHING.
The focus remains on the legal proceedings and the plaintiffs' efforts to hold the PLO and PA accountable. Critics, including tech workers and human rights groups, have raised concerns that Amazon’s technology is indirectly aiding in actions linked to the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
So time will tell if you are correct. You are looking in a crystal ball and have no idea of the ties of organizations using the market to launder and distribute funds to terrorist organizations.
The restraints of democracy impede progress and prosperity.
A one-party system removes those restraints. There's no need for the regime to fuk around with courts that resist progress. Just make damn sure that there are no losses. Such as for one example, needing to observe regulations that kill profits.
There is no one party system in the USA. But if we get one it is because the Democrat Party is so devoid of ideas, ethics, vision, integrity that it dissolved itself.
Meanwhile it is very refreshing every time the SCOTUS is at gives citizens a fighting chance against destructive leftist ideology.
You ever ask yourself, say, am I in a good frame of mind considering hateful menopausal women leading men by the shaft are the liberal's biggest mouths?
The problem being you can only go after the PLO on US soil. You can't attach their assets or bank accounts outside of the USA because this ruling has no standing outside the USA. This ruling has no effect or meaning.
This man, Lee Waters, was employed by Sustrans, a “charity” that lobbied extensively for speed limits on Welsh roads to be cut to 20mph. He then became a politician, was made transport minister, and imposed 20mph.
Sustrans gets millions in government cash.
Scott free in Wales, but in the US of A?
Maybe not so much. NGO's and their nefarious lobbies are next on the Scotus' chopping block.
Recent SCOTUS decisions, such as Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024), which overturned Chevron deference, have limited federal agencies' regulatory powers, potentially affecting NGO-influenced regulations.
Additionally, rulings like Citizens United v. FEC (2010) have shaped the landscape for corporate and organizational political spending, which could indirectly impact NGO lobbying.
Anyone can create a graphic and you had to search for it.
Since you have no innovattion.
And.
Only leftists and their leeching ilk have multiple paying hands up their asses.
While Putin doesn't like the state of affairs at all. He's been yanked out of the ME.
China too.
Syria: Russia lost a key ally with the ousting of Bashar al-Assad in December 2024, diminishing Moscow's military and strategic foothold in the region. Russia's naval base in Tartus and airbase in Khmeimim were critical for projecting power, but their relevance has waned with the collapse of the Assad regime.
Iran: Russia's strategic partnership with Iran, formalized in a January 2025 treaty, has not translated into robust military support amid Israel's ongoing strikes on Iran. Putin has condemned the attacks and offered mediation, but analysts note Moscow's reluctance to provide direct military aid, prioritizing its own war in Ukraine and relations with Gulf states and Israel. This has led to perceptions of Russia abandoning Iran, especially as Tehran faces significant pressure.
Oh, it's much more than tarrifs. This is a multi-faceted approach and the left have absolutely no answer to it other than to embrace criminal illegal aliens on a 90-10 issue. Much like they embrace the lunatic trans community.
And, what's more?
It's also about redistributing (don't leftists love that word?) cheap labor from out of the Hamptons, etc and into the farm force.
Anyone can create a graphic and you had to search for it.
Since you have no innovattion.
And.
Only leftists and their leeching ilk have multiple paying hands up their asses.
While Putin doesn't like the state of affairs at all. He's been yanked out of the ME.
China too.
Syria: Russia lost a key ally with the ousting of Bashar al-Assad in December 2024, diminishing Moscow's military and strategic foothold in the region. Russia's naval base in Tartus and airbase in Khmeimim were critical for projecting power, but their relevance has waned with the collapse of the Assad regime.
Iran: Russia's strategic partnership with Iran, formalized in a January 2025 treaty, has not translated into robust military support amid Israel's ongoing strikes on Iran. Putin has condemned the attacks and offered mediation, but analysts note Moscow's reluctance to provide direct military aid, prioritizing its own war in Ukraine and relations with Gulf states and Israel. This has led to perceptions of Russia abandoning Iran, especially as Tehran faces significant pressure.
