Support Your President! {KING}

[PredFan]

Goes to show how effective the fear mongering and pro war propaganda machine has been.

well, that is not what the present Administration has anything to do with.

You assert that this administration has been silent as to the supposed threat ISIS poses to the US?

they have asserted their influence in the Middle East in a non militaristic fashion as their default position - and when they took care of Libya, Gaddafi the republicans screamed bloody murder.

.

Aaaannnd totally fucked it up.

 

[BreezeWood]

they have asserted their influence in the Middle East in a non militaristic fashion as their default position - and when they took care of Libya, Gaddafi the republicans screamed bloody murder.

Libya? The new North African miasma of radical islamic groups vying to control oil fields to fund their operations, that Libya?
Hardly a positive point for any administration.

your only sallow because they accomplished the feat without a single military casualty and was not a budgetary debacle.

.

 

[Zander]

Obama is white trash.

 

[MisterBeale]

In fact, just 26% of Americans now feel the nation is safer than before 9/11.

ISIS Threat Fear of Terror Attack Soars to 9 11 High NBC News WSJ Poll Finds - NBC News

Goes to show how effective the fear mongering and pro war propaganda machine has been.

If the truth was more well know, then people would probably be more willing to ignore this sensationalism. We should probably get back to this immigration issue. Personally, I think it is more pressing. . . .


The Covert Origins of ISIS
The Covert Origins of ISIS UPDATED 9.03.14 SCG News

Syria, we backed I believe, in some cases some of the wrong people and not in the right part of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) that's a little confusing to people. So I've always maintained, and go back quite some time that we were backing the wrong types. I think it's going to turn out maybe this weekend in a new special that Brett Baer is going to have Friday that's gonna show some of those weapons from Benghazi ended up in the hands of ISIS. So we helped build ISIS.

See, that's what Benghazi was all about. That is what they were trying to hide, why they didn't want the Ambassador and his contingent saved. They wanted no leads, no funding and arming ties leading back to D.C. They didn't want what we were doing splashed all over the TV and the papers.

. . .Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh released an article in April of 2014 which exposed a classified agreement between the CIA, Turkey and the Syrian rebels to create what was referred to as a "rat line". The "rat line" was covert network used to channel weapons and ammunition from Libya, through southern turkey and across the Syrian border. Funding was provided by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
With Stevens dead any direct U.S. involvement in that arms shipment was buried, and Washington would continue to claim that they had not sent heavy weaponry into Syria.

The Red Line and the Rat Line
Seymour M. Hersh on Obama, Erdoğan and the Syrian rebels
Seymour M. Hersh The Red Line and the Rat Line Erdo an and the Syrian rebels LRB 17 April 2014

In January, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on the assault by a local militia in September 2012 on the American consulate and a nearby undercover CIA facility in Benghazi, which resulted in the death of the US ambassador, Christopher Stevens, and three others. The report’s criticism of the State Department for not providing adequate security at the consulate, and of the intelligence community for not alerting the US military to the presence of a CIA outpost in the area, received front-page coverage and revived animosities in Washington, with Republicans accusing Obama and Hillary Clinton of a cover-up. A highly classified annex to the report, not made public, described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdoğan administrations. It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria. A number of front companies were set up in Libya, some under the cover of Australian entities. Retired American soldiers, who didn’t always know who was really employing them, were hired to manage procurement and shipping. The operation was run by David Petraeus, the CIA director who would soon resign when it became known he was having an affair with his biographer. (A spokesperson for Petraeus denied the operation ever took place.)

The operation had not been disclosed at the time it was set up to the congressional intelligence committees and the congressional leadership, as required by law since the 1970s. The involvement of MI6 enabled the CIA to evade the law by classifying the mission as a liaison operation. The former intelligence official explained that for years there has been a recognised exception in the law that permits the CIA not to report liaison activity to Congress, which would otherwise be owed a finding. (All proposed CIA covert operations must be described in a written document, known as a ‘finding’, submitted to the senior leadership of Congress for approval.) Distribution of the annex was limited to the staff aides who wrote the report and to the eight ranking members of Congress – the Democratic and Republican leaders of the House and Senate, and the Democratic and Republicans leaders on the House and Senate intelligence committees. This hardly constituted a genuine attempt at oversight: the eight leaders are not known to gather together to raise questions or discuss the secret information they receive.

The annex didn’t tell the whole story of what happened in Benghazi before the attack, nor did it explain why the American consulate was attacked. ‘The consulate’s only mission was to provide cover for the moving of arms,’ the former intelligence official, who has read the annex, said. ‘It had no real political role.’

Washington abruptly ended the CIA’s role in the transfer of arms from Libya after the attack on the consulate, but the rat line kept going. ‘The United States was no longer in control of what the Turks were relaying to the jihadists,’ the former intelligence official said. Within weeks, as many as forty portable surface-to-air missile launchers, commonly known as manpads, were in the hands of Syrian rebels. On 28 November 2012, Joby Warrick of the Washington Post reported that the previous day rebels near Aleppo had used what was almost certainly a manpad to shoot down a Syrian transport helicopter. ‘The Obama administration,’ Warrick wrote, ‘has steadfastly opposed arming Syrian opposition forces with such missiles, warning that the weapons could fall into the hands of terrorists and be used to shoot down commercial aircraft.’ Two Middle Eastern intelligence officials fingered Qatar as the source, and a former US intelligence analyst speculated that the manpads could have been obtained from Syrian military outposts overrun by the rebels. There was no indication that the rebels’ possession of manpads was likely the unintended consequence of a covert US programme that was no longer under US control.

 

[Vigilante]

TONIGHT PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH (LOLOLOL) BROUGHT TO YOU BY.....

 

[AmericanFirst]

During a time of crisis, Americans are supposed to rally around our leader. ISIS is calling OUR president out personally!

SUPPORT YOUR PRESIDENT!

I will support him when he actually supports America instead of leading according to poll numbers.

 

[AmericanFirst]

We have no leader. We have a Manchurian candidate for the socialist movement. We have a President that truly dislikes America. We have a President that seeks ways to circumvent our Constitution. What's to support about him?

Being an uppity senior citizen doesn't give you the prerogative to have such impotent opinions.

You state: 'We have a Manchurian candidate for the socialist movement,' but you enjoyed the free education which is both Marxist and Socialist.

You state: 'We have a President that truly dislikes America,' but have nothing to back it up except lies and deception.

You state: 'We have a President that seeks ways to circumvent our Constitution,' without admitting that due to your failed voting record we have a Republican appointed Supreme Court Justices that makes rulings such as; 'corporations are people.' These are the same corporations that keep wages low, help their under paid employees apply for welfare, and don't create new jobs because their taxpayer subsidies have dried up.

Let me leave you with this thought. If you voted for a Republican in the last 45 years, you've cemented your Children's and Grand Children's future in not being able to be as financially successful as you. A legacy you can be so proud!

Typical libtard lies.

 

[TemplarKormac]

During a time of crisis, Americans are supposed to rally around our leader. ISIS is calling OUR president out personally!

SUPPORT YOUR PRESIDENT!

In short. No. He lost my support when he lost his backbone. As far is his speech is concerned:


Emily ‏@EmilyChanda 58m
"This speech is supposed to be about ISIS but idk Wtf I'm doing there so lemme talk about the economy and Ebola" #whatobamameant

Expand

• Reply
• Retweet
• Favorite

 

[shart_attack]

During a time of crisis, Americans are supposed to rally around our leader. ISIS is calling OUR president out personally!

SUPPORT YOUR PRESIDENT!

I will support him when he actually supports America instead of leading according to poll numbers.

He. Will. Never. Do. That. Ever.

 

[TemplarKormac]

We have no leader. We have a Manchurian candidate for the socialist movement. We have a President that truly dislikes America. We have a President that seeks ways to circumvent our Constitution. What's to support about him?

I hear he is also a space lizard, hellbent on destroying Earth.

Are we talking about the Kree and the Skrull here?

 

[AvgGuyIA]

During a time of crisis, Americans are supposed to rally around our leader. ISIS is calling OUR president out personally!

SUPPORT YOUR PRESIDENT!

I hope he's embarrassed from all this.

 

[Wyld Kard]

During a time of crisis, Americans are supposed to rally around our leader. ISIS is calling OUR president out personally!

SUPPORT YOUR PRESIDENT!

I will support him when he actually supports America instead of leading according to poll numbers.

That's wishful thinking!

 

[Black_Man1]

I thought it was a good speech. He didn't try to scare us ing

 

[AmericanFirst]

During a time of crisis, Americans are supposed to rally around our leader. ISIS is calling OUR president out personally!

SUPPORT YOUR PRESIDENT!

I will support him when he actually supports America instead of leading according to poll numbers.

That's wishful thinking!

I know.

 

[AmericanFirst]

I thought it was a good speech. He didn't try to scare us ing

He couldn't scare a mouse. He is pathetic.

 

[norwegen]

During a time of crisis, Americans are supposed to rally around our leader. ISIS is calling OUR president out personally!

SUPPORT YOUR PRESIDENT!

I hope he's embarrassed from all this.

Liberals should be embarrassed. That entire mongrel class clamored for American troop withdrawals during the Bush years. "Bring our troops home!" they cried.

This whole affair is one more example of their shortsightedness.

 

[aaronleland]

Are we talking about the Kree and the Skrull here?

You nerd!

Damn it! I got the reference.

 

[JWBooth]

I thought it was a good speech. He didn't try to scare us ing

Of course you did.

 

[JWBooth]

Those playing the "I", "Me", drinking game won't be posting till sometime tomorrow evening.
(based on the outtakes I have seen so far)

 

[jasonnfree]

Black man, you sure know how to jump start the hate. These loons are still angry that Obama won the white house twice and America seems to be doing ok even with all the roadblocks they put in front of him.