Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That said, Mueller's crooks could easily obtain all customer credit card charges that were processed through the hotel.
By who's motherfucking authority, indeed..."District of Columbia" as plaintiff?...By whose authority?
Not sure if this is part of the Mueller investigation or not.
Keep in mind that the reason Trump’s name is on the subpoena MAY be because he’s President and records of the Executive Branch are being subpoenaed. Dunno. Good to see his name on a subpoena though. We’ll probably see a lot more of them. LOL
If he committed a crime, absolutelyNot sure if this is part of the Mueller investigation or not.
Keep in mind that the reason Trump’s name is on the subpoena MAY be because he’s President and records of the Executive Branch are being subpoenaed. Dunno. Good to see his name on a subpoena though. We’ll probably see a lot more of them. LOL
Would it have been good to see Obama's name on a subpoena?
He did commit a crime.If he committed a crime, absolutelyNot sure if this is part of the Mueller investigation or not.
Keep in mind that the reason Trump’s name is on the subpoena MAY be because he’s President and records of the Executive Branch are being subpoenaed. Dunno. Good to see his name on a subpoena though. We’ll probably see a lot more of them. LOL
Would it have been good to see Obama's name on a subpoena?
Yeah...Which is why it seems fake to me.By who's motherfucking authority, indeed..."District of Columbia" as plaintiff?...By whose authority?
It's the District of Maryland federal court, dude.Where is the link?
Oh, never mind! There is so much shit wrong on that half a page that anyone with an IQ above Nancy Pelosi knows it is wrong.
How can the city of Washing DC sue in a Maryland court?
He did commit a crime.If he committed a crime, absolutelyNot sure if this is part of the Mueller investigation or not.
Keep in mind that the reason Trump’s name is on the subpoena MAY be because he’s President and records of the Executive Branch are being subpoenaed. Dunno. Good to see his name on a subpoena though. We’ll probably see a lot more of them. LOL
Would it have been good to see Obama's name on a subpoena?
You didn't answer the question, young bloodYeah...Which is why it seems fake to me.By who's motherfucking authority, indeed..."District of Columbia" as plaintiff?...By whose authority?
The corporate entity known as "District of Columbia" has Donald J Trump as its CEO...His DOJ is the agent authorized to file legal actions in the name of the corporation.You didn't answer the question, young bloodYeah...Which is why it seems fake to me.By who's motherfucking authority, indeed..."District of Columbia" as plaintiff?...By whose authority?
It's NOT Mueller, it is the State of Maryland that is suing him for breaking the emoluments clause of the constitutionNot sure if this is part of the Mueller investigation or not.
Keep in mind that the reason Trump’s name is on the subpoena MAY be because he’s President and records of the Executive Branch are being subpoenaed. Dunno. Good to see his name on a subpoena though. We’ll probably see a lot more of them. LOL
How can the State of Maryland file as plaintiff under the auspices of "District of Columbia"?It's NOT Mueller, it is the State of Maryland that is suing him for breaking the emoluments clause of the constitutionNot sure if this is part of the Mueller investigation or not.
Keep in mind that the reason Trump’s name is on the subpoena MAY be because he’s President and records of the Executive Branch are being subpoenaed. Dunno. Good to see his name on a subpoena though. We’ll probably see a lot more of them. LOL
http://oag.dc.gov/sites/default/files/2018-03/Trump-Amended-Complaint.pdf
Five Things You Didn’t Know About the Emoluments Clause
4. It might not even apply to the president.
Even though the DOJ letter regarding Obama’s acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize said the president “surely” holds an “office of profit or trust” under the United States, not all constitutional scholars agree.
University of Chicago Law School constitutional law professor William Baudeexplains in The Journal of Things We Like (Lots) that “office” and “officer” may not have a static meaning in the Constitution. He points to the emoluments clause as an example.
“President George Washington publicly received gifts from French officials (the key to the French Bastille and a portrait of Louis XVI) without asking Congress’s permission,” Baude wrote. “This suggests that he was not subject to the Foreign Emoluments Clause, which applies to a ‘Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States].’ ”
He also notes that “in 1792, Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton was instructed to report to the Senate ‘every’ person holding ‘office … under the United States’ and their salaries. His ninety-page list included every appointed officer, including those in the legislature, such as the Clerk of the House, but excluded elected officials such as the President, Vice President, and members of Congress.”
“This suggests that some definitions of office will turn on whether one is elected rather than which branch one is in,” Baude wrote.
Five Things You Didn’t Know About the Emoluments Clause
It's NOT Mueller, it is the State of Maryland that is suing him for breaking the emoluments clause of the constitutionNot sure if this is part of the Mueller investigation or not.
Keep in mind that the reason Trump’s name is on the subpoena MAY be because he’s President and records of the Executive Branch are being subpoenaed. Dunno. Good to see his name on a subpoena though. We’ll probably see a lot more of them. LOL
http://oag.dc.gov/sites/default/files/2018-03/Trump-Amended-Complaint.pdf
