Stomping Rand Paul Supporter Wants Victim To Apologize To Him

Meister has been and continues to excuse and dismiss Profitt's REPREHENSIBLE actions.
Anyone that uses the word, "but" describing what went down here is a DEFENDER of madness!

They do it all the time,

Beck: "I'm not saying he's a racist, BUT...he has a deep seated dislike of white people."

Meister & his ilk: "What happened to the woman was wrong, yes, BUT...she was looking for trouble and had it coming."O'Reilly does the "but" nonsense practically every night on air.

It never stops with these Klowns.

I want you to answer this, marcatl....did I say what is bolden, or are you a ******* liar?
No where have I defended the guy's actions.....not one post of mine have I even suggested his actions were justified.
I am pointing out that this girl wasn't an innocent bystander.
You have proven yourself to be one ******* liar, marcatl.

Really? Then explain THIS...: (Post #3 of this thread...#3!!!)
I think most know that the head stomping was out of line and will probably be dealt with in a Civil court. I have no idea if he will be brought up on criminal charges...if he was I would be good with it.
But the "victim" wasn't so innocent herself and she could have legal issues also. She shoved the poster she was carrying into Paul's face through an open window. I really can't feel too sorry for her.

What do the highlighted and bolded mean?

Words like "but," phrases such as "I really can't feel too sorry for her," putting the word "victim," into quotes and suggesting or just plain outright lying about the victim and saying she shoved or was about to shove some sign in the politician's face with no PROOF of it are things that not only SUGGEST, but are ACTUALLY DEFENSE of the reprehensible act. In essence you really SUPPORT the violence that was committed against the poor lady.

MAN UP Meister!!!!

I can't believe they put such SOBs as ....you know what, I'll leave that alone.

*SMH*

Obviously, your education failed to teach you comprehension of the English language.
Too bad you didn't put more of an effort into that, than the racism and hating you do.
 
I want you to answer this, marcatl....did I say what is bolden, or are you a ******* liar?
No where have I defended the guy's actions.....not one post of mine have I even suggested his actions were justified.
I am pointing out that this girl wasn't an innocent bystander.
You have proven yourself to be one ******* liar, marcatl.

Really? Then explain THIS...: (Post #3 of this thread...#3!!!)
I think most know that the head stomping was out of line and will probably be dealt with in a Civil court. I have no idea if he will be brought up on criminal charges...if he was I would be good with it.
But the "victim" wasn't so innocent herself and she could have legal issues also. She shoved the poster she was carrying into Paul's face through an open window. I really can't feel too sorry for her.

What do the highlighted and bolded mean?

Words like "but," phrases such as "I really can't feel too sorry for her," putting the word "victim," into quotes and suggesting or just plain outright lying about the victim and saying she shoved or was about to shove some sign in the politician's face with no PROOF of it are things that not only SUGGEST, but are ACTUALLY DEFENSE of the reprehensible act. In essence you really SUPPORT the violence that was committed against the poor lady.

MAN UP Meister!!!!

I can't believe they put such SOBs as ....you know what, I'll leave that alone.

*SMH*

Obviously, your education failed to teach you comprehension of the English language.
Too bad you didn't put more of an effort into that, then the racism and hating you do.
I'm sorry, but he has a valid point...you were definitely inferring that she deserved what she got and was not a real victim ("victim") at all.
 
Really? Then explain THIS...: (Post #3 of this thread...#3!!!)


What do the highlighted and bolded mean?

Words like "but," phrases such as "I really can't feel too sorry for her," putting the word "victim," into quotes and suggesting or just plain outright lying about the victim and saying she shoved or was about to shove some sign in the politician's face with no PROOF of it are things that not only SUGGEST, but are ACTUALLY DEFENSE of the reprehensible act. In essence you really SUPPORT the violence that was committed against the poor lady.

MAN UP Meister!!!!

I can't believe they put such SOBs as ....you know what, I'll leave that alone.

*SMH*

Obviously, your education failed to teach you comprehension of the English language.
Too bad you didn't put more of an effort into that, then the racism and hating you do.
I'm sorry, but he has a valid point...you were definitely inferring that she deserved what she got and was not a real victim ("victim") at all.

She put herself out there, and did what she did, Bo. If she was on the sidelines with a sign, she would have been a complete victim.....but she didn't do that, and for some reason none of you can even admit that part of it. I did not infer she should have had her head stomped, I made that completely clear. But, She Was Not Completely Innocent. Incredible!!!!!!!
 
Obviously, your education failed to teach you comprehension of the English language.
Too bad you didn't put more of an effort into that, then the racism and hating you do.
I'm sorry, but he has a valid point...you were definitely inferring that she deserved what she got and was not a real victim ("victim") at all.

She put herself out there, and did what she did, Bo. If she was on the sidelines with a sign, she would have been a complete victim.....but she didn't do that, and for some reason none of you can even admit that part of it. I did not infer she should have had her head stomped, I made that completely clear. But, She Was Not Completely Innocent. Incredible!!!!!!!

And you quantify again. This is like the rape victim who dresses sexy....and has to hold some of the blame. Seriously, folks.
 
I'm sorry, but he has a valid point...you were definitely inferring that she deserved what she got and was not a real victim ("victim") at all.

She put herself out there, and did what she did, Bo. If she was on the sidelines with a sign, she would have been a complete victim.....but she didn't do that, and for some reason none of you can even admit that part of it. I did not infer she should have had her head stomped, I made that completely clear. But, She Was Not Completely Innocent. Incredible!!!!!!!

And you quantify again. This is like the rape victim who dresses sexy....and has to hold some of the blame. Seriously, folks.

And you can't admit the truth that she did something wrong, also....This is exactly what I'm talking about, Bo. Thank you for proving my point. Sticking a sign into the face of Paul through an open window of the vehicle is not like dressing sexy. It's more like simple assault
 
Damn,the Moveon.org Dummies sure are milking the hell out of this one huh? Look it's real simple,no one with any common sense feels sorry for their despicable troll who got stomped. The creep wasn't even from Kentucky. She was flown in from Massachusetts by Moveon.org to cause problems. She is also likely to be a convicted Felon very soon. She's no Saint. Moveon.org can go on whining for sympathy but they shouldn't expect it. Hate always begets hate and they're the biggest Hate Mongers in this country. So sympathy? No way. Not gonna happen. So quit milking.
 
Go to my first post, Cuyo. I explained everything...it's about the 3-4 post in this thread.
It was more than just showing a sign Cuyo....you will deny that until your dying day...I know it. Something as simple as throwing water on a person is an assault....did you know that? I've told you and I've told everyone else where I stand, and yet you buffoons want to condone what she did is just beyond me unless your just a partisan hack. If the same thing happened to your messiah, you would have been all over that sign carrier. And don't insult me that you wouldn't have.

I don't have a messiah, please do not condescend to me.

And likewise, if this was 2 black men in Obama T-Shirts, one holding down a white, female Teabagger and the other stomping her while held down, the entire right would be having collective kittens right now. The 2 Obama supporters would be in jail, and you can damn sure bet nobody would blame the woman... Not from your side, and not from mine.

YES or NO, do you think Profitt should do jail time.

First, yes, if convicted(I think he will be convicted if it goes to trial) should do what is mandated by the conviction....I don't know what the going jail time is or what the charge has been brought against him.
I feel that any one....black, latino, white, asian, republican, democrat, liberal, conservative, athiest, agnotstic, christian, jew......It would have been wrong.
You still will not admit that she commited a simple assault, can you, Cuyo? Restraining her was proper, but the stomp was way out of line and should be dealt with accordingly.

Hand to God, I saw nothing indicating assault on her part. Maybe she was being rude but that's about it.
 
Damn,the Moveon.org Dummies sure are milking the hell out of this one huh? Look it's real simple,no one with any common sense feels sorry for their despicable troll who got stomped. The creep wasn't even from Kentucky. She was flown in from Massachusetts by Moveon.org to cause problems. She is also likely to be a convicted Felon very soon. She's no Saint. Moveon.org can go on whining for sympathy but they shouldn't expect it. Hate always begets hate and they're the biggest Hate Mongers in this country. So sympathy? No way. Not gonna happen. So quit milking.

We all know you are in favor of beating women. You keep repeating your desire to beat the shit out of women. I think you need to turn yourself in for your prior assaults or simply as a preemptive cautionary measure.
 
Oh MOVE ON you Moveon.org Drama Queens! Most Americans could care less that this despicable little troll got her ass kicked. You guys got about one more day to milk this one so you better get to work. No one cares. MOVE ON!
 
Oh MOVE ON you Moveon.org Drama Queens! Most Americans could care less that this despicable little troll got her ass kicked. You guys got about one more day to milk this one so you better get to work. No one cares. MOVE ON!

I couldn't give a rats arse about move on.....the larger point is you endorse beating women. You will get zero action beating up women.....maybe you don't even care. Maybe you have deeper seeded issues. Edited by Intense Is that wrong of me to say to someone who endorses the systematic group beatings of women? Don't muslim extremist beat women? Do you dare explain why you beat women?
 
LOL! What a bunch of whiny Drama Queens! This woman is heinous. Seriously,MOVE ON!!!
 
I don't have a messiah, please do not condescend to me.

And likewise, if this was 2 black men in Obama T-Shirts, one holding down a white, female Teabagger and the other stomping her while held down, the entire right would be having collective kittens right now. The 2 Obama supporters would be in jail, and you can damn sure bet nobody would blame the woman... Not from your side, and not from mine.

YES or NO, do you think Profitt should do jail time.

First, yes, if convicted(I think he will be convicted if it goes to trial) should do what is mandated by the conviction....I don't know what the going jail time is or what the charge has been brought against him.
I feel that any one....black, latino, white, asian, republican, democrat, liberal, conservative, athiest, agnotstic, christian, jew......It would have been wrong.
You still will not admit that she commited a simple assault, can you, Cuyo? Restraining her was proper, but the stomp was way out of line and should be dealt with accordingly.

Hand to God, I saw nothing indicating assault on her part. Maybe she was being rude but that's about it.

Apparently you need to see an eye dr. She turned the sign around and stuck it through the window, and Paul flinched. I'm not going to try and change you mind, because I know I can't. But there is simple assault there.

Assault: an unlawful act that places another person, without that person's consent, in fear of immediate bodily harm or battery.
Simple assault - definition of Simple assault in the Medical dictionary - by the Free Online Medical Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
 
First, yes, if convicted(I think he will be convicted if it goes to trial) should do what is mandated by the conviction....I don't know what the going jail time is or what the charge has been brought against him.
I feel that any one....black, latino, white, asian, republican, democrat, liberal, conservative, athiest, agnotstic, christian, jew......It would have been wrong.
You still will not admit that she commited a simple assault, can you, Cuyo? Restraining her was proper, but the stomp was way out of line and should be dealt with accordingly.

Hand to God, I saw nothing indicating assault on her part. Maybe she was being rude but that's about it.

Apparently you need to see an eye dr. She turned the sign around and stuck it through the window, and Paul flinched. I'm not going to try and change you mind, because I know I can't. But there is simple assault there.

Assault: an unlawful act that places another person, without that person's consent, in fear of immediate bodily harm or battery.
Simple assault - definition of Simple assault in the Medical dictionary - by the Free Online Medical Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.

she did not stick the sign through the window... she got up close and then they dragged her out and attacked her

i'd be really disappointed if you thought this was ok. did you bother watching the video at all? the disgusting fat piece of trash stomped on her head while she was restrained and on the floor.
 
Watch the video...


[youtube]yiLeud-sxrM&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]


You see that buffer zone around the SUV (not a limo)...once she violates that security buffer, she is instantly perceived as a threat.

Look at the slow motion of Rand Paul in the passenger seat...he jerks away...clearly threaten by her actions.

We can all Monday morning quarterback the instant replay, but any reasonable person could have been expected to react by restraining that woman, regardless of whether the threat was real or perceived.

Everything that transpired with Profitt after she was on the ground was an uncalled for assault, but the events that led up to that point were entirely reasonable.

Edit - that last sentence is not well worded...The REACTIONS were entirely reasonable.

Jillian...here is a slow-mo of just what happened. She clearly sticks the sign through the window...and notice Rand Paul flinched.
No way did I ever condone the stomping on her head or neck. I have never waivered from prosecuting the person who committed the assault on her.
 
15th post
LOL! What a bunch of whiny Drama Queens! This woman is heinous. Seriously,MOVE ON!!!

Beat the shit? Edited by Intense
:lol:

I'm a Muslim. Women who misbehave should always be beaten. This woman was clearly out of line. Allah demands that she receive a Beat-Down. And that's exactly what she got. Praise be Allah.

LOL, how crafty. You hide your true feelings of despise towards women cloaked in what I believe is just another bullshit religion. Your still a woman hating living in your mothers basement mashpotato shaped *****.
 
All women should be subservient to their men. They shall be beaten if they are petulant. This woman should receive the lash. Thus it is written in the Koran. Praise be Allah.
 
:lol:
All women should be subservient to their men. They shall be beaten if they are petulant. This woman should receive the lash. Thus it is written in the Koran. Praise be Allah.
:lol:

Honey, do you want applesauce with your pork chops?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom