The trial was about the lies of Christian fundies trying to present ID'iosy as science, when it is clearly not.why....the judges involved in the Dover case didn't have one.....You should read the Dover transcript so you would have a clue.
.
As I asked in a different thread, if Dover wasn't about using pseudoscience to shoehorn Christianity into the science class, why did the school board use a law firm that bills itself as "the sword and shield for people of faith"?
a much better question.....why did the judge think that abiogenesis was "science".......did no one think to explain it to him?.......