What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Step #1: BREAKING: Dr. Peter Daszak Removed from Covid-19 Commission

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
69,125
Reaction score
31,274
Points
2,290
Location
Left Coast, Classified
While authoring the ‘it’s a conspiracy to think the ChiCom Flu is manmade’ lie narrative, it has been exposed that he was directly involved with the lab prior.

 

pknopp

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
32,133
Reaction score
9,204
Points
1,290
He should be ostracized from the medical community.
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
167,655
Reaction score
27,061
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri

Lesh

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
26,404
Reaction score
8,568
Points
910
He was (rightly) recused because of the potential appearance of a conflict of interest.

They are investigating how the virus originated. Since the lab was working with strains similar to that which began this pandemic, of course it needs to be looked at.

And if they find that it was developed in the lab and escaped, that will point out the dangers of doing work with pathogens as deadly as this.

Outside the QAnon looney right, there is NO real consideration that IF there was a release from this lab, that it was intentional
 

pknopp

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
32,133
Reaction score
9,204
Points
1,290
He was (rightly) recused because of the potential appearance of a conflict of interest.

They are investigating how the virus originated. Since the lab was working with strains similar to that which began this pandemic, of course it needs to be looked at.

And if they find that it was developed in the lab and escaped, that will point out the dangers of doing work with pathogens as deadly as this.

Outside the QAnon looney right, there is NO real consideration that IF there was a release from this lab, that it was intentional

IMO irrelevant. We banned this kind of work in the U.S. so intentional or not it shouldn't be done.

Intentional or not those who supported, worked on or funded the research are culpable.
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
167,655
Reaction score
27,061
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri
He was (rightly) recused because of the potential appearance of a conflict of interest.

They are investigating how the virus originated. Since the lab was working with strains similar to that which began this pandemic, of course it needs to be looked at.

And if they find that it was developed in the lab and escaped, that will point out the dangers of doing work with pathogens as deadly as this.

Outside the QAnon looney right, there is NO real consideration that IF there was a release from this lab, that it was intentional
How else would we find vaccines for pathogens if research is not done?
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
27,467
Reaction score
22,983
Points
2,415
He was (rightly) recused because of the potential appearance of a conflict of interest.

They are investigating how the virus originated. Since the lab was working with strains similar to that which began this pandemic, of course it needs to be looked at.

And if they find that it was developed in the lab and escaped, that will point out the dangers of doing work with pathogens as deadly as this.

Outside the QAnon looney right, there is NO real consideration that IF there was a release from this lab, that it was intentional
"Potential appearance of a conflict of interest"??????????????????? :auiqs.jpg:

Yer cute.
 
OP
Weatherman2020

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
69,125
Reaction score
31,274
Points
2,290
Location
Left Coast, Classified
He was (rightly) recused because of the potential appearance of a conflict of interest.

They are investigating how the virus originated. Since the lab was working with strains similar to that which began this pandemic, of course it needs to be looked at.

And if they find that it was developed in the lab and escaped, that will point out the dangers of doing work with pathogens as deadly as this.

Outside the QAnon looney right, there is NO real consideration that IF there was a release from this lab, that it was intentional
Why was he the only American representative to visit the lab to determine if it was manmade without disclosing his links prior? Then he creates the lie that it was not manmade.
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
167,655
Reaction score
27,061
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri
He was (rightly) recused because of the potential appearance of a conflict of interest.

They are investigating how the virus originated. Since the lab was working with strains similar to that which began this pandemic, of course it needs to be looked at.

And if they find that it was developed in the lab and escaped, that will point out the dangers of doing work with pathogens as deadly as this.

Outside the QAnon looney right, there is NO real consideration that IF there was a release from this lab, that it was intentional
"Potential appearance of a conflict of interest"??????????????????? :auiqs.jpg:

Yer cute.
That is what the article linked stated Einstein.
 

pknopp

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
32,133
Reaction score
9,204
Points
1,290
He was (rightly) recused because of the potential appearance of a conflict of interest.

They are investigating how the virus originated. Since the lab was working with strains similar to that which began this pandemic, of course it needs to be looked at.

And if they find that it was developed in the lab and escaped, that will point out the dangers of doing work with pathogens as deadly as this.

Outside the QAnon looney right, there is NO real consideration that IF there was a release from this lab, that it was intentional
How else would we find vaccines for pathogens if research is not done?

You don't need to create new viruses. There is a reason it was banned in the U.S.
 

Lesh

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
26,404
Reaction score
8,568
Points
910
IMO irrelevant. We banned this kind of work in the U.S. so intentional or not it shouldn't be done.
Do you have a link to that?
How else would we find vaccines for pathogens if research is not done?
Yea really...
Why was he the only American representative to visit the lab to determine if it was manmade without disclosing his links prior? Then he creates the lie that it was not manmade.
I'm not sure the bold ids accurate but questions like that are exactly why he was recused. The investigation continues.
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
27,467
Reaction score
22,983
Points
2,415
He was (rightly) recused because of the potential appearance of a conflict of interest.

They are investigating how the virus originated. Since the lab was working with strains similar to that which began this pandemic, of course it needs to be looked at.

And if they find that it was developed in the lab and escaped, that will point out the dangers of doing work with pathogens as deadly as this.

Outside the QAnon looney right, there is NO real consideration that IF there was a release from this lab, that it was intentional
"Potential appearance of a conflict of interest"??????????????????? :auiqs.jpg:

Yer cute.
That is what the article linked stated Einstein.
They're cute too. :auiqs.jpg:
 

pknopp

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
32,133
Reaction score
9,204
Points
1,290
IMO irrelevant. We banned this kind of work in the U.S. so intentional or not it shouldn't be done.
Do you have a link to that?

Sorry, we ended funding and told the scientists to knock it off.

U.S. halts funding for new risky virus studies, calls for voluntary moratorium

It is halting all federal funding for so-called gain-of-function (GOF) studies that alter a pathogen to make it more transmissible or deadly

This is why the research went to China. The same thing that happens to a company that is told that they can no longer pour their waste into the rivers.

Fauci said the research was worth the risk of a pandemic. Was it?
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
167,655
Reaction score
27,061
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri
IMO irrelevant. We banned this kind of work in the U.S. so intentional or not it shouldn't be done.
Do you have a link to that?

Sorry, we ended funding and told the scientists to knock it off.

U.S. halts funding for new risky virus studies, calls for voluntary moratorium

It is halting all federal funding for so-called gain-of-function (GOF) studies that alter a pathogen to make it more transmissible or deadly

This is why the research went to China. The same thing that happens to a company that is told that they can no longer pour their waste into the rivers.

Fauci said the research was worth the risk of a pandemic. Was it?
Then why did the Trump administration revive the funding for the activity?
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$350.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top