State Farm canceled 70% of its fire insurance coverage in Pacific Palisades last July

odanny

Diamond Member
Joined
May 7, 2017
Messages
22,288
Reaction score
18,004
Points
2,290
Location
Midwest - Trumplandia
This is a huge win for State Farm, someone responsible for this is surely getting promoted. There was coverage available thru the state, but it was 4x as expensive and offered less coverage.

I'm not even sure State Farm offers coverage in much of coastal Florida anymore.

 
This is a huge win for State Farm, someone responsible for this is surely getting promoted. There was coverage available thru the state, but it was 4x as expensive and offered less coverage.

I'm not even sure State Farm offers coverage in much of coastal Florida anymore.


Can't blame them, considering the obvious risks.
 
Last edited:
The risk was more than Jake from State Farm was willing to accept.

State Farm is a business, not a government agency and not a charity.

And they were proved right.

BTW, the homeowners had 6 months to make other provisions
The whole neighborhood would have had do fireproofing in order to (hopefully) be effective. But that would be like herding cats.
 
I do believe that a blind man can see the contrast of a private company protecting the shareholders investment, and
the federal government throwing tax dollars into the fire.
The fire couldn't have been avoided, but the extent of the damage sure could have been reduced immensely.
 
If it was in the policy contract allowing them to cancel then the property owners more than likely have no case against them.
It is sad situation and charity and government needs to do what they can. I have been told that certain groups lobbied and stopped any attempt at fire prevention like cutting firebreaks in the brush lands near residential areas.
 
Last edited:
This is a huge win for State Farm, someone responsible for this is surely getting promoted. There was coverage available thru the state, but it was 4x as expensive and offered less coverage.

I'm not even sure State Farm offers coverage in much of coastal Florida anymore.


/—-/ Mike Johnson says no aid without reform.
 
1736873607349.webp


~S~
 
The risk was more than Jake from State Farm was willing to accept.

State Farm is a business, not a government agency and not a charity.

And they were proved right.

BTW, the homeowners had 6 months to make other provisions
Reports are that many homeowners did not have insurance

Which I believe is impossible if there is a mortgage on the house because banks require insurance

It becomes an interesting question
 
If you make aid political it won't matter.
I think FEMA will provide temporary aid and comfort

But that does not mean giving california a trillion federal dollars to rebuild good as new
 
This is a huge win for State Farm, someone responsible for this is surely getting promoted. There was coverage available thru the state, but it was 4x as expensive and offered less coverage.

I'm not even sure State Farm offers coverage in much of coastal Florida anymore.



The difference is California made it very very difficult for the Insurance companies to raise rates to properly cover the risks.
 
Yup. California has basically lit a match and piled kindling against most of the SoCal cities.

It's fiscally irresponsible to insure people in that case.

The main irresponsibility is the State government of California telling insurance companies they can't follow their risk tables when it comes to rate increases.
 
Back
Top Bottom