Stanford scientists find the climate and health impacts of natural gas stoves are greater than previously thought

What "facts" defused it?
The fact that half a million cars are small consideration and the comparison is too.

Precisely 290,000,000 /500,000 = you do the math %.
Are you in denial or just incapable of understanding facts? Whatever it is, you are going to have to accept the responsibility for a stupid mistake.
 
The fact that half a million cars are small consideration and the comparison is too.

Precisely 290,000,000 /500,000 = you do the math %.
Are you in denial or just incapable of understanding facts? Whatever it is, you are going to have to accept the responsibility for a stupid mistake.
"Denial" of what fact?
 
Dang we are an embarrasisng country right now.
iu
 
First off this comes out of Stanford University...
And so it's completely crap.

Several things are assumed. Like leaks of methane gas from a gas stove. A "guessed" amount is multiplied and then compared. There's no facts whatsoever.

It's a garbage study.
 
First off this comes out of Stanford University...
And so it's completely crap.

Several things are assumed. Like leaks of methane gas from a gas stove. A "guessed" amount is multiplied and then compared. There's no facts whatsoever.

It's a garbage study.
It's equivalent to half a million cars in a country with 290,000,000 cars.
It's garbage because it was misdirected and mindless spam that wan't carefully considered as to it's relevance. That's called denial or de Nile in this case.
 
It's equivalent to half a million cars in a country with 290,000,000 cars.
It's garbage because it was misdirected and mindless spam that wan't carefully considered as to it's relevance. That's called denial or de Nile in this case.
You obviously didn't get the point of the article.
 
If your yellow circle graph is even accurate?
You have no appreciation of the required balance.
And even less appreciation of the fact that what is categorized as natural, fits into deforestation!

But none of that is of any importance to the denial side is it!
Fill your boots Beale, it will be a pleasure to take you down.
 
It's equivalent to half a million cars in a country with 290,000,000 cars.
It's garbage because it was misdirected and mindless spam that wan't carefully considered as to it's relevance. That's called denial or de Nile in this case.
There are likely a few clunker gas stoves about and in use...
But most are modern these days.

A modern gas stove doesn't need ventilation...no monoxide is created and it burns super clean. So this notion of leaking methane is BS. If a person doesn't mind the smell of Rotten Eggs... because they had the Rona... well there are other means of detection for leaks. Something similar to a smoke detector can be quite useful.
 
If your yellow circle graph is even accurate?
You have no appreciation of the required balance.
And even less appreciation of the fact that what is categorized as natural, fits into deforestation!

But none of that is of any importance to the denial side is it!
Fill your boots Beale, it will be a pleasure to take you down.
Actually, forests are growing, not shrinking. Added CO2 makes plants grow faster, moron.

Where's the "denial?" You're the one who believes the false claim that the planet is being deforested.
 
There are likely a few clunker gas stoves about and in use...
But most are modern these days.

A modern gas stove doesn't need ventilation...no monoxide is created and it burns super clean. So this notion of leaking methane is BS. If a person doesn't mind the smell of Rotten Eggs... because they had the Rona... well there are other means of detection for leaks. Something similar to a smoke detector can be quite useful.
My gas stove doesn't smell at all.
 
Actually, forests are growing, not shrinking. Added CO2 makes plants grow faster, moron.

Where's the "denial?" You're the one who believes the false claim that the planet is being deforested.

You're an angry little man who isn't concered with maintaining any credibility. You messed up with the b.s. on the gas stoves' significance and now you're messing up on the facts on shrinking forests.

You're not worthy of my attempts to correct your de Nile.

Go play.
 

You're an angry little man who isn't concered with maintaining any credibility. You messed up with the b.s. on the gas stoves' significance and now you're messing up on the facts on shrinking forests.

You're not worthy of my attempts to correct your de Nile.

Go play.
I didn't mess up a thing, moron.

Faster growing forests mean less greenhouse effect.

Forests could be growing faster now than they were 225 years ago as a result of global warming, a study has revealed.
The study, published on Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found evidence that trees in the eastern United States were growing at an accelerated rate due to the rising levels of atmospheric CO2, higher temperatures and longer growing seasons.
 
I didn't mess up a thing, moron.

Faster growing forests mean less greenhouse effect.

Forests could be growing faster now than they were 225 years ago as a result of global warming, a study has revealed.
The study, published on Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found evidence that trees in the eastern United States were growing at an accelerated rate due to the rising levels of atmospheric CO2, higher temperatures and longer growing seasons.
Worth my time to answer one more time, due to your ignorance on attempting to say something about rate of growth of forests, when held up against the amply stated and proven facts on overall deforestation. Three times lucky on stupidity for pissants!

Really now, go play!
 
Ever notice that the government comes out with some sort of environmental concern whenever Biden stumbles? Last week it was John Kerry issuing a global warming statement in the middle of a snow storm and now it's Stanford "scientists" sudden concern over natural gas stoves. I smell a rat or maybe it's just methane.
 

Forum List

Back
Top