Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know this is the standard Jewish response if you mention what the Jewish Bolsheviks did to the Christian Russians, that somehow the Russians had it coming because the Tsar, blah blah blah. They never offer any specifics or evidence. Yet, when you ask whether Jews played any role at all in becoming victims of the German Nazis' (much smaller) crimes, Jews act enraged that such an idea could even exist.Tell us how saddened you were by the 1,000 years of Jews being murdered for sport before the Bolsheviks came along.Let's not pretend Jews are these unflinching champions of historical truth-telling. Even now, if one brings up on this board the Jewish depredations under Bolshevism, the shrieks of Nazi! Fascist! come fast and furious, but never an acknowledgement of the Jewish genocide of white Christian Russians from our resident Holocaust deniers. Jewish Hollywood has been spewing a distorted and poisonous view of our national past for decades, yet I don't recall a single movie ever about Genrikh Yagoda, the Jewish head of the NKVD who alone was responsible for the deaths of ten million Christians.1) Jews have never denied all the other groups and the number of people who have died in WWII. On the other hand, Jew haters have done anything and everything to deny the number of Jews who were murdered by any means the Nazis and the Arab Jihadists could find AND on top of it, put the blame of the Holocaust on them.
Most left willingly even before the destruction of herds temple in 70 AD. Greener pastures, and the elites didn't want to go back to Palestine until workers went there and dug wells and paved roads.
Why not just let the Palestinians of Gaza walk out via Israel , obviously they do not want to be under sharia law (if Haaretz story is true and I'm not paying for s subscription) and would be oh so grateful for Israel to let them out, why make them pay Hamas, if Hamas has less money that is good is it not?
How dense can you be? Very.
Why doesn't Muslim Egypt let Muslim Gazans get out of Gaza via their crossing and let them catch a ship or plane out of Gaza?
And for free?
Israel is under no obligation to allow foreiners who may want to come into Israel to blow up the people of Israel and everything in it.
ALTHOUGH, Israel does allow Muslims both from Gaza and the "West Bank" to come to the Temple Mount during the month of Ramadan.
Something the Muslims do not return when it comes to allowing Jews visit their holy sites in Judea, Samaria, Jordan, etc.
Jews always have to do it at night and with the help of the IDF.
Look !!
The Muslims do not have to do it in the dead of night, and do not need any security. I wonder why that is ....
Last Year:
Israel opens door from Gaza to Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | The National
This year:
Palestinians pour into Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | Daily Mail Online
Tens of thousands of Palestinians poured into Jerusalem to attend the first Friday prayers of the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, Islam's third-holiest site, under heavy Israeli security.
------------------------------------
It is always important to point out that Jerusalem was never important on Ramadan or any other Muslim holiday until after the 1970s.
Could you tell you tell why?
Israel is the one who has them fenced in. Their mosque has been there longer than Solomon's temple which was most like the size of a small cabin , double hut size.
History Lesson:
First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE
Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE
Islam founded = 610 CE
First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)
-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?
Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?
"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?
The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.
There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."
BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon
Fred is a jerkWow, you are someone who threatens violence on the Internet, and you are calling HER weak and pathetic? LOLWho is a jew??
You don't even know who you're afraid of? That makes you seem kind of weak and pathetic, doesn't it?
Most left willingly even before the destruction of herds temple in 70 AD. Greener pastures, and the elites didn't want to go back to Palestine until workers went there and dug wells and paved roads.
Why not just let the Palestinians of Gaza walk out via Israel , obviously they do not want to be under sharia law (if Haaretz story is true and I'm not paying for s subscription) and would be oh so grateful for Israel to let them out, why make them pay Hamas, if Hamas has less money that is good is it not?
How dense can you be? Very.
Why doesn't Muslim Egypt let Muslim Gazans get out of Gaza via their crossing and let them catch a ship or plane out of Gaza?
And for free?
Israel is under no obligation to allow foreiners who may want to come into Israel to blow up the people of Israel and everything in it.
ALTHOUGH, Israel does allow Muslims both from Gaza and the "West Bank" to come to the Temple Mount during the month of Ramadan.
Something the Muslims do not return when it comes to allowing Jews visit their holy sites in Judea, Samaria, Jordan, etc.
Jews always have to do it at night and with the help of the IDF.
Look !!
The Muslims do not have to do it in the dead of night, and do not need any security. I wonder why that is ....
Last Year:
Israel opens door from Gaza to Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | The National
This year:
Palestinians pour into Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | Daily Mail Online
Tens of thousands of Palestinians poured into Jerusalem to attend the first Friday prayers of the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, Islam's third-holiest site, under heavy Israeli security.
------------------------------------
It is always important to point out that Jerusalem was never important on Ramadan or any other Muslim holiday until after the 1970s.
Could you tell you tell why?
Israel is the one who has them fenced in. Their mosque has been there longer than Solomon's temple which was most like the size of a small cabin , double hut size.
History Lesson:
First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE
Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE
Islam founded = 610 CE
First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)
-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?
Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?
"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?
The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.
There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."
BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon
Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?
The Arch of Titus, Rome
The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.
The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.
The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.
The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.
![]()
![]()
How dense can you be? Very.
Why doesn't Muslim Egypt let Muslim Gazans get out of Gaza via their crossing and let them catch a ship or plane out of Gaza?
And for free?
Israel is under no obligation to allow foreiners who may want to come into Israel to blow up the people of Israel and everything in it.
ALTHOUGH, Israel does allow Muslims both from Gaza and the "West Bank" to come to the Temple Mount during the month of Ramadan.
Something the Muslims do not return when it comes to allowing Jews visit their holy sites in Judea, Samaria, Jordan, etc.
Jews always have to do it at night and with the help of the IDF.
Look !!
The Muslims do not have to do it in the dead of night, and do not need any security. I wonder why that is ....
Last Year:
Israel opens door from Gaza to Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | The National
This year:
Palestinians pour into Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | Daily Mail Online
Tens of thousands of Palestinians poured into Jerusalem to attend the first Friday prayers of the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, Islam's third-holiest site, under heavy Israeli security.
------------------------------------
It is always important to point out that Jerusalem was never important on Ramadan or any other Muslim holiday until after the 1970s.
Could you tell you tell why?
Israel is the one who has them fenced in. Their mosque has been there longer than Solomon's temple which was most like the size of a small cabin , double hut size.
History Lesson:
First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE
Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE
Islam founded = 610 CE
First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)
-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?
Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?
"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?
The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.
There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."
BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon
Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?
The Arch of Titus, Rome
The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.
The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.
The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.
The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.
![]()
![]()
That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.
How dense can you be? Very.
Why doesn't Muslim Egypt let Muslim Gazans get out of Gaza via their crossing and let them catch a ship or plane out of Gaza?
And for free?
Israel is under no obligation to allow foreiners who may want to come into Israel to blow up the people of Israel and everything in it.
ALTHOUGH, Israel does allow Muslims both from Gaza and the "West Bank" to come to the Temple Mount during the month of Ramadan.
Something the Muslims do not return when it comes to allowing Jews visit their holy sites in Judea, Samaria, Jordan, etc.
Jews always have to do it at night and with the help of the IDF.
Look !!
The Muslims do not have to do it in the dead of night, and do not need any security. I wonder why that is ....
Last Year:
Israel opens door from Gaza to Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | The National
This year:
Palestinians pour into Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | Daily Mail Online
Tens of thousands of Palestinians poured into Jerusalem to attend the first Friday prayers of the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, Islam's third-holiest site, under heavy Israeli security.
------------------------------------
It is always important to point out that Jerusalem was never important on Ramadan or any other Muslim holiday until after the 1970s.
Could you tell you tell why?
Israel is the one who has them fenced in. Their mosque has been there longer than Solomon's temple which was most like the size of a small cabin , double hut size.
History Lesson:
First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE
Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE
Islam founded = 610 CE
First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)
-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?
Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?
"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?
The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.
There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."
BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon
Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?
The Arch of Titus, Rome
The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.
The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.
The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.
The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.
![]()
![]()
That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.
Israel is the one who has them fenced in. Their mosque has been there longer than Solomon's temple which was most like the size of a small cabin , double hut size.
History Lesson:
First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE
Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE
Islam founded = 610 CE
First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)
-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?
Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?
"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?
The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.
There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."
BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon
Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?
The Arch of Titus, Rome
The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.
The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.
The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.
The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.
![]()
![]()
That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.
I have surely never read from Iranians or Italians that they were the owners of the Temples in the land of Israel.
Lots of things were built in the Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Byzantine, Crusade and Ottoman eras in the Land of Israel.
Do you have a list of these governments saying that anything built during those eras belongs to them, and they want to take ownership of them?
Will you answer my question as to who are the Jews you are afraid of? You said so yourself .
What does " I am afraid of who is a Jew" mean?
Israel is the one who has them fenced in. Their mosque has been there longer than Solomon's temple which was most like the size of a small cabin , double hut size.
History Lesson:
First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE
Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE
Islam founded = 610 CE
First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)
-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?
Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?
"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?
The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.
There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."
BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon
Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?
The Arch of Titus, Rome
The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.
The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.
The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.
The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.
![]()
![]()
That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.
Could you clarify to me which Jewish groups were having a civil war with each other?
Are you telling us that there weren't three revolts against the Romans, and all of those wars were civil wars? Jews against Jews?
For what reason?
History Lesson:
First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE
Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE
Islam founded = 610 CE
First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)
-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?
Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?
"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?
The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.
There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."
BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon
Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?
The Arch of Titus, Rome
The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.
The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.
The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.
The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.
![]()
![]()
That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.
Could you clarify to me which Jewish groups were having a civil war with each other?
Are you telling us that there weren't three revolts against the Romans, and all of those wars were civil wars? Jews against Jews?
For what reason?
I suggest you read some history, start with Josephus war of the jews. Read roman history. Yes Jews killed Jews and fought amongst themselves.
History Crash Course #31: Herod the Great
While Herod was a Edomite turned Jew, he was also pro Roman. His building projects which put men to work, came mainly from Rome and trade, since Judea was a huge trade route. As long as the Judeans and Israelites behaved and didn't rob the traders, Rome was fine with them and left them alone.
"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?
The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.
There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."
BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon
Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?
The Arch of Titus, Rome
The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.
The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.
The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.
The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.
![]()
![]()
That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.
Could you clarify to me which Jewish groups were having a civil war with each other?
Are you telling us that there weren't three revolts against the Romans, and all of those wars were civil wars? Jews against Jews?
For what reason?
I suggest you read some history, start with Josephus war of the jews. Read roman history. Yes Jews killed Jews and fought amongst themselves.
I did not say that Jews did not fight Jews at some points, for one reason or another, during the Roman conquest.
You are not acknowledging the Three revolts against the Romans.
Herod restored the second temple, he did not build it from scratch.
The Romans lost that spoil a long time ago, and there hasn't been one Roman, or descendant, to this day who has come to claim anything built with "Roman Money" be it in the Land of Israel, or anywhere else the Romans had conquered.
The same goes for every one of the conquerors who came and went and built anything in the places they conquered.
It is not International Law that if you had once conquered a land, but not made a nation for yourself out of it, that everything built on it continues to belong to the descendants of those people.
Some Muslims are the only ones who think that way.
Some Muslims still consider Southern Spain, and Vienna, etc as theirs because "some" Muslims had once conquered the area.
The idea of Mosques existing before the Solomon Temples were built would be an Islamic idea.
To Islam Adam and Eve were Muslims, and so were all other beings.
Moses freed the Muslims out of Egypt.
All of the above are recent Muslim ideas in order to delegitimize the Jewish People/Nation.
The fact that some in the world, like you, believes and spreads these beliefs (and that is all they are) does not change the history of the world, or the History of the Jewish People on their ancient land.
PS, there were no "Israelites" at the time of the Romans.
Read Josephus's book. Read Jewish History books.
I am sure that you have heard these stories from others, from your family, from church (or wherever you go), or any group which is anti Israel and Jews.
But actually READ any of those books?
Your attempt to pass things which never happened as true does not work in the real world.
And Israel and the Jews will continue to strive in spite of all the fear and hatred you have learned to have towards them.
Am Israel Chai
History Crash Course #31: Herod the Great
While Herod was a Edomite turned Jew, he was also pro Roman. His building projects which put men to work, came mainly from Rome and trade, since Judea was a huge trade route. As long as the Judeans and Israelites behaved and didn't rob the traders, Rome was fine with them and left them alone.
Nowhere on Aish.com article you posted the link for, does it refer to Jews AND Israelites.
Read some Jewish History books, instead of simply repeating what you have heard from others who "fear" Jews, or books and sites where all they promote is "fear" of Jews.
they buy from us and nukes and nuclear subs
they buy from us and nukes and nuclear subs
Actually ... Israeli nuclear weapons were developed in Israel and they have no nuclear submarines. The IN has Dolphin-class diesel submarines. A nuclear submarines only real advantage is time on station, they can stay submerged on station for months at a time. However, in the tiny Mediterranean, the much more silent diesel is a better choice.
History Crash Course #31: Herod the Great
While Herod was a Edomite turned Jew, he was also pro Roman. His building projects which put men to work, came mainly from Rome and trade, since Judea was a huge trade route. As long as the Judeans and Israelites behaved and didn't rob the traders, Rome was fine with them and left them alone.