Stand up and be counted ...

Are anti-Israel/anti-Jewish posters overwhelmingly ...

  • Pro-Trump

    Votes: 1 6.7%
  • Anti-Trump

    Votes: 14 93.3%

  • Total voters
    15
Status
Not open for further replies.
1) Jews have never denied all the other groups and the number of people who have died in WWII. On the other hand, Jew haters have done anything and everything to deny the number of Jews who were murdered by any means the Nazis and the Arab Jihadists could find AND on top of it, put the blame of the Holocaust on them.
Let's not pretend Jews are these unflinching champions of historical truth-telling. Even now, if one brings up on this board the Jewish depredations under Bolshevism, the shrieks of Nazi! Fascist! come fast and furious, but never an acknowledgement of the Jewish genocide of white Christian Russians from our resident Holocaust deniers. Jewish Hollywood has been spewing a distorted and poisonous view of our national past for decades, yet I don't recall a single movie ever about Genrikh Yagoda, the Jewish head of the NKVD who alone was responsible for the deaths of ten million Christians.
Tell us how saddened you were by the 1,000 years of Jews being murdered for sport before the Bolsheviks came along.
I know this is the standard Jewish response if you mention what the Jewish Bolsheviks did to the Christian Russians, that somehow the Russians had it coming because the Tsar, blah blah blah. They never offer any specifics or evidence. Yet, when you ask whether Jews played any role at all in becoming victims of the German Nazis' (much smaller) crimes, Jews act enraged that such an idea could even exist.

It's like a kind of sickness. I think this guy provides a clue where it comes from.

 
Most left willingly even before the destruction of herds temple in 70 AD. Greener pastures, and the elites didn't want to go back to Palestine until workers went there and dug wells and paved roads.

Why not just let the Palestinians of Gaza walk out via Israel , obviously they do not want to be under sharia law (if Haaretz story is true and I'm not paying for s subscription) and would be oh so grateful for Israel to let them out, why make them pay Hamas, if Hamas has less money that is good is it not?

How dense can you be? Very.

Why doesn't Muslim Egypt let Muslim Gazans get out of Gaza via their crossing and let them catch a ship or plane out of Gaza?
And for free?

Israel is under no obligation to allow foreiners who may want to come into Israel to blow up the people of Israel and everything in it.

ALTHOUGH, Israel does allow Muslims both from Gaza and the "West Bank" to come to the Temple Mount during the month of Ramadan.
Something the Muslims do not return when it comes to allowing Jews visit their holy sites in Judea, Samaria, Jordan, etc.
Jews always have to do it at night and with the help of the IDF.

Look !!
The Muslims do not have to do it in the dead of night, and do not need any security. I wonder why that is ....

Last Year:
Israel opens door from Gaza to Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | The National

This year:
Palestinians pour into Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | Daily Mail Online

Tens of thousands of Palestinians poured into Jerusalem to attend the first Friday prayers of the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, Islam's third-holiest site, under heavy Israeli security.
------------------------------------

It is always important to point out that Jerusalem was never important on Ramadan or any other Muslim holiday until after the 1970s.

Could you tell you tell why?


Israel is the one who has them fenced in. Their mosque has been there longer than Solomon's temple which was most like the size of a small cabin , double hut size.


History Lesson:

First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE

Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE

Islam founded = 610 CE

First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)

-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?

Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?


"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?

The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.

There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."

BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon

Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?

The Arch of Titus, Rome

The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.

The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.

The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.

The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.

1662px-TitusbogenFront.jpg


1440px-Carrying_off_the_Menorah_from_the_Temple_in_Jerusalem_depicted_on_a_frieze_on_the_Arch_of_Titus_in_the_Forum_Romanum.JPG


 
Most left willingly even before the destruction of herds temple in 70 AD. Greener pastures, and the elites didn't want to go back to Palestine until workers went there and dug wells and paved roads.

Why not just let the Palestinians of Gaza walk out via Israel , obviously they do not want to be under sharia law (if Haaretz story is true and I'm not paying for s subscription) and would be oh so grateful for Israel to let them out, why make them pay Hamas, if Hamas has less money that is good is it not?

How dense can you be? Very.

Why doesn't Muslim Egypt let Muslim Gazans get out of Gaza via their crossing and let them catch a ship or plane out of Gaza?
And for free?

Israel is under no obligation to allow foreiners who may want to come into Israel to blow up the people of Israel and everything in it.

ALTHOUGH, Israel does allow Muslims both from Gaza and the "West Bank" to come to the Temple Mount during the month of Ramadan.
Something the Muslims do not return when it comes to allowing Jews visit their holy sites in Judea, Samaria, Jordan, etc.
Jews always have to do it at night and with the help of the IDF.

Look !!
The Muslims do not have to do it in the dead of night, and do not need any security. I wonder why that is ....

Last Year:
Israel opens door from Gaza to Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | The National

This year:
Palestinians pour into Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | Daily Mail Online

Tens of thousands of Palestinians poured into Jerusalem to attend the first Friday prayers of the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, Islam's third-holiest site, under heavy Israeli security.
------------------------------------

It is always important to point out that Jerusalem was never important on Ramadan or any other Muslim holiday until after the 1970s.

Could you tell you tell why?


Israel is the one who has them fenced in. Their mosque has been there longer than Solomon's temple which was most like the size of a small cabin , double hut size.


History Lesson:

First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE

Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE

Islam founded = 610 CE

First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)

-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?

Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?


"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?

The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.

There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."

BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon

Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?

The Arch of Titus, Rome

The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.

The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.

The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.

The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.

1662px-TitusbogenFront.jpg


1440px-Carrying_off_the_Menorah_from_the_Temple_in_Jerusalem_depicted_on_a_frieze_on_the_Arch_of_Titus_in_the_Forum_Romanum.JPG




That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.
 
How dense can you be? Very.

Why doesn't Muslim Egypt let Muslim Gazans get out of Gaza via their crossing and let them catch a ship or plane out of Gaza?
And for free?

Israel is under no obligation to allow foreiners who may want to come into Israel to blow up the people of Israel and everything in it.

ALTHOUGH, Israel does allow Muslims both from Gaza and the "West Bank" to come to the Temple Mount during the month of Ramadan.
Something the Muslims do not return when it comes to allowing Jews visit their holy sites in Judea, Samaria, Jordan, etc.
Jews always have to do it at night and with the help of the IDF.

Look !!
The Muslims do not have to do it in the dead of night, and do not need any security. I wonder why that is ....

Last Year:
Israel opens door from Gaza to Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | The National

This year:
Palestinians pour into Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | Daily Mail Online

Tens of thousands of Palestinians poured into Jerusalem to attend the first Friday prayers of the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, Islam's third-holiest site, under heavy Israeli security.
------------------------------------

It is always important to point out that Jerusalem was never important on Ramadan or any other Muslim holiday until after the 1970s.

Could you tell you tell why?


Israel is the one who has them fenced in. Their mosque has been there longer than Solomon's temple which was most like the size of a small cabin , double hut size.


History Lesson:

First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE

Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE

Islam founded = 610 CE

First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)

-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?

Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?


"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?

The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.

There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."

BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon

Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?

The Arch of Titus, Rome

The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.

The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.

The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.

The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.

1662px-TitusbogenFront.jpg


1440px-Carrying_off_the_Menorah_from_the_Temple_in_Jerusalem_depicted_on_a_frieze_on_the_Arch_of_Titus_in_the_Forum_Romanum.JPG




That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.


I have surely never read from Iranians or Italians that they were the owners of the Temples in the land of Israel.

Lots of things were built in the Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Byzantine, Crusade and Ottoman eras in the Land of Israel.

Do you have a list of these governments saying that anything built during those eras belongs to them, and they want to take ownership of them?

Will you answer my question as to who are the Jews you are afraid of? You said so yourself .

What does " I am afraid of who is a Jew" mean?
 
Whose temple is it anyway? It's OURS now ...

From_the_Album_The_Great_Victory_in_Pictures_1967.jpg
 
How dense can you be? Very.

Why doesn't Muslim Egypt let Muslim Gazans get out of Gaza via their crossing and let them catch a ship or plane out of Gaza?
And for free?

Israel is under no obligation to allow foreiners who may want to come into Israel to blow up the people of Israel and everything in it.

ALTHOUGH, Israel does allow Muslims both from Gaza and the "West Bank" to come to the Temple Mount during the month of Ramadan.
Something the Muslims do not return when it comes to allowing Jews visit their holy sites in Judea, Samaria, Jordan, etc.
Jews always have to do it at night and with the help of the IDF.

Look !!
The Muslims do not have to do it in the dead of night, and do not need any security. I wonder why that is ....

Last Year:
Israel opens door from Gaza to Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | The National

This year:
Palestinians pour into Jerusalem for Ramadan prayers | Daily Mail Online

Tens of thousands of Palestinians poured into Jerusalem to attend the first Friday prayers of the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, Islam's third-holiest site, under heavy Israeli security.
------------------------------------

It is always important to point out that Jerusalem was never important on Ramadan or any other Muslim holiday until after the 1970s.

Could you tell you tell why?


Israel is the one who has them fenced in. Their mosque has been there longer than Solomon's temple which was most like the size of a small cabin , double hut size.


History Lesson:

First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE

Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE

Islam founded = 610 CE

First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)

-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?

Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?


"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?

The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.

There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."

BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon

Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?

The Arch of Titus, Rome

The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.

The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.

The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.

The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.

1662px-TitusbogenFront.jpg


1440px-Carrying_off_the_Menorah_from_the_Temple_in_Jerusalem_depicted_on_a_frieze_on_the_Arch_of_Titus_in_the_Forum_Romanum.JPG




That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.


Could you clarify to me which Jewish groups were having a civil war with each other?

Are you telling us that there weren't three revolts against the Romans, and all of those wars were civil wars? Jews against Jews?
For what reason?
 
Israel is the one who has them fenced in. Their mosque has been there longer than Solomon's temple which was most like the size of a small cabin , double hut size.


History Lesson:

First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE

Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE

Islam founded = 610 CE

First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)

-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?

Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?


"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?

The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.

There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."

BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon

Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?

The Arch of Titus, Rome

The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.

The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.

The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.

The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.

1662px-TitusbogenFront.jpg


1440px-Carrying_off_the_Menorah_from_the_Temple_in_Jerusalem_depicted_on_a_frieze_on_the_Arch_of_Titus_in_the_Forum_Romanum.JPG




That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.


I have surely never read from Iranians or Italians that they were the owners of the Temples in the land of Israel.

Lots of things were built in the Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Byzantine, Crusade and Ottoman eras in the Land of Israel.

Do you have a list of these governments saying that anything built during those eras belongs to them, and they want to take ownership of them?

Will you answer my question as to who are the Jews you are afraid of? You said so yourself .

What does " I am afraid of who is a Jew" mean?


I am not afraid of jews.
 
Israel is the one who has them fenced in. Their mosque has been there longer than Solomon's temple which was most like the size of a small cabin , double hut size.


History Lesson:

First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE

Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE

Islam founded = 610 CE

First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)

-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?

Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?


"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?

The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.

There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."

BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon

Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?

The Arch of Titus, Rome

The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.

The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.

The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.

The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.

1662px-TitusbogenFront.jpg


1440px-Carrying_off_the_Menorah_from_the_Temple_in_Jerusalem_depicted_on_a_frieze_on_the_Arch_of_Titus_in_the_Forum_Romanum.JPG




That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.


Could you clarify to me which Jewish groups were having a civil war with each other?

Are you telling us that there weren't three revolts against the Romans, and all of those wars were civil wars? Jews against Jews?
For what reason?


I suggest you read some history, start with Josephus war of the jews. Read roman history. Yes Jews killed Jews and fought amongst themselves.
 
History Crash Course #31: Herod the Great

While Herod was a Edomite turned Jew, he was also pro Roman. His building projects which put men to work, came mainly from Rome and trade, since Judea was a huge trade route. As long as the Judeans and Israelites behaved and didn't rob the traders, Rome was fine with them and left them alone.
 
History Lesson:

First Solomon Temple: 10th Century BCE

Second Solomon Temple " = ca. 516 BCE

Islam founded = 610 CE

First Muslim Mosque = The Quba Mosque (or one of the firsts)
built during Mohammad's lifetime. (7th Century CE)

-------------------------
Now, which Mosque are you talking about, which is older than Solomon's First Temple?

Are you an atheist, or a Muslim intent in denying anything and everything about Jewish History, culture, etc, regardless of all the evidence which contradicts almost everything you post?


"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?

The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.

There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."

BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon

Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?

The Arch of Titus, Rome

The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.

The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.

The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.

The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.

1662px-TitusbogenFront.jpg


1440px-Carrying_off_the_Menorah_from_the_Temple_in_Jerusalem_depicted_on_a_frieze_on_the_Arch_of_Titus_in_the_Forum_Romanum.JPG




That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.


Could you clarify to me which Jewish groups were having a civil war with each other?

Are you telling us that there weren't three revolts against the Romans, and all of those wars were civil wars? Jews against Jews?
For what reason?


I suggest you read some history, start with Josephus war of the jews. Read roman history. Yes Jews killed Jews and fought amongst themselves.


I did not say that Jews did not fight Jews at some points, for one reason or another, during the Roman conquest.

You are not acknowledging the Three revolts against the Romans.

Herod restored the second temple, he did not build it from scratch.

The Romans lost that spoil a long time ago, and there hasn't been one Roman, or descendant, to this day who has come to claim anything built with "Roman Money" be it in the Land of Israel, or anywhere else the Romans had conquered.

The same goes for every one of the conquerors who came and went and built anything in the places they conquered.

It is not International Law that if you had once conquered a land, but not made a nation for yourself out of it, that everything built on it continues to belong to the descendants of those people.

Some Muslims are the only ones who think that way.
Some Muslims still consider Southern Spain, and Vienna, etc as theirs because "some" Muslims had once conquered the area.

The idea of Mosques existing before the Solomon Temples were built would be an Islamic idea.

To Islam Adam and Eve were Muslims, and so were all other beings.

Moses freed the Muslims out of Egypt.

All of the above are recent Muslim ideas in order to delegitimize the Jewish People/Nation.

The fact that some in the world, like you, believes and spreads these beliefs (and that is all they are) does not change the history of the world, or the History of the Jewish People on their ancient land.

PS, there were no "Israelites" at the time of the Romans.

Read Josephus's book. Read Jewish History books.

I am sure that you have heard these stories from others, from your family, from church (or wherever you go), or any group which is anti Israel and Jews.
But actually READ any of those books?

Your attempt to pass things which never happened as true does not work in the real world.

And Israel and the Jews will continue to strive in spite of all the fear and hatred you have learned to have towards them.

Am Israel Chai
 
History Crash Course #31: Herod the Great

While Herod was a Edomite turned Jew, he was also pro Roman. His building projects which put men to work, came mainly from Rome and trade, since Judea was a huge trade route. As long as the Judeans and Israelites behaved and didn't rob the traders, Rome was fine with them and left them alone.

Nowhere on Aish.com article you posted the link for, does it refer to Jews AND Israelites.

Read some Jewish History books, instead of simply repeating what you have heard from others who "fear" Jews, or books and sites where all they promote is "fear" of Jews.
 
"What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?

The only evidence is the Bible. There are no other records describing it, and to date there has been no archaeological evidence of the Temple at all. What's more, other archaeological sites associated with King Solomon - palaces, fortresses and walled cities that seemed to match places and cities from the Bible - are also now in doubt.

There is a growing sense among scholars that most of these archaeological sites are actually later than previously believed. Some now believe there may be little or no archaeological evidence of King Solomon's time at all, and doubt that he ruled the vast empire which is described in the Bible."

BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon

Here we go idiot. Does a 2000 year old archeological remain count?

The Arch of Titus, Rome

The Arch of Titus is a Roman Triumphal Arch which was erected by Domitian in c. 81 CE at the foot of the Palatine hill on the Via Sacra in the Forum Romanum, Rome. It commemorates the victories of his father Vespasian and brother Titus in the Jewish Warin Judaea (70-71 CE) when the great city of Jerusalem was sacked and the vast riches of its temple plundered. The arch is also a political and religious statement expressing the divinity of the late emperor Titus.

The Arch provides one of the few contemporary depictions of Temple period artifacts.

The seven-branched menorah and trumpets are clearly depicted. It became a symbol of the Jewish diaspora. In a later era, Pope Paul IV made it the place of a yearly oath of submission. Until the modern State of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews refused to walk under it due to a rabbinical prohibition.

The menorah depicted on the Arch served as the model for the menorah used on the emblem of the state of Israel.

1662px-TitusbogenFront.jpg


1440px-Carrying_off_the_Menorah_from_the_Temple_in_Jerusalem_depicted_on_a_frieze_on_the_Arch_of_Titus_in_the_Forum_Romanum.JPG




That put an end to the civil war in Judea/Israel. That temple was built with Romes money, the one before was built with Persian money, and that belongs to Rome, remember the spoils of war. Its all in your OT what to do with the spoils of war.


Could you clarify to me which Jewish groups were having a civil war with each other?

Are you telling us that there weren't three revolts against the Romans, and all of those wars were civil wars? Jews against Jews?
For what reason?


I suggest you read some history, start with Josephus war of the jews. Read roman history. Yes Jews killed Jews and fought amongst themselves.


I did not say that Jews did not fight Jews at some points, for one reason or another, during the Roman conquest.

You are not acknowledging the Three revolts against the Romans.

Herod restored the second temple, he did not build it from scratch.

The Romans lost that spoil a long time ago, and there hasn't been one Roman, or descendant, to this day who has come to claim anything built with "Roman Money" be it in the Land of Israel, or anywhere else the Romans had conquered.

The same goes for every one of the conquerors who came and went and built anything in the places they conquered.

It is not International Law that if you had once conquered a land, but not made a nation for yourself out of it, that everything built on it continues to belong to the descendants of those people.

Some Muslims are the only ones who think that way.
Some Muslims still consider Southern Spain, and Vienna, etc as theirs because "some" Muslims had once conquered the area.

The idea of Mosques existing before the Solomon Temples were built would be an Islamic idea.

To Islam Adam and Eve were Muslims, and so were all other beings.

Moses freed the Muslims out of Egypt.

All of the above are recent Muslim ideas in order to delegitimize the Jewish People/Nation.

The fact that some in the world, like you, believes and spreads these beliefs (and that is all they are) does not change the history of the world, or the History of the Jewish People on their ancient land.

PS, there were no "Israelites" at the time of the Romans.

Read Josephus's book. Read Jewish History books.

I am sure that you have heard these stories from others, from your family, from church (or wherever you go), or any group which is anti Israel and Jews.
But actually READ any of those books?

Your attempt to pass things which never happened as true does not work in the real world.

And Israel and the Jews will continue to strive in spite of all the fear and hatred you have learned to have towards them.

Am Israel Chai


No doubt they have weapons they buy from us and nukes and nuclear subs. Do you actually read. If so you would not ask me such dumb questions. Rome sacked Judea, get over it. No actually the RCC never talked about you jews, and no , no one I know talks about you jews, its just not a big subject for most Americans. See how unimportant you are.
 
History Crash Course #31: Herod the Great

While Herod was a Edomite turned Jew, he was also pro Roman. His building projects which put men to work, came mainly from Rome and trade, since Judea was a huge trade route. As long as the Judeans and Israelites behaved and didn't rob the traders, Rome was fine with them and left them alone.

Nowhere on Aish.com article you posted the link for, does it refer to Jews AND Israelites.

Read some Jewish History books, instead of simply repeating what you have heard from others who "fear" Jews, or books and sites where all they promote is "fear" of Jews.

I really do not prefer the jewish bias, but I have read the jewish encly and jewish virtual library which has a slant. Read the Minds of the Bible, wrote by a rabbi. Most of you are secular, and if orthodox they you are a lot like Muslims of SA, your cousins.
 
they buy from us and nukes and nuclear subs

Actually ... Israeli nuclear weapons were developed in Israel and they have no nuclear submarines. The IN has Dolphin-class diesel submarines. A nuclear submarines only real advantage is time on station, they can stay submerged on station for months at a time. However, in the tiny Mediterranean, the much more silent diesel is a better choice.
 
When are you jews going to realize you are not that important, and some of us are aware that you caused the US many wars and many war have been started because of you jews. We have a pres. who is more jewish than most jew, everyone in his life is a jew just about . NY was the new Judea, you even have a parade there. Some of us are not so ignorant we do not know this stuff. I also suspect Israel was involved in the planning of 911 so get us to go to war in Iraq.
 
they buy from us and nukes and nuclear subs

Actually ... Israeli nuclear weapons were developed in Israel and they have no nuclear submarines. The IN has Dolphin-class diesel submarines. A nuclear submarines only real advantage is time on station, they can stay submerged on station for months at a time. However, in the tiny Mediterranean, the much more silent diesel is a better choice.

Germany has delivered subs which they say can be fitted with nuclear warheads, and I would not doubt if you have one pointed at the US. That is why we are never firm with your genocidal activity.
 
History Crash Course #31: Herod the Great

While Herod was a Edomite turned Jew, he was also pro Roman. His building projects which put men to work, came mainly from Rome and trade, since Judea was a huge trade route. As long as the Judeans and Israelites behaved and didn't rob the traders, Rome was fine with them and left them alone.

Herod was an Edumite "turned Jew"

Herod

Herod grew up in Rome where he was given a full Roman education and formed friendships with children of the Caesar, establishing great connections that would serve him later. He had a magnetic personality and was a genius in many ways. However, he also exhibited signs of mental illness and schizophrenia. At his worst, he was a certified madman prone to extreme violence aimed against foe and friend.

--
Even though Herod was a certified madman and murderer he had moments of genuine concern about the welfare of the country and the desire to be loved. In the end, he wanted to be Jewish. He was just not willing to give up his grandiose dreams to do anything about it.

To further reinforce his claims to the throne, as well as the illusory claim that he was part of the Hasmonean Dynasty, Herod prevailed upon Hyrcanus to give him his granddaughter, Mariamne (Miriam), in marriage. It appears from Josephus and Roman historical accounts that Herod truly loved her. However, it was unrequited. She viewed herself as the victim of an arranged marriage.

Distraught, Mariamne attempted to commit suicide, but was unsuccessful. Herod then had her tried and executed. According to the Talmud (Baba Basra 3a), the last Hasmonean was a young princess, and upon hearing that Herod intended to marry her and make her queen she committed suicide. Herod preserved her body in honey so that he could claim that he wed the daughter of a royal house.

-----------
You meant a Jew wannabe, right?
 
Germany has delivered subs which they say can be fitted with nuclear warheads

A nuclear submarine is a submarine with a nuclear power plant ... not a submarine capable of carrying nuclear weapons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom