Spread the wealth - one boat, a few boats, or many boats?

[boedicca]

And even better! 10 million boats for One Penny a piece!

Nope. Next time use your head, not your emotions.

Using my head I've deduced that your idea is moronic.

Neither of you use your damn heads, neither of you have common sense, and neither of you understand capitalism.

We are just following your stupid economics to its logical conclusion, bub.

No, you're not, but you think you are and that's the problem

Scuze moi, but it's quite clear that you don't understand economics at all.

Let's just print money and give everyone One Million Dollars!

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Nope. Next time use your head, not your emotions.

Using my head I've deduced that your idea is moronic.

Neither of you use your damn heads, neither of you have common sense, and neither of you understand capitalism.

We are just following your stupid economics to its logical conclusion, bub.

No, you're not, but you think you are and that's the problem

Scuze moi, but it's quite clear that you don't understand economics at all.

Let's just print money and give everyone One Million Dollars!

I've said nothing of the kind you little idiot. Grow up.

 

[bripat9643]

If an infinite amount of monkeys work for an infinite amount of time in a shipyard, they can build an infinite amount of boats!

Free boats for EVERYONE, except for the monkeys as they are sentenced to building boats for eternity and will have no time for leisure pursuits.

Famous software development maxim:

If one woman can have a baby in nine months, then 9 women can have a baby in one month.​

It's the opposite, dumbass. Just because a woman can make a baby in nine months doesn't mean nine women can make one in a month. It means you can't hurry the development schedule just by hiring more coders. God you're a idiot.

I know that, dumbass. I'm ridiculing your idiotic theory that dividing up money to make more numerous but smaller purchases produces more growth. It does precisely the opposite.

 

[bripat9643]

A simple notion that so many still reject. Why is a million dollar boat not as good as ten $100,000 boats, and 100 $10,000 boats is even better, and 1,000 $1,000 boats is much, much better still. Now, why is that? It has to do with the economic activity created by such a thing.

And even better! 10 million boats for One Penny a piece!

Nope. Next time use your head, not your emotions.

Using my head I've deduced that your idea is moronic.

Neither of you use your damn heads, neither of you have common sense, and neither of you understand capitalism.

ROFL! I think you're experiencing a psychological phenomena called "transference."

 

[PaintMyHouse]

If an infinite amount of monkeys work for an infinite amount of time in a shipyard, they can build an infinite amount of boats!

Free boats for EVERYONE, except for the monkeys as they are sentenced to building boats for eternity and will have no time for leisure pursuits.

Famous software development maxim:

If one woman can have a baby in nine months, then 9 women can have a baby in one month.​

It's the opposite, dumbass. Just because a woman can make a baby in nine months doesn't mean nine women can make one in a month. It means you can't hurry the development schedule just by hiring more coders. God you're a idiot.

I know that, dumbass. I'm ridiculing your idiotic theory that dividing up money to make more numerous but smaller purchases produces more growth. It does precisely the opposite.

As usual, you are dead wrong. When the money stops flowing so does the economy. If I make widgets I want to sell a million of them, not 100.

 

[bripat9643]

If an infinite amount of monkeys work for an infinite amount of time in a shipyard, they can build an infinite amount of boats!

Free boats for EVERYONE, except for the monkeys as they are sentenced to building boats for eternity and will have no time for leisure pursuits.

Famous software development maxim:

If one woman can have a baby in nine months, then 9 women can have a baby in one month.​

It's the opposite, dumbass. Just because a woman can make a baby in nine months doesn't mean nine women can make one in a month. It means you can't hurry the development schedule just by hiring more coders. God you're a idiot.

I know that, dumbass. I'm ridiculing your idiotic theory that dividing up money to make more numerous but smaller purchases produces more growth. It does precisely the opposite.

As usual, you are dead wrong. When the money stops flowing so does the economy. If I make widgets I want to sell a million of them, not 100.

That has nothing to do with your theory. No one has claimed that selling 1,000,000 X is not as good as selling 100 X

 

[PaintMyHouse]

A simple notion that so many still reject. Why is a million dollar boat not as good as ten $100,000 boats, and 100 $10,000 boats is even better, and 1,000 $1,000 boats is much, much better still. Now, why is that? It has to do with the economic activity created by such a thing.

And even better! 10 million boats for One Penny a piece!

Nope. Next time use your head, not your emotions.

Using my head I've deduced that your idea is moronic.

Neither of you use your damn heads, neither of you have common sense, and neither of you understand capitalism.

ROFL! I think you're experiencing a psychological phenomena called "transference."

No my little man, that's projection. You have no clue how capitalism works, not even at this very simple level, which is why I made the OP in the first place.

 

[boedicca]

Using my head I've deduced that your idea is moronic.

Neither of you use your damn heads, neither of you have common sense, and neither of you understand capitalism.

We are just following your stupid economics to its logical conclusion, bub.

No, you're not, but you think you are and that's the problem

Scuze moi, but it's quite clear that you don't understand economics at all.

Let's just print money and give everyone One Million Dollars!

I've said nothing of the kind you little idiot. Grow up.

You sad sack of sophistry. Your "theory" (ahem, the theory that is yours, it is your theory) is that more cheap stuff is better for the economy than one expensive thing. Is there any demand for your cheapo boats? It sounds like a stupid Soviet 5 Year Plan Goal of making things for which there is not any real demand (i.e., giant railroad spikes instead of useful nails because a ton is a ton is a ton).

 

[PaintMyHouse]

If an infinite amount of monkeys work for an infinite amount of time in a shipyard, they can build an infinite amount of boats!

Free boats for EVERYONE, except for the monkeys as they are sentenced to building boats for eternity and will have no time for leisure pursuits.

Famous software development maxim:

If one woman can have a baby in nine months, then 9 women can have a baby in one month.​

It's the opposite, dumbass. Just because a woman can make a baby in nine months doesn't mean nine women can make one in a month. It means you can't hurry the development schedule just by hiring more coders. God you're a idiot.

I know that, dumbass. I'm ridiculing your idiotic theory that dividing up money to make more numerous but smaller purchases produces more growth. It does precisely the opposite.

As usual, you are dead wrong. When the money stops flowing so does the economy. If I make widgets I want to sell a million of them, not 100.

That has nothing to do with your theory. No one has claimed that selling 1,000,000 X is not as good as selling 100 X

You seem to be, moron. If you weren't then you'd understand why you want lots of people making and selling lots of things, all day long.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The symbol is fine but what we want are lots of boats creating lots of economic activity.

dear, please keep in mind that you're a liberal and so, very slow; in fact, an economic illiterate. A 1 million dollar boat does not create more activity than 10 100k boats. Its the same,and, we don't have a libNazi bureau to dictate at the point of a gun what the maximum size of everything ought to be. Its so idiotic there are no words for it.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Neither of you use your damn heads, neither of you have common sense, and neither of you understand capitalism.

We are just following your stupid economics to its logical conclusion, bub.

No, you're not, but you think you are and that's the problem

Scuze moi, but it's quite clear that you don't understand economics at all.

Let's just print money and give everyone One Million Dollars!

I've said nothing of the kind you little idiot. Grow up.

You sad sack of sophistry. Your "theory" (ahem, the theory that is yours, it is your theory) is that more cheap stuff is better for the economy than one expensive thing. Is there any demand for your cheapo boats? It sounds like a stupid Soviet 5 Year Plan Goal of making things for which there is not any real demand (i.e., giant railroad spikes instead of useful nails because a ton is a ton is a ton).

Many cheap boats mean that many people all the stuff that goes with a boat, not just a few.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

A 1 million dollar boat does not create more activity than 10 100k boats.

Lover, that's correct, it creates less economic activity and we need more, so we need more boats not fewer more expensive ones.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

A 1 million dollar boat does not create more activity than 10 100k boats.

Lover, that's correct, it creates less economic activity and we need more, so we need more boats not fewer more expensive ones.

too stupid illiterate and liberal! as long as money is not destroyed the same amount of money still exists in the economy and the economic activity is the same! Econ 101

 

[bripat9643]

Famous software development maxim:

If one woman can have a baby in nine months, then 9 women can have a baby in one month.​

It's the opposite, dumbass. Just because a woman can make a baby in nine months doesn't mean nine women can make one in a month. It means you can't hurry the development schedule just by hiring more coders. God you're a idiot.

I know that, dumbass. I'm ridiculing your idiotic theory that dividing up money to make more numerous but smaller purchases produces more growth. It does precisely the opposite.

As usual, you are dead wrong. When the money stops flowing so does the economy. If I make widgets I want to sell a million of them, not 100.

That has nothing to do with your theory. No one has claimed that selling 1,000,000 X is not as good as selling 100 X

You seem to be, moron. If you weren't then you'd understand why you want lots of people making and selling lots of things, all day long.

You're devolving into a kindergarten prophet.

 

[boedicca]

We are just following your stupid economics to its logical conclusion, bub.

No, you're not, but you think you are and that's the problem

Scuze moi, but it's quite clear that you don't understand economics at all.

Let's just print money and give everyone One Million Dollars!

I've said nothing of the kind you little idiot. Grow up.

You sad sack of sophistry. Your "theory" (ahem, the theory that is yours, it is your theory) is that more cheap stuff is better for the economy than one expensive thing. Is there any demand for your cheapo boats? It sounds like a stupid Soviet 5 Year Plan Goal of making things for which there is not any real demand (i.e., giant railroad spikes instead of useful nails because a ton is a ton is a ton).

Many cheap boats mean that many people all the stuff that goes with a boat, not just a few.

You're assuming people actually want and can afford the cheapo boats - or will this all be subsidized by government backed Subprime Loans?

 

[percysunshine]

A 1 million dollar boat does not create more activity than 10 100k boats.

Lover, that's correct, it creates less economic activity and we need more, so we need more boats not fewer more expensive ones.

This would be the 'Let's generate a lot of heat, but not much light' school of economics. It is the Chinese model. They do ok with it, but they have a billion people generating the same amount of light that 100 million Americans generate.

 

[bripat9643]

You help the poor man more by investing your money. That creates jobs. Spending only pours money down the sewer.

LOL. Another even funnier total bomb. Putting money in the bank mostly helps, the bank.

Really? So where do people get the money to buy a home?

You are a total nimrod.

Buying a home helps the bank quite a bit or they wouldn't loan you the money. It helps the economy even more, when you go and buy shit for the house. As long as people are buying, business, therefore the economy, is good.

So do your savings help anyone besides the bank?

Yes, they do, but they also help the bank and they don't help the economy as much as spending does.

Wrong, numskull, savings are what make the economy grow. Consumption makes the economy contract. Savings is like the seed corn the farmer puts aside to plant next years crop. No seed corn, no crop. If you want a bigger crop, then you have to more aside. Numskulls like you want to eat the seed corn. You theory of economics is a prescription for destitution and mass poverty.

 

[bripat9643]

And even better! 10 million boats for One Penny a piece!

Nope. Next time use your head, not your emotions.

Using my head I've deduced that your idea is moronic.

Neither of you use your damn heads, neither of you have common sense, and neither of you understand capitalism.

ROFL! I think you're experiencing a psychological phenomena called "transference."

No my little man, that's projection. You have no clue how capitalism works, not even at this very simple level, which is why I made the OP in the first place.

I'm literally rolling on floor after I ready your pretensions of having a superior understanding of economics. What you call "economics" is propaganda conceived by demagogues so they can loot boobs like you.

 

[bripat9643]

Famous software development maxim:

If one woman can have a baby in nine months, then 9 women can have a baby in one month.​

It's the opposite, dumbass. Just because a woman can make a baby in nine months doesn't mean nine women can make one in a month. It means you can't hurry the development schedule just by hiring more coders. God you're a idiot.

I know that, dumbass. I'm ridiculing your idiotic theory that dividing up money to make more numerous but smaller purchases produces more growth. It does precisely the opposite.

As usual, you are dead wrong. When the money stops flowing so does the economy. If I make widgets I want to sell a million of them, not 100.

That has nothing to do with your theory. No one has claimed that selling 1,000,000 X is not as good as selling 100 X

You seem to be, moron. If you weren't then you'd understand why you want lots of people making and selling lots of things, all day long.

What we want is people producing something of value. What you want is for them to produce stuff whether anyone wants it or not.

Furthermore $1,000,000 of economic activity is $1,000,000 of economic activity, no matter how you slice it up.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

A 1 million dollar boat does not create more activity than 10 100k boats.

Lover, that's correct, it creates less economic activity and we need more, so we need more boats not fewer more expensive ones.

too stupid illiterate and liberal! as long as money is not destroyed the same amount of money still exists in the economy and the economic activity is the same! Econ 101

Money you can not even begin to understand and all economic activity is not the same, which is Econ101 and something you have missed. Someone making 1 mil on a currency trade is not the same as someone spending 1 mil to open a Charter School.