i am agnostic, i pray to no gods for anything.
some folks need that [faith] to be ok. im not one of them.
i respect that for other people.
i do lean left for sure and i do not condone
someone being degraded on the air like that.
period.
she doesnt want 'free' birth control so she can
indiscriminately fuck her way around campus.
she wants it to be a part of her insurance. in
my opinion it should be covered, it is a huge part
of a womans health. nothing slut like about that
at all.
not sure what a mans health insurance includes but
things like viagra/vasectomies i would think are.
what is the difference?
I don't really think that any "for casual sex" contraception (or) anti-pregnancy paraphanilia (i.e. the morning after pill, or condoms etc. for example), should be covered by tax payers money by government mandate upon an insurance company requirement to cover, where as by order of such a mandate, is it being done now without the taxpayers input first or say so in such a case?
(IMHO) this is wrong, especially abortion on a whim, if used as some sort of contraception after the fact, otherwise all due to the irresponsible actions that were engaged in between two irresponsible people in their lives, and out of pure lust they came together, then they want an abortion to do away with their mistake, and they want us to pay for it ???? That's not right at all (IMHO)
Adoption would be the better choice always, where as to kill is never a good choice or ever the right choice, and I mean never,
UNLESS rape, molestation, or forced incest were the case, where as upon immediately after the rape or other situations that were listed, then a DNC would be quickly performed immediately afterwards, and this before the egg is fertilized, in order to stop a potential pregnancy before even created from such a traggic situation, where as it is only right (IMHO) to allow a person not to be forced to allow her egg to be fertilized by a rapist or worse.
Now procedures that people need to go through for various medical reasons or rather they may be getting to old now to have children, and just don't want to slip up, where as they need an implant or visectomy etc. in which will stop them from being able to become pregnant or get someone pregnant at all anymore in there life, I think is another thing altogether, and should be covered, in which I think always has been in many instances or cases.
Viagra also should not be covered....Nope I don't think so..... People should have to purchase this pill also on there own, hec the prices would come down big time, and this so they could purchase these things, if the government would stay out of it as much as possible... The government with to much involvement is the biggest problem I think....
