Special Counsel Asks Supreme Court To Rule Quickly Whether Trump Can Be Prosecuted

[Godboy]

We will just have to agree to disagree, I do not think anyone should be above the law. We have a president, not a king or a dictator

Then you believe that Obama should be in prison for murdering US civilians? How about for drone striking a wedding?

 

[Marener]

Trump isnt claiming that. For example, he isnt suggesting that he can kill a baby with a shotgun on live tv and be immune.

Presidents have murdered and tortured people in the past. Weve had president carpet bomb cities full of civilians. We had a president drop 2 nuclear weapons on civilian populations. What exactly do you think Trump did that crossed the line of presidential immunity?

Why don’t you attempt to describe what Trump is claiming then.

 

[Godboy]

Why don’t you attempt to describe what Trump is claiming then.

He is allowed to say whatever the **** he wants. If he thinks the elections are rigged, it is not only his right to say so, but also his duty as president. Being wrong isnt illegal. Hell, lying isnt illegal either.

 

[Marener]

He is allowed to say whatever the **** he wants. If he thinks the elections are rigged, it is not only his right to say so, but also his duty as president. Being wrong isnt illegal. Hell, lying isnt illegal either.

You have no clue what’s going on with these motions.

Please stop pretending you do.

 

[postman]

so you believe the POTUS should be above the law and that laws should not apply to them?

Presidential immunity would allow the president to stop paying taxes, and be immune from prosecution.

 

[Godboy]

You have no clue what’s going on with these motions.

Please stop pretending you do.

Um, im well aware of this case. None of his tweets violated the law, his speeches didnt violate the law, and his requests to investigate the election didnt violate the law.

Wanting to postpone the election results briefly so a court can hear your arguments is not illegal. You want to criminalize the contesting of an election, but it isnt going to work.

This case was never meant to be won. It was meant to hurt Trump in the polls, but it backfired.

 

[postman]

Yes, otherwise we have chaos. Do you want to see conservative DA's indicting Obama on murder, or how about eco terrorism charges for Joe Biden if we find out he ordered the attack on Nord Stream pipeline?

There isnt a president in existence that cant be tried for dozens of crimes if we take away their immunity.

What you confuse is those acts done as president, and those acts done outside of official presidential acts.

Such as the president can order the murder of Osama BinLaden. Which as an official act is covered . But if he orders the breakin of a political office in the Watergate Hotel, that's not an official act, and is not covered.

 

[Godboy]

What you confuse is those acts done as president, and those acts done outside of official presidential acts.

Such as the president can order the murder of Osama BinLaden. Which as an official act is covered . But if he orders the breakin of a political office in the Watergate Hotel, that's not an official act, and is not covered.

And what exactly are you suggesting that Trump did that isnt covered?

 

[postman]

He is allowed to say whatever the **** he wants. If he thinks the elections are rigged, it is not only his right to say so, but also his duty as president. Being wrong isnt illegal. Hell, lying isnt illegal either.

Do you think someone, especially with Trumps crazy followers, should be allowed to say that someone should shoot one of his disloyal cabinet members, or kill a federal judge?

And say it was protected 1st amendment speech.

 

[Marener]

Um, im well aware of this case. None of his tweets violated the law, his speeches didnt violate the law, and his requests to investigate the election didnt violate the law.

Wanting to postpone the election results briefly so a court can hear your arguments is not illegal. You want to criminalize the contesting of an election, but it isnt going to work.

This case was never meant to be won. It was meant to hurt Trump in the polls, but it backfired.

That has nothing to do with Trump’s attempt to have the case dismissed by claiming presidential immunity.

You have no idea what you’re talking about.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Then you believe that Obama should be in prison for murdering US civilians? How about for drone striking a wedding?

I would have no problem with someone brining up that charge and letting a court decide.

 

[Godboy]

That has nothing to do with Trump’s attempt to have the case dismissed by claiming presidential immunity.

You have no idea what you’re talking about.

Then what do YOU think Trump's case is?

 

[Moonglow]

Yeah, pretty interesting. This gets it over with, one way or the other, and would take away his main argument.

This court? Who knows what they'll say, or what they'll do.

It is speculative to suggest that the president can commit crimes and be immune, of course, there are those acts of war they can never be prosecuted for.

 

[Moonglow]

Then what do YOU think Trump's case is?

A case of Constitutional review.

 

[Godboy]

I would have no problem with someone brining up that charge and letting a court decide.

Dude, every single president would come out of the office under numerous indictments. What do you suppose that would do to future presidents? Are they all going to be awesome after that? No!!! They will all be paralyzed with fear and bad guys around the world will greatly prosper as a result.

 

[Godboy]

A case of Constitutional review.

Tha **** kind of answer is that?

 

[postman]

Wanting to postpone the election results briefly so a court can hear your arguments is not illegal.

It's in violation of the US Constitution and the laws of the United States.

The Constitution clearly says that the results can't be delayed for any reason, and if there are any delays, it triggers the process whereby the decision goes to congress to declare a result within that same timeframe.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Yes, otherwise we have chaos. Do you want to see conservative DA's indicting Obama on murder, or how about eco terrorism charges for Joe Biden if we find out he ordered the attack on Nord Stream pipeline?

There isnt a president in existence that cant be tried for dozens of crimes if we take away their immunity.

Ridiculous, ignorant, hyperbolic nonsense.

No grand jury would indict President Obama for murder because there would be no evidence of a crime; Federal prosecutors can’t indict someone absent evidence just because they want to.

Trump was indicted because there was ample, compelling, objective, documented evidence of his crimes.

No one is above the law, including presidents.

 

[postman]

And what exactly are you suggesting that Trump did that isnt covered?

Incite an attack on the US Capitol.

 

[Godboy]

It's in violation of the US Constitution and the laws of the United States.

Absolutely not. You can dely electoral results under a court order. Any suggestion otherwise is pure horseshit.