You'll have to be a bit more specific on which or what house?
If you're referring to Obama, that was more a concerted effort to destroy his presidency when there was no evidence he did anything..period.
We have lots of evidence with Trump.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi Led Failed Treasonous Congressional Democrat Coup Attempt
- Thread starter easyt65
- Start date
If you're referring to Obama, that was more a concerted effort to destroy his presidency when there was no evidence he did anything..period.
We have lots of evidence with Trump.
- Sep 28, 2010
- 55,959
- 16,203
- 2,180
Why, because the fact that his years long investigation didn't result in any serious charges or live up to the much touted Neo-GOP expectations of uncovering Obamagate?You must think Durham is an unserious person?
He is compromised by his association with Trumpy "the grifter".
He looks serious.
Hmmm….all that “evidence “, yet nothing to date to show for it? Either you guys are incompetent, or it’s all bull shit…or both.You'll have to be a bit more specific on which or what house?
If you're referring to Obama, that was more a concerted effort to destroy his presidency when there was no evidence he did anything..period.
We have lots of evidence with Trump.
So, it’s only if you accept his conclusions, is that it?Why, because the fact that his years long investigation didn't result in any serious charges or live up to the much touted Neo-GOP expectations of uncovering Obamagate?
He is compromised by his association with Trumpy "the grifter".
He looks serious.
- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,393
- 51,748
- 3,600
Why charge people who you know will never be indicted or held accountable?Why, because the fact that his years long investigation didn't result in any serious charges or live up to the much touted Neo-GOP expectations of uncovering Obamagate?
He is compromised by his association with Trumpy "the grifter".
He looks serious.
Nothing. Zip. Nada. 8 years for Obama. No indictments. No convictions. No jail sentences. Just bile and conspiracy theory from his opponents. Durham found nothing. Comer and Jordan have found nothing.Hmmm….all that “evidence “, yet nothing to date to show for it? Either you guys are incompetent, or it’s all bull shit…or both.
Do you guys ever get tired of losing? One would think you would just move on. But no. You cling to this man like a life preserver.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 32,297
- 20,974
- 1,845
Nothing. Zip. Nada. 8 years for Obama. No indictments. No convictions. No jail sentences. Just bile and conspiracy theory from his opponents. Durham found nothing. Comer and Jordan have found nothing.
Do you guys ever get tired of losing? One would think you would just move on. But no. You cling to this man like a life preserver.
Democrats are not subject to penalties for breaking US law.
Halfbreed residents all the more so.
You fucks would burn down the entire Country rather than see that fuck ever be held accountable.
I don't think that history will be kind to the half black Prrsident.
Full of shit as usual seeing how you are throwing your support behind a man whose wrongdoings are obvious. The fact that you'll overlook and excuse that shows you have no credibility whatsoever.Democrats are not subject to penalties for breaking US law.
Halfbreed residents all the more so.
You fucks would burn down the entire Country rather than see that fuck ever be held accountable.
I don't think that history will be kind to the half black Prrsident.
I get you didn't like a black man sitting in the White House, but jeez, 8 years and not even a hint of corruption..save for all the conspiracy theory mongering which appears to have gotten you nowhere.
Now, I call that a wasted effort.
- Sep 28, 2010
- 55,959
- 16,203
- 2,180
Because you don't have enough evidence to convince a jury is the leading cause.Why charge people who you know will never be indicted or held accountable?
- Sep 28, 2010
- 55,959
- 16,203
- 2,180
No it's not.So, it’s only if you accept his conclusions, is that it?
- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,393
- 51,748
- 3,600
Durham was a part of the cover up. We know that now.Because you don't have enough evidence to convince a jury is the leading cause.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 32,297
- 20,974
- 1,845
Full of shit as usual seeing how you are throwing your support behind a man whose wrongdoings are obvious. The fact that you'll overlook and excuse that shows you have no credibility whatsoever.
I get you didn't like a black man sitting in the White House, but jeez, 8 years and not even a hint of corruption..save for all the conspiracy theory mongering which appears to have gotten you nowhere.
Now, I call that a wasted effort.
Not a smidgen
As far as the brainwashed blind cult can see.
- Sep 28, 2010
- 55,959
- 16,203
- 2,180
Hahahaha, yes of course he was......so was Barr, and everyone else who's left that Trumpybear train.Durham was a part of the cover up. We know that now.
- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,393
- 51,748
- 3,600
Hahahaha, yes of course he was......so was Barr, and everyone else who's left that Trumpybear train.
Who? No one believes a word that comes out of Tuck's mouth.
- Sep 28, 2010
- 55,959
- 16,203
- 2,180
Who? Oh you mean that has been liar that was fired from "Faux Not News"
What kind of huge liar do you have to be to get fired from the liars network.
- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,393
- 51,748
- 3,600
He is not the liar. You are.Who? Oh you mean that has been liar that was fired from "Faux Not News"
What kind of huge liar do you have to be to get fired from the liars network.
- Sep 28, 2010
- 55,959
- 16,203
- 2,180
I didn't get fired for being a liar like Tuck did.He is not the liar. You are.
- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,393
- 51,748
- 3,600
No one ever proved he was lying and they won't until Dominion releases their source codes. Something they could have done and none of this would have went on. Why didn't they?I didn't get fired for being a liar like Tuck did.
- Sep 28, 2010
- 55,959
- 16,203
- 2,180
Who needs to prove what the fucker admits too?No one ever proved he was lying and they won't until Dominion releases their source codes. Something they could have done and none of this would have went on. Why didn't they?
The Fox News presenter himself is an admitted liar, telling right-wing media personality Dave Rubin that he will sometimes lie on air “if I’m really cornered or something”.
“I lie. I really try not to. I try never to lie on TV. I just don’t – I don’t like lying. I certainly do it, you know, out of weakness or whatever,” he said in 2021.
Carlson then claimed that his cable network rivals deliberately lie to viewers to protect a “system”.
“So if these people ask themselves, ‘why am I doing this?’ And they say, ‘well, I want to protect the system because I really believe in the system.’ OK, who’s running the system? You’re lying to defend Jeff Bezos? Like, you’re treating Bill Gates like some sort of moral leader, like, are you kidding me? How dare you do that,” he said.
Tucker Carlson defends George Santos in sarcastic attack on the press
Right-wing media personality suggests journalists have rocketed congressman from obscurity into ‘9/11 in human form’
www.independent.co.uk
Similar threads
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 106
- Replies
- 35
- Views
- 272
- Replies
- 30
- Views
- 339
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 27
- Replies
- 49
- Views
- 282
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8051
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-