South Dakota Lawmaker Says Businesses Should Be Allowed To Ban Colored People

[Preacher]

He's right. If you put the money,time,work into starting a business you should be allowed to serve or not serve whoever the hell you want,the capitalist system will handle the rest.

What was taking the capitalist system so long in the 60's that we had to pass a Civil Rights Act?

Why didn't that capitalist system prevent discrimination to begin with?

How long should those oppressed back then should have waited for their full protection under the law?

Like I said, for the most parts -- only white people opine about how it would have been better to let free markets handle institutionalized racism.

Well lets talk about what some blacks did during the worst of the worst of Jim Crow era laws -- they created their own businesses, colleges, hospitals, airports, etc -- they had very rich business districts all across the country -- one of those areas was dubbed Black Wallstreet in Tulsa Oklahoma -- Capitalism still didn't prevent that area from being raided and burned to the ground by the Jim Crow machine tho.

Because its NONE of the governments business! People enjoy being able to go to a store without ghetto trash invading it. They enjoy safe nice neighborhoods without the government FORCING diversity down our throats. Keep pushing people far enough and they are going to strike back mercilessly

 

[BrokeLoser]

So a sitting South Dakota lawmaker recently voiced his belief that businesses should be able to discriminate against people of color. Obviously this guy saw the recent Supreme Court ruling as a green light to go full racist -- and more and more openly racist/bigoted people are feeling more embolden to run for office (mainly as Republicans).

so my question is -- How many people here wish the Civil Rights bill was never passed?

Because essentially, to try to argue that businesses should be allowed to discriminate on the basis of race is saying you are against the Civil Rights Act.

From the article:
In an interview with the Leader, Clark said he believed that business owners should be able to turn away certain customers if they would otherwise violate their religious beliefs.

"If it’s truly his strongly based belief, he should be able to turn them away," Clark told the Leader. "People shouldn’t be able to use their minority status to bully a business."


It's stunning to me that an elected state lawmaker- no matter what the state - can be so ignorant as to not know what the Civil Rights Act is and does.

It’s awfully strange that LefTards struggle to understand such elementary principles.
I have found that teaching LefTards through story, the same way we teach five year olds is the most effective method.
Here goes-
Once upon a time in the Mexifornia Valley there was a porn studio that desperately needed a videographer to shoot their butt sex “movies”. The producers were frantic, they had to find a videographer immediately. There was a videographer whom ran a shop next door to the porn studio but he was a man of faith, a religious man and he only shot video for spiritual causes.
Desperate as all hell and immoral as **** the filthy LefTard producers walked into the mans shop and demanded the right to hire him to shoot their butt sex films and all the other filthy LefTards agreed that the man of faith should be forced by government to shoot those butt sex films.

THE END

 

[Wyatt earp]

So a sitting South Dakota lawmaker recently voiced his belief that businesses should be able to discriminate against people of color. Obviously this guy saw the recent Supreme Court ruling as a green light to go full racist -- and more and more openly racist/bigoted people are feeling more embolden to run for office (mainly as Republicans).

so my question is -- How many people here wish the Civil Rights bill was never passed?

Because essentially, to try to argue that businesses should be allowed to discriminate on the basis of race is saying you are against the Civil Rights Act.

From the article:
In an interview with the Leader, Clark said he believed that business owners should be able to turn away certain customers if they would otherwise violate their religious beliefs.

"If it’s truly his strongly based belief, he should be able to turn them away," Clark told the Leader. "People shouldn’t be able to use their minority status to bully a business."


It's stunning to me that an elected state lawmaker- no matter what the state - can be so ignorant as to not know what the Civil Rights Act is and does.

I'm not surprised. It don't find it stunning at all.

I see it as typical for conservatives.

What I am is horrified that the man was elected. He will probably be reelected too.

Hate is rampant now in America. The floodgates were opened with trump and now even more with that supreme court ruling.

Discrimination to any group of people is wrong and unconstitutional.

Our supreme court ruled decades ago that if you go into business with the public then you do business with all of the public. I agree with that ruling. Everyone pays taxes. Everyone contributed to the infrastructure that the business people rely on to make money. So everyone should be included.

Things are getting very bad here in America for everyone who isn't white, male, conservative, christian and heterosexual.

We are no longer the United States of America.

We are no longer the United States of America.


Good when is California leaving?

 

[Hellbilly]

I think they should. I also think black people should be able to ban white people. Its their ******* property. They should be able to ban anyone for anything.

People like you are the reason racism will never end.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

I believe in liberty and freedom over peoples feelings.

You believe in liberty and freedom...for white men.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

Of course i dont. Why would you say that?

I've read some of your posts.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

 

[TNHarley]

I think they should. I also think black people should be able to ban white people. Its their ******* property. They should be able to ban anyone for anything.

People like you are the reason racism will never end.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

I believe in liberty and freedom over peoples feelings.

You believe in liberty and freedom...for white men.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

Of course i dont. Why would you say that?

I've read some of your posts.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

Lol you will have to do better than that.

 

[JWBooth]

I think they should. I also think black people should be able to ban white people. Its their ******* property. They should be able to ban anyone for anything.

Agreed, it is economic suicide but it is their fool mistake to make.

 

[Hellbilly]

People like you are the reason racism will never end.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

I believe in liberty and freedom over peoples feelings.

You believe in liberty and freedom...for white men.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

Of course i dont. Why would you say that?

I've read some of your posts.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

Lol you will have to do better than that.

That's where you're wrong. I really don't need to prove to you what you already know.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

 

[TNHarley]

I believe in liberty and freedom over peoples feelings.

You believe in liberty and freedom...for white men.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

Of course i dont. Why would you say that?

I've read some of your posts.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

Lol you will have to do better than that.

That's where you're wrong. I really don't need to prove to you what you already know.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

Give it a rest

 

[deanrd]

Republicans say why won't colored people believe us when we say we aren't racist?

 

[buckeye45_73]

LOL, dude you guys are full of racists. And you democrats are experts at not only allowing a business to refuse service, you guys MAKE them refuse service

What business refused you service?

What "leftist" policy is making businesses refuse service to you?

I'll wait while you don't answer the question...

You guys implemented Jim Crow

Wait. Are you trying to tell us these people attacking the civil rights activists in this photo are liberals? BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Oh, man. Priceless.

Definitely democrats.....and democrats have been progressive since atleast Woodrow Wilson....you tell me.

 

[buckeye45_73]

You guys implemented Jim Crow

Please try to say with a straight face that these are leftists in the photo below.

Man, anyone who claims leftists were responsible for Jim Crow needs some serious cult deprogramming. Not kidding.

Not conservative republicans.....sorry man.....you are such a liar.

 

[buckeye45_73]

You guys implemented Jim Crow

You are a real hoot. You can't possibly be so stupid as to believe these are leftist cops enforcing Jim Crow.

Who fucked up your head like that? Please stop being their useful idiot.

Those aren't republicans...I've already kicked you ass on this topic
again when was the last democrat running for president more conservative than the republican......you cant name one.

 

[buckeye45_73]

You hear Trump talk about "law and order" a lot. It's a throwaway line he uses to get cheers and applause.

So here's why that kind of talk is considered a dog whistle by the left. There's a difference between "law and order" and "justice".

Take a look at the photo below.

See the guy swinging the billy club? He wants law and order.

See the guy being clubbed? He wants justice.

more democrats

 

[Flash]

The 1964 Civil Rights sucked.

We don't have liberty when the ******* government tells you who you have to hire, fire and do business with.

One of the most despicable laws ever passed.

 

[buckeye45_73]

They're most likely Democrats, bub.

But they are not leftists, are they.

So that makes them...what?

Go ahead. Be brave and say it.

Hint: The opposite of leftists.

Not so sorry to disappoint, bub. You are using the words liberal and conservative out of context with the definitions of that era.

Nope. It is you useful idiots who are using "Democrat" out of context. You have been deliberately trained to do so for this very reason.

Liberals were all about civil rights back then, just as they are today. Conservatives were reactionary and opposed to civil rights.

Those Democrats who blocked civil rights legislation were conservatives. They called themselves conservatives and right wingers. You have been kept ignorant of these facts. Deliberately so.


Your total ignorance of our history is being exploited by the propagandists who control your every thought.

Again, you are not using the proper definitions and context. But I already explained that; it's not my responsibility to compensate for your lack of comprehension.

No. You are trying to claim those bigots in all those photos were considered liberals in their day.

That is complete and utter horseshit, and you know it.

You do not have the integrity to admit it, but deep down inside you know the truth.

No it's not, those people voted for FDR, Adalii Stephenson, and JFK......they are NOT republicans nor conservatives......you really have no clue about politics......zero

here is a video that shuts down your lies

 

[buckeye45_73]

I believe in liberty and freedom over peoples feelings.

You believe in liberty and freedom...for white men.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

Of course i dont. Why would you say that?

I've read some of your posts.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

Lol you will have to do better than that.

That's where you're wrong. I really don't need to prove to you what you already know.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

when you make a statement like that, you better have proof

show us a post he made that said only for white men

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Wait. Are you trying to tell us these people attacking the civil rights activists in this photo are liberals? BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Oh, man. Priceless.

Definitely democrats.....and democrats have been progressive since at least Woodrow Wilson....you tell me.

Progressive in terms of economic policies -- arguing for a stronger central government and fighting for anti-trust legislation and labor rights -- but as far as Civil Rights -- neither party cared too much about changing that until much later -- and yes, it was the progressives who pushed that.

All I ask one of you conservatives to do is just find me one prominent conservative politician during that time who was outspoken against Jim Crow laws

 

[ChrisL]

I think the best way to marginalize these cockroaches is to shine a light on them. It ain't pretty, it ain't easy, but it's better than letting them fester. It's partially what gave us TRUMP.
.

What gave us Trump should inform you that we could easily return to the days of Whites Only lunch counters, and that such businesses would thrive again.

Most businesses care about only their bottom line and would not want such bad publicity anyways. Very few businesses (and no large businesses with shareholders) are going to be discriminating against anyone. That would be bad for business in today's day and age.

That doesn't excuse or negate the fact that a small amount of businesses would if they could.

Those are more likely to be in rural areas where there's no other business for the discriminated person to go to.

What are they supposed to do?

This is the year 2018. To say they wouldn't have any other place to shop at even in a rural area is pretty naive.

I guess you've never been to parts of Nevada, Arizona, California, Washington, Utah, Montana, Oregon and many other places in this nation.

My aunt lived in tiny town In Michigan that is just a lake with houses around it. One store which also had the gas station and a post office. That's it.

With nothing else for miles.

I've been to place on the island of Maui that is absolutely nothing for miles on end with only one place to get food and water along the way. If they're closed, you're out of luck. If you don't have gas, you're out of luck.

I guess you don't do much traveling around our nation do you?

Order a wedding cake online. Lol. Besides that, it's not as if people go get their wedding cake on the DAY of their wedding. That is planned months in advance!

Where do some of you people live where you have no internet access and you go order cakes on the same day as your damn wedding??

 

[ChrisL]

order a wedding cake online - Yahoo Search Results

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

No it's not, those people voted for FDR, Adalii Stephenson, and JFK......they are NOT republicans nor conservatives......you really have no clue about politics......zero

here is a video that shuts down your lies

Why did the chairman of the GOP apologize for using the southern strategy?

Did he just make it up?