Something for 9/11 Conspiracy loonies to read.

Last edited:
why did it take 40n Years for the truth of the bay of tonkin

Because there was a real incident on Aug 2nd. The August 4th incident was quite possibly an error based on ghost radar images, but in any case there was no real attack.

There was no plan or conspiracy here, just use of something that was (falsely) reported as a pretext. Similar to the sinking of the Maine, which was most likely an accident and not a Spanish attack, but was used as pretext for war.

In both cases, there was no conspiracy or US acts, but only cover ups of what really happened spun to be attacks so to further political agendas.

Completley different scale of number of people involved and effort of concealment.
 
why did it take 40n Years for the truth of the bay of tonkin

Because there was a real incident on Aug 2nd. The August 4th incident was quite possibly an error based on ghost radar images, but in any case there was no real attack.

There was no plan or conspiracy here, just use of something that was (falsely) reported as a pretext. Similar to the sinking of the Maine, which was most likely an accident and not a Spanish attack, but was used as pretext for war.

In both cases, there was no conspiracy or US acts, but only cover ups of what really happened spun to be attacks so to further political agendas.

Completley different scale of number of people involved and effort of concealment.

what a bunch of incoherent double speak
 
why did it take 40n Years for the truth of the bay of tonkin

Because there was a real incident on Aug 2nd. The August 4th incident was quite possibly an error based on ghost radar images, but in any case there was no real attack.

There was no plan or conspiracy here, just use of something that was (falsely) reported as a pretext. Similar to the sinking of the Maine, which was most likely an accident and not a Spanish attack, but was used as pretext for war.

In both cases, there was no conspiracy or US acts, but only cover ups of what really happened spun to be attacks so to further political agendas.

Completley different scale of number of people involved and effort of concealment.

what a bunch of incoherent double speak

What double speak, sounds about right to me. On the first date there was a battle. One shell hit a US Navy ship 3 or 4 NV boats were damaged and I believe half a dozen NV were killed, also I think one US plane was damaged.

The second date could have been nothing more than false radar readings.

pretty much what happened..............
 
why did it take 40n Years for the truth of the bay of tonkin

Because there was a real incident on Aug 2nd. The August 4th incident was quite possibly an error based on ghost radar images, but in any case there was no real attack.

There was no plan or conspiracy here, just use of something that was (falsely) reported as a pretext. Similar to the sinking of the Maine, which was most likely an accident and not a Spanish attack, but was used as pretext for war.

In both cases, there was no conspiracy or US acts, but only cover ups of what really happened spun to be attacks so to further political agendas.

Completley different scale of number of people involved and effort of concealment.

what a bunch of incoherent double speak
how did I know you'd say that.:eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle:
 

Forum List

Back
Top