Someone wants to use the 14th Amendment to fix the 2024 election for Dems.

[Marener]

And you are excusing anything that got you the result you wanted.

And you will encourage and support trying it again.

The case in Connecticut shows its possible. Once that is shown, any denials lose the certainty you pretend to claim.

I’ve not made any excuses. You’re making excuses for why Trump couldn’t sue before the election. He can and did. Your excuses don't hold water. They’re not accurate.

You asked for a court mandated coup by throwing out millions of votes from legitimate voters because they didn’t vote for Trump.

That’s a coup. How is it not?

 

[Faun]

Bullshit. The system won't override the system.

The bullshit is yours as there's already a case that was adjudicated which resulted in ad hoc changes to election rules being reversed.

 

[Faun]

Whoever extended mail voting without changing the law first, and whoever cheated.

Which would be both parties.

 

[Faun]

Ignored and dismissed, not settled.

Having the courts ignore any evidence of fraud or shenanigans is the coup.

There was no evidence of fraud brought into court.

 

[martybegan]

I’ve not made any excuses. You’re making excuses for why Trump couldn’t sue before the election. He can and did. Your excuses don't hold water. They’re not accurate.

You asked for a court mandated coup by throwing out millions of votes from legitimate voters because they didn’t vote for Trump.

That’s a coup. How is it not?

The suits were turned away for standing, regardless of source.

Coup Coup Coup, Coup Coup Coup.

That's all you sound like.

 

[martybegan]

The bullshit is yours as there's already a case that was adjudicated which resulted in ad hoc changes to election rules being reversed.

So was OJ's murder case. So was Dred Scott and Plessey. All adjudicated.

 

[martybegan]

Which would be both parties.

Then the Republicans who allowed it are idiots.

 

[martybegan]

There was no evidence of fraud brought into court.

There was evidence, it was just ignored and rejected.

The Connecticut case shows it's possible.

 

[Marener]

The suits were turned away for standing, regardless of source.

Coup Coup Coup, Coup Coup Coup.

That's all you sound like.

You don’t know what you’re talking about. Some suits were turned away but not all. The ones that were dismissed on standing weren’t dismissed for the reasons you say.

Your excuses are excuses because they’re based on lies.

You literally wanted to change the rules of the election AFTER the election so Trump could win. How is that not a coup?

 

[Marener]

There was evidence, it was just ignored and rejected.

Cite the court case and what evidence was offered.

Back it up, or run away like a little bitch. We both know which you’ll choose.

 

[martybegan]

You don’t know what you’re talking about. Some suits were turned away but not all. The ones that were dismissed on standing weren’t dismissed for the reasons you say.

Your excuses are excuses because they’re based on lies.

You literally wanted to change the rules of the election AFTER the election so Trump could win. How is that not a coup?

The same thing over and over. They changed the rules before the election, hid fraud during the election, then denied standing and anything else after the election.

You got what you wanted, and now you defend it because you have no scruples.

 

[martybegan]

Cite the court case and what evidence was offered.

Back it up, or run away like a little bitch. We both know which you’ll choose.

Kari Lake insists her failed lawsuit "proves" election fraud

 

[martybegan]

Cite the court case and what evidence was offered.

Back it up, or run away like a little bitch. We both know which you’ll choose.

Judge dismisses Georgia lawsuit alleging fraud in 2020 election

More standing denial.

 

[Marener]

Kari Lake insists her failed lawsuit "proves" election fraud

Yet again, that lawsuit didn’t allege fraud. It made complaints about the process, but not fraud.

The court absolutely listened to the “evidence” presented which was mostly just feelings and baseless accusations.

So you look like a moron for taking Kari Lake at her word and also because the court case disproves the point you’re trying to make.

 

[Faun]

So was OJ's murder case. So was Dred Scott and Plessey. All adjudicated.

Not sure what your point is? None of that has anything to do with the fact that a case went to court over ad hoc changes to their election laws and the court sided with the plaintiff, concluding the changes were illegal and had to be reversed. Something you claimed can't happen.

Oh, and OJ's case resulted in the right verdict.

 

[Faun]

Then the Republicans who allowed it are idiots.

In some cases, they didn't just allow it -- they implemented it. Then cried after the election the changes should not have been allowec.

 

[kaz]

Yet again, that lawsuit didn’t allege fraud. It made complaints about the process, but not fraud.

The court absolutely listened to the “evidence” presented which was mostly just feelings and baseless accusations.

So you look like a moron for taking Kari Lake at her word and also because the court case disproves the point you’re trying to make.

If the parties were reversed, you'd be having an aneurism the Democrat fraud was so obvious, Bevis

 

[Marener]

Judge dismisses Georgia lawsuit alleging fraud in 2020 election

More standing denial.

Case was appealed and reversed based on standing.

GARLAND FAVORITO et al v. ALEX WAN et al

GARLAND FAVORITO et al v. ALEX WAN et al

law.justia.com

 

[Faun]

There was evidence, it was just ignored and rejected.

The Connecticut case shows it's possible.

Which case was that and what was their evidence?

 

[Marener]

If the parties were reversed, you'd be having an aneurism the Democrat fraud was so obvious, Bevis

Red states often have problems at polling places in democratic areas. People are used to standing in line sometimes for hours. It’s routine.

The problems for Kari Lake’s voters were half overblown and half avoidable if they had just submitted their ballot for counting at a later time. Entitled conservatives are going to act entitled, though.

At no point did anyone show the problems were intentional or any attempt to sway the election, which is what the lunatics like Kari Lake were trying to allege.