Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
Suicides among active enlisted highest in the Air Force.
Snowflakes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Suicides among active enlisted highest in the Air Force.
Nuke......Why would you need nukes to take out an airbase...…..wtfRiiighhhttttt…..….. funny how many has US pulled off, no warning ……At the first sign of war which will be airbases burning. It's a non policy policy.
I think it's time to hear from the guys that actually practiced the mobility or bugout of the bases.
There is no "First Strike at a Minutes Notice" going to happen by anyone. it's going to take time to reprogram the missiles (target them), assemble forces, etc.. Think of days, not hours or minutes. While you are doing this, the other side isn't sitting idly by. They have people watching us and we have people watching them. As they progress closer to actually launching, before that, we have already loaded up our nukes, reprogrammed out missiles and warheads and started getting ready for the mobility. The closer it gets, the more the bugout gets to starting. At the last minute, the prepositioned pallets and personnel are loaded up and the move starts. This is done before the bombers and tankers launch. When they launch, a certain number of key personnel will bug out and literally move to another location for recovery or sustainability purposes. The Joke was the new home would be some corn field in Kansas. Of course, it would be in a real corn field. Chances are, it might be a civilian air strip somewhere else. The other side can't hit ALL the available air fields. That is going to be your new home. The base you left will probably be cinders. But you can recover and possibly relaunch Tankers and Bombers if need be. You will also have fully function Medical Facilities, security, etc.. It makes sure that the Military will still exist after the initial blasts. It also means that the Civilians will be able to rely on the Military for a lot of things to help keep their lives from going to crap. And the US Government will continue regardless.
You may not think this is important but it's damned important "The Day After".
You really have no idea just how hard it is to start a full blown Nuclear Exchange. It's designed today so that there can be no sneak attacks by either side. We have monitors and they have monitors. And then there are the spies up the ying yang by both sides. The Generals can't take a crap without the other side knowing how many squares he used of toilet paper. You have been watching way too many movies.
And just how are you going to take out major Air Force Operational Bases? And how are you going to take out the stateside bases with the fighters, bombers and supplies to resupply lost inventory as a war goes on in Europe? There is only one sure fired way. You drop a nice nuke package and it's done.
Nucleophobia detected.Nuke......Why would you need nukes to take out an airbase...…..wtfRiiighhhttttt…..….. funny how many has US pulled off, no warning ……I think it's time to hear from the guys that actually practiced the mobility or bugout of the bases.
There is no "First Strike at a Minutes Notice" going to happen by anyone. it's going to take time to reprogram the missiles (target them), assemble forces, etc.. Think of days, not hours or minutes. While you are doing this, the other side isn't sitting idly by. They have people watching us and we have people watching them. As they progress closer to actually launching, before that, we have already loaded up our nukes, reprogrammed out missiles and warheads and started getting ready for the mobility. The closer it gets, the more the bugout gets to starting. At the last minute, the prepositioned pallets and personnel are loaded up and the move starts. This is done before the bombers and tankers launch. When they launch, a certain number of key personnel will bug out and literally move to another location for recovery or sustainability purposes. The Joke was the new home would be some corn field in Kansas. Of course, it would be in a real corn field. Chances are, it might be a civilian air strip somewhere else. The other side can't hit ALL the available air fields. That is going to be your new home. The base you left will probably be cinders. But you can recover and possibly relaunch Tankers and Bombers if need be. You will also have fully function Medical Facilities, security, etc.. It makes sure that the Military will still exist after the initial blasts. It also means that the Civilians will be able to rely on the Military for a lot of things to help keep their lives from going to crap. And the US Government will continue regardless.
You may not think this is important but it's damned important "The Day After".
You really have no idea just how hard it is to start a full blown Nuclear Exchange. It's designed today so that there can be no sneak attacks by either side. We have monitors and they have monitors. And then there are the spies up the ying yang by both sides. The Generals can't take a crap without the other side knowing how many squares he used of toilet paper. You have been watching way too many movies.
And just how are you going to take out major Air Force Operational Bases? And how are you going to take out the stateside bases with the fighters, bombers and supplies to resupply lost inventory as a war goes on in Europe? There is only one sure fired way. You drop a nice nuke package and it's done.
You drop a nuke package and the world ends after a nuclear winter.
Nucleophobia detected.Nuke......Why would you need nukes to take out an airbase...…..wtfRiiighhhttttt…..….. funny how many has US pulled off, no warning ……
You really have no idea just how hard it is to start a full blown Nuclear Exchange. It's designed today so that there can be no sneak attacks by either side. We have monitors and they have monitors. And then there are the spies up the ying yang by both sides. The Generals can't take a crap without the other side knowing how many squares he used of toilet paper. You have been watching way too many movies.
And just how are you going to take out major Air Force Operational Bases? And how are you going to take out the stateside bases with the fighters, bombers and supplies to resupply lost inventory as a war goes on in Europe? There is only one sure fired way. You drop a nice nuke package and it's done.
You drop a nuke package and the world ends after a nuclear winter.
First: "Nuclear winter" theory is a fake. In fact there can be "nuclear summer" as well.
Second: Even a year without summer/winter does not mean "the world end".
So what? There was an erruption in 1883 with total energy 100-200 Mt. There was a cold year after it, but not so cold as 1816. Human civilisation was not terminated, was not even significally harmed.Nucleophobia detected.Nuke......Why would you need nukes to take out an airbase...…..wtfYou really have no idea just how hard it is to start a full blown Nuclear Exchange. It's designed today so that there can be no sneak attacks by either side. We have monitors and they have monitors. And then there are the spies up the ying yang by both sides. The Generals can't take a crap without the other side knowing how many squares he used of toilet paper. You have been watching way too many movies.
And just how are you going to take out major Air Force Operational Bases? And how are you going to take out the stateside bases with the fighters, bombers and supplies to resupply lost inventory as a war goes on in Europe? There is only one sure fired way. You drop a nice nuke package and it's done.
You drop a nuke package and the world ends after a nuclear winter.
First: "Nuclear winter" theory is a fake. In fact there can be "nuclear summer" as well.
Second: Even a year without summer/winter does not mean "the world end".
See Krakatoa.
So what? There was an erruption in 1883 with total energy 100-200 Mt. There was a cold year after it, but not so cold as 1816. Human civilisation was not terminated, was not even significally harmed.Nucleophobia detected.Nuke......Why would you need nukes to take out an airbase...…..wtf
And just how are you going to take out major Air Force Operational Bases? And how are you going to take out the stateside bases with the fighters, bombers and supplies to resupply lost inventory as a war goes on in Europe? There is only one sure fired way. You drop a nice nuke package and it's done.
You drop a nuke package and the world ends after a nuclear winter.
First: "Nuclear winter" theory is a fake. In fact there can be "nuclear summer" as well.
Second: Even a year without summer/winter does not mean "the world end".
See Krakatoa.
Why? 200-500 Mt is one warhead of "Poseidon" torpedo. Even in the pessimistic scenario the Russians will have "Belgorod" and "Khabarovsk" (with six Poseidons each) at the end of this year. It means only 12 Krakatoas. Plus one 3-7Gt Santorini eruption for all strategic warheads.So what? There was an erruption in 1883 with total energy 100-200 Mt. There was a cold year after it, but not so cold as 1816. Human civilisation was not terminated, was not even significally harmed.Nucleophobia detected.And just how are you going to take out major Air Force Operational Bases? And how are you going to take out the stateside bases with the fighters, bombers and supplies to resupply lost inventory as a war goes on in Europe? There is only one sure fired way. You drop a nice nuke package and it's done.
You drop a nuke package and the world ends after a nuclear winter.
First: "Nuclear winter" theory is a fake. In fact there can be "nuclear summer" as well.
Second: Even a year without summer/winter does not mean "the world end".
See Krakatoa.
Now, multiply that by a factor of a thousand.
Why? 200-500 Mt is one warhead of "Poseidon" torpedo. Even in the pessimistic scenario the Russians will have "Belgorod" and "Khabarovsk" (with six Poseidons each) at the end of this year. It means only 12 Krakatoas. Plus one 3-7Gt Santorini eruption for all strategic warheads.So what? There was an erruption in 1883 with total energy 100-200 Mt. There was a cold year after it, but not so cold as 1816. Human civilisation was not terminated, was not even significally harmed.Nucleophobia detected.You drop a nuke package and the world ends after a nuclear winter.
First: "Nuclear winter" theory is a fake. In fact there can be "nuclear summer" as well.
Second: Even a year without summer/winter does not mean "the world end".
See Krakatoa.
Now, multiply that by a factor of a thousand.
May be, it is seriouse in the time of peace, but after a full-scale nuclear exchange, you know, climate change will be the last thing that we should worry about.
Ha! Its not about your experience. Its about your faith. You are an Environmentalist, aren't you? You believe in The Nuclear Winter, or The Global Warming, or Ozone Hole or any other environmentalistic eschatological nonsence not because of your real practical experience, but because of the environmentalistic propaganda.Why? 200-500 Mt is one warhead of "Poseidon" torpedo. Even in the pessimistic scenario the Russians will have "Belgorod" and "Khabarovsk" (with six Poseidons each) at the end of this year. It means only 12 Krakatoas. Plus one 3-7Gt Santorini eruption for all strategic warheads.So what? There was an erruption in 1883 with total energy 100-200 Mt. There was a cold year after it, but not so cold as 1816. Human civilisation was not terminated, was not even significally harmed.Nucleophobia detected.
First: "Nuclear winter" theory is a fake. In fact there can be "nuclear summer" as well.
Second: Even a year without summer/winter does not mean "the world end".
See Krakatoa.
Now, multiply that by a factor of a thousand.
May be, it is seriouse in the time of peace, but after a full-scale nuclear exchange, you know, climate change will be the last thing that we should worry about.
In my Navy days I was on the crew of Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarine and later served as a Nuclear Weapons Officer. Pardon my blunt language, but you don't have a fucking clue about what you are discussing and leave it at that.
Ha! Its not about your experience. Its about your faith. You are an Environmentalist, aren't you? You believe in The Nuclear Winter, or The Global Warming, or Ozone Hole or any other environmentalistic eschatological nonsence not because of your real practical experience, but because of the environmentalistic propaganda.Why? 200-500 Mt is one warhead of "Poseidon" torpedo. Even in the pessimistic scenario the Russians will have "Belgorod" and "Khabarovsk" (with six Poseidons each) at the end of this year. It means only 12 Krakatoas. Plus one 3-7Gt Santorini eruption for all strategic warheads.So what? There was an erruption in 1883 with total energy 100-200 Mt. There was a cold year after it, but not so cold as 1816. Human civilisation was not terminated, was not even significally harmed.See Krakatoa.
Now, multiply that by a factor of a thousand.
May be, it is seriouse in the time of peace, but after a full-scale nuclear exchange, you know, climate change will be the last thing that we should worry about.
In my Navy days I was on the crew of Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarine and later served as a Nuclear Weapons Officer. Pardon my blunt language, but you don't have a fucking clue about what you are discussing and leave it at that.
Oh, man... Why anybody should equate 0,5 Mt airburst with 200Mt groundburst? It is stupid.Ha! Its not about your experience. Its about your faith. You are an Environmentalist, aren't you? You believe in The Nuclear Winter, or The Global Warming, or Ozone Hole or any other environmentalistic eschatological nonsence not because of your real practical experience, but because of the environmentalistic propaganda.Why? 200-500 Mt is one warhead of "Poseidon" torpedo. Even in the pessimistic scenario the Russians will have "Belgorod" and "Khabarovsk" (with six Poseidons each) at the end of this year. It means only 12 Krakatoas. Plus one 3-7Gt Santorini eruption for all strategic warheads.So what? There was an erruption in 1883 with total energy 100-200 Mt. There was a cold year after it, but not so cold as 1816. Human civilisation was not terminated, was not even significally harmed.
Now, multiply that by a factor of a thousand.
May be, it is seriouse in the time of peace, but after a full-scale nuclear exchange, you know, climate change will be the last thing that we should worry about.
In my Navy days I was on the crew of Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarine and later served as a Nuclear Weapons Officer. Pardon my blunt language, but you don't have a fucking clue about what you are discussing and leave it at that.
Environmentalist? Man, you should pray they don't cancel the Olympics with that leap, you are a shoe-in for any team.
I know what happens when you take your numbers and multiply them by the entire nuclear inventories of the nuclear powers. Once you go nuclear, why stop?
I can see you have lost your argument, now is the time to slink off into obscurity.
Suicides among active enlisted highest in the Air Force.
Oh, man... Why anybody should equate 0,5 Mt airburst with 200Mt groundburst? It is stupid.Ha! Its not about your experience. Its about your faith. You are an Environmentalist, aren't you? You believe in The Nuclear Winter, or The Global Warming, or Ozone Hole or any other environmentalistic eschatological nonsence not because of your real practical experience, but because of the environmentalistic propaganda.Why? 200-500 Mt is one warhead of "Poseidon" torpedo. Even in the pessimistic scenario the Russians will have "Belgorod" and "Khabarovsk" (with six Poseidons each) at the end of this year. It means only 12 Krakatoas. Plus one 3-7Gt Santorini eruption for all strategic warheads.Now, multiply that by a factor of a thousand.
May be, it is seriouse in the time of peace, but after a full-scale nuclear exchange, you know, climate change will be the last thing that we should worry about.
In my Navy days I was on the crew of Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarine and later served as a Nuclear Weapons Officer. Pardon my blunt language, but you don't have a fucking clue about what you are discussing and leave it at that.
Environmentalist? Man, you should pray they don't cancel the Olympics with that leap, you are a shoe-in for any team.
I know what happens when you take your numbers and multiply them by the entire nuclear inventories of the nuclear powers. Once you go nuclear, why stop?
I can see you have lost your argument, now is the time to slink off into obscurity.
And even if we do so, 200 Gt is just something like Toba super-erruption. And, according the new studies there were no significant cooling after it.
Toba catastrophe theory - Wikipedia
Physical data contradicting the winter hypothesis
In 2013, archaeologists, led by Christine Lane, reported finding a microscopic layer of glassy volcanic ash in sediments of Lake Malawi, and definitively linked the ash to the 75,000-year-old Toba super-eruption, but found no change in fossil type close to the ash layer, something that would be expected following a severe volcanic winter. They concluded that the largest known volcanic eruption in the history of the human species did not significantly alter the climate of East Africa,[23][24] attracting criticism from Richard Roberts.[25] Lane explained, "We examined smear slides at a 2-mm interval, corresponding to subdecadal resolution, and X-ray fluorescence scans run at 200-µm intervals correspond to subannual resolution. We observed no obvious change in sediment composition or Fe/Ti ratio, suggesting that no thermally driven overturn of the water column occurred following the Toba supereruption."[26] In 2015, a new study on the climate of East Africa supported Lane's conclusion, that there was "no significant cooling associated with Mount Toba".[27]
Oh, man... Why anybody should equate 0,5 Mt airburst with 200Mt groundburst? It is stupid.Ha! Its not about your experience. Its about your faith. You are an Environmentalist, aren't you? You believe in The Nuclear Winter, or The Global Warming, or Ozone Hole or any other environmentalistic eschatological nonsence not because of your real practical experience, but because of the environmentalistic propaganda.Why? 200-500 Mt is one warhead of "Poseidon" torpedo. Even in the pessimistic scenario the Russians will have "Belgorod" and "Khabarovsk" (with six Poseidons each) at the end of this year. It means only 12 Krakatoas. Plus one 3-7Gt Santorini eruption for all strategic warheads.
May be, it is seriouse in the time of peace, but after a full-scale nuclear exchange, you know, climate change will be the last thing that we should worry about.
In my Navy days I was on the crew of Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarine and later served as a Nuclear Weapons Officer. Pardon my blunt language, but you don't have a fucking clue about what you are discussing and leave it at that.
Environmentalist? Man, you should pray they don't cancel the Olympics with that leap, you are a shoe-in for any team.
I know what happens when you take your numbers and multiply them by the entire nuclear inventories of the nuclear powers. Once you go nuclear, why stop?
I can see you have lost your argument, now is the time to slink off into obscurity.
And even if we do so, 200 Gt is just something like Toba super-erruption. And, according the new studies there were no significant cooling after it.
Toba catastrophe theory - Wikipedia
Physical data contradicting the winter hypothesis
In 2013, archaeologists, led by Christine Lane, reported finding a microscopic layer of glassy volcanic ash in sediments of Lake Malawi, and definitively linked the ash to the 75,000-year-old Toba super-eruption, but found no change in fossil type close to the ash layer, something that would be expected following a severe volcanic winter. They concluded that the largest known volcanic eruption in the history of the human species did not significantly alter the climate of East Africa,[23][24] attracting criticism from Richard Roberts.[25] Lane explained, "We examined smear slides at a 2-mm interval, corresponding to subdecadal resolution, and X-ray fluorescence scans run at 200-µm intervals correspond to subannual resolution. We observed no obvious change in sediment composition or Fe/Ti ratio, suggesting that no thermally driven overturn of the water column occurred following the Toba supereruption."[26] In 2015, a new study on the climate of East Africa supported Lane's conclusion, that there was "no significant cooling associated with Mount Toba".[27]
One nuke does not equal one volcano. The problem with your thinking is scale. Reassess your data for a massive world-wide nuclear strike. Too bad you apparently suck at math.
And that is the crux of it.According to Defense News, Air Force units will now head to the hills at the first sign of war, dispersing from their massive bases to local airports, isolated airstrips, any place that can support airplanes. The idea is to use those large bases not to concentrate air power but as a hub to feed dispersed air power, maintaining a steady flow of fuel, ammunition, and food to small detachments of fighters and other warplanes hiding at airfields adversaries may not even know about. U.S. Air Force Air Bases | Why Big Air Bases Are a Big Liability
The first sign of war will be these giant Airbases all burning at once. Speed of missiles these days fired from subs this must have Chinese laughing their ass off
from what I've read, though it is true that our enemies can strike us so quickly we would NOT be able to prevent mass destruction and death......AFTER the US was incinerated by (russia, china, n korea, iran....?)
our remaining forces would STILL be able to destroy the rest of the planet.
MAD.....
The chinese would not have long to laugh
No, we can't. Nobody can. We just don't have enough of nukes for it.And that is the crux of it.According to Defense News, Air Force units will now head to the hills at the first sign of war, dispersing from their massive bases to local airports, isolated airstrips, any place that can support airplanes. The idea is to use those large bases not to concentrate air power but as a hub to feed dispersed air power, maintaining a steady flow of fuel, ammunition, and food to small detachments of fighters and other warplanes hiding at airfields adversaries may not even know about. U.S. Air Force Air Bases | Why Big Air Bases Are a Big Liability
The first sign of war will be these giant Airbases all burning at once. Speed of missiles these days fired from subs this must have Chinese laughing their ass off
from what I've read, though it is true that our enemies can strike us so quickly we would NOT be able to prevent mass destruction and death......AFTER the US was incinerated by (russia, china, n korea, iran....?)
our remaining forces would STILL be able to destroy the rest of the planet.
MAD.....
The chinese would not have long to laugh
Even after a first strike, we can destroy the world
You going nuke over a conventiinal strike?And that is the crux of it.According to Defense News, Air Force units will now head to the hills at the first sign of war, dispersing from their massive bases to local airports, isolated airstrips, any place that can support airplanes. The idea is to use those large bases not to concentrate air power but as a hub to feed dispersed air power, maintaining a steady flow of fuel, ammunition, and food to small detachments of fighters and other warplanes hiding at airfields adversaries may not even know about. U.S. Air Force Air Bases | Why Big Air Bases Are a Big Liability
The first sign of war will be these giant Airbases all burning at once. Speed of missiles these days fired from subs this must have Chinese laughing their ass off
from what I've read, though it is true that our enemies can strike us so quickly we would NOT be able to prevent mass destruction and death......AFTER the US was incinerated by (russia, china, n korea, iran....?)
our remaining forces would STILL be able to destroy the rest of the planet.
MAD.....
The chinese would not have long to laugh
Even after a first strike, we can destroy the world
This thread isn't about nuke strikes ....stay on topicAnd that is the crux of it.According to Defense News, Air Force units will now head to the hills at the first sign of war, dispersing from their massive bases to local airports, isolated airstrips, any place that can support airplanes. The idea is to use those large bases not to concentrate air power but as a hub to feed dispersed air power, maintaining a steady flow of fuel, ammunition, and food to small detachments of fighters and other warplanes hiding at airfields adversaries may not even know about. U.S. Air Force Air Bases | Why Big Air Bases Are a Big Liability
The first sign of war will be these giant Airbases all burning at once. Speed of missiles these days fired from subs this must have Chinese laughing their ass off
from what I've read, though it is true that our enemies can strike us so quickly we would NOT be able to prevent mass destruction and death......AFTER the US was incinerated by (russia, china, n korea, iran....?)
our remaining forces would STILL be able to destroy the rest of the planet.
MAD.....
The chinese would not have long to laugh
Even after a first strike, we can destroy the world
Nuke......Why would you need nukes to take out an airbase...…..wtfRiiighhhttttt…..….. funny how many has US pulled off, no warning ……I think it's time to hear from the guys that actually practiced the mobility or bugout of the bases.
There is no "First Strike at a Minutes Notice" going to happen by anyone. it's going to take time to reprogram the missiles (target them), assemble forces, etc.. Think of days, not hours or minutes. While you are doing this, the other side isn't sitting idly by. They have people watching us and we have people watching them. As they progress closer to actually launching, before that, we have already loaded up our nukes, reprogrammed out missiles and warheads and started getting ready for the mobility. The closer it gets, the more the bugout gets to starting. At the last minute, the prepositioned pallets and personnel are loaded up and the move starts. This is done before the bombers and tankers launch. When they launch, a certain number of key personnel will bug out and literally move to another location for recovery or sustainability purposes. The Joke was the new home would be some corn field in Kansas. Of course, it would be in a real corn field. Chances are, it might be a civilian air strip somewhere else. The other side can't hit ALL the available air fields. That is going to be your new home. The base you left will probably be cinders. But you can recover and possibly relaunch Tankers and Bombers if need be. You will also have fully function Medical Facilities, security, etc.. It makes sure that the Military will still exist after the initial blasts. It also means that the Civilians will be able to rely on the Military for a lot of things to help keep their lives from going to crap. And the US Government will continue regardless.
You may not think this is important but it's damned important "The Day After".
You really have no idea just how hard it is to start a full blown Nuclear Exchange. It's designed today so that there can be no sneak attacks by either side. We have monitors and they have monitors. And then there are the spies up the ying yang by both sides. The Generals can't take a crap without the other side knowing how many squares he used of toilet paper. You have been watching way too many movies.
And just how are you going to take out major Air Force Operational Bases? And how are you going to take out the stateside bases with the fighters, bombers and supplies to resupply lost inventory as a war goes on in Europe? There is only one sure fired way. You drop a nice nuke package and it's done.
You drop a nuke package and the world ends after a nuclear winter.