Somebody in newmedia ask Must Obama this Question.

Republicans have LESS than nothing to offer the middle class.
 
"bin Laden determined to attack inside the United States"........

**** you, GOP.
 
What a shame that Guantamo was never set up to actually try and convict these prisoners - according to international or domestic law.

Who knows, they could be imprisoned forever - or executed.
Oh well, I suppose everyone knew what they were doing.

They were going to be tried by military tribunals years ago. It was some liberal lawyers, including Holder's law firm, that stepped in and stopped the trials in an attempt to guarantee civilian trials instead.

Still amazes me that the left wanted the terrorists to be treated like American citizens, with all rights, and yet they don't insist on the same for an innocent Marine being held in Mexico. Seriously, couldn't Obama trade 5 illegal alien criminals for the guy? Or at least talk to the Mexican government and let them know that they should show some respect for our people considering how the illegal aliens here in America have helped the Mexican government by sending billions in remittances each year. If they thought we were going to cut off the cash flow, they might come around.

Meanwhile, Obama helps terrorists more than he helps citizens.

The terrorists at GITMO would have been tried, and hopefully convicted, over a decade ago if not for the lawyers.
Do you know why Guantanamo Bay is in Cuba and not the United States? It's so that US law doesn't apply there. Therefore, lawyers don't apply there. Are you ******* retarded?

Lawyers don't have shit to say about anything in Guantanamo. Why are those prisoners there? Because they're terrorists? Why are these terrorists so important that they have to remain in custody, force-fed during hunger strikes after ten years, when President George W. Christ could have just killed them like any other terrorists and said, "**** international human rights laws. They were terrorists."

Why does the GOP insist on keeping those terrorists as prisoners but no one has any problem with killing other terrorists without charges or trials? Why do those Guantanamo prisoners need any kind of trial, military or civilian?
 
Somebody in newmedia must ask Obama this Question. Mr President if one or more of the terrorists you let go free today are the cause of one or more of our troops being killed,WHAT WILL YOU SAY TO AMERICANS THEN????????????????? Obama is the most clueless, weakest,worst president in USA history!!!!

Did any of those arms Reagan sent to Iran...any of that training/arms we gave to the Afghanis...did it kill any Americans later on?
Nope.

No hope. No change. No nothing.

Your loser buttpipe is such a loser that you have to compare him to someone that you hate.

Loser.

IED's? Weren't some of those that killed US servicemen made with leftover ordinance the Western Allies supplied Iraq with after Raygun took Iraq of the list of nations who support terrorist in the 1980's?
 
CaféAuLait;9205393 said:
Somebody in newmedia must ask Obama this Question. Mr President if one or more of the terrorists you let go free today are the cause of one or more of our troops being killed,WHAT WILL YOU SAY TO AMERICANS THEN????????????????? Obama is the most clueless, weakest,worst president in USA history!!!!

Did any of those arms Reagan sent to Iran...any of that training/arms we gave to the Afghanis...did it kill any Americans later on?

So we are going back decades.

What about Carter? Who stirred the freaking hornets nest? Shah of Iran ring any bells?

How about the arms buildup supplied by the US starting in 1967 - tens of thousands of U.S. technicians that were provided to Iran to install and maintain an enormous arsenal and to train Iranians to use it...

Blame Reagan all you like, but your history is lacking. Start in 1953 when the US and the UK started dabbling in their affairs to fix gas prices by removing Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and replacing him with the Shaw.

It is a good start.

"Ancient History": U.S. Conduct in the Middle East Since World War II and the Folly of Intervention | Cato Institute
 
Somebody in newmedia must ask Obama this Question. Mr President if one or more of the terrorists you let go free today are the cause of one or more of our troops being killed,WHAT WILL YOU SAY TO AMERICANS THEN????????????????? Obama is the most clueless, weakest,worst president in USA history!!!!

Did any of those arms Reagan sent to Iran...any of that training/arms we gave to the Afghanis...did it kill any Americans later on?

That's not the op.

We already know that holder's gun running killed a border patrol agent if you really want to go down that road.
 
You'd care if it was your son who came home in a body bag for having to track him down.

He is still an American citizen who has the right to due process as every american. You know that Constitution you say you love so much yet have no clue what's in there.

We tried for 5 years with no luck to find him. We probably got the best deal we could and got him back to give him his day in court if charges are brought.

Let's not be pissed that our government got back it's American citizens locked up abroad. Not everything is political.

You speak of the constitution and due process. Do you know who was the first President to kill an American since the civil war? None other then Obama all without due process. This guy is on the battle field. This guy supposedly was helping make bombs and perhaps teaching the Taliban how our men operate, HE was an immediate threat if the stories are true. HE was more worthy for a drone strike then was the 16 year old American that Obama DID take out without due process.

Only the kids father was taken out because he was deemed a threat for joining the terrorist group who planned and executed the 9-11 attacks on New York and DC. The 16 year old was not a target and is considered collateral damage. But you know that........
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom