Some truths about Charlotteville riot that the fake news media won't talk about

[Pogo]

Liberals used to back the Nazi's much like they now back the Islamic terrorists .

They still follow this construct. You saw it in the current protests/ riots.

Why Liberals Support Islamic Terrorism and Oppose Self-Defense Against It

Liberals have never 'backed Nazis' dear. They're philosophical polar opposites.

Hardly. They are both anti Semetic

Nothing about Liberalism is related to linguistics.

I oughta come down there and give you a good tongue lashing.

 

[Pogo]

The lib media is trying hard to make it appear that this group is nothing but a bunch of typical Trump supporters. Trump condemned them and angered leaders of the group.

Funny how they are careful to separate radical Muslims from the 'peaceful' Muslims but don't apply the same rule to other radicals when it doesn't fit their agenda.

The violence at Charlottesville was wrong but no where near as devastating as the regular violence we see from BLM or Black Panther groups. The rioters at Baltimore, Ferguson and other places were tolerated by the left. The senseless murders of cops all over the country were tolerated by the left. None of the groups were condemned for promoting and carrying out violence and murder.

Suddenly, the left is acting outraged at something that doesn't begin to compare to the violence over a single weekend in Chicago. The difference is that they believe they can somehow use the Charlotteville riots to paint the right in a bad light.

We've had Muslims driving cars into crowds of people and killing them but the lib media yawns and warns not to paint everyone with the same broad brush. Notice how that rule ceases to exist when they taste blood in the water and want to go after anyone on the right.

The supremacists behind this are a small group and represent no one but themselves. The media knows this but aren't going to pass up an opportunity to use propaganda to rile their ignorant supporters. They are on a mission to destroy Trump and are creating their usual fake news to do that.

"In the aftermath of Saturday’s Charlottesville, Virginia chaos — a physically violent conflict between disgusting white supremacist alt-right thugs and repulsive Antifa thugs, which culminated in a murderous attack by an apparent alt-righter on the Antifa crowd and other miscellaneous counter-protesters, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another 19 — the hot takes have been coming fast and furious.
Here are some of the things you need to know about the awful events of yesterday.

1. The Alt-Right Is Not Conservative. One of the hottest takes from the Left is that the alt-right represents the entire right — that what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia represented conservatives broadly. That’s factually incorrect, and intellectually dishonest. The alt-right is not just conservatives who like memes or who dislike Paul Ryan. The alt-right is a philosophy of white supremacy and white nationalism espoused by the likes of Vox Day, Richard Spencer, and Jared Taylor.

In the aftermath of Saturday’s Charlottesville, Virginia chaos — a physically violent conflict between disgusting white supremacist alt-right thugs and repulsive Antifa thugs, which culminated in a murderous attack by an apparent alt-righter on the Antifa crowd and other miscellaneous counter-protesters, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another 19 — the hot takes have been coming fast and furious.
Here are some of the things you need to know about the awful events of yesterday.

2. The Alt-Right Has Successfully Created The Impression There Are Lots Of Them. There Aren’t. Thanks to the hard work of alt-right apologists like Milo Yiannopoulos, the widespread perception has been created that the alt-right is a movement on the rise, with a fast-increasing number of devotees. The media have glommed onto the alt-right in order to smear the entire conservative movement with it. The alt-right is quite active online — according to the Anti-Defamation League, I was their top journalistic target in 2016, and I received nearly 8,000 anti-Semitic tweets during the election cycle — but they aren’t particularly large. They fill up comments sections at sites like Breitbart, and they email spam, and they prank call people, and they live on 4chan boards, but the vast majority of alt-right anti-Semitic tweets came from just 1,600 accounts."

7 Things You Need To Know About The Charlottesville Violence And White Supremacist Terror Attack

For the record, most incidences of violence were committed by counter protesters (i.e., the left). Is anyone surprised? .

Not surprised that you made that up, no.

 

[BlueGin]

Liberals used to back the Nazi's much like they now back the Islamic terrorists .

They still follow this construct. You saw it in the current protests/ riots.

Why Liberals Support Islamic Terrorism and Oppose Self-Defense Against It

Liberals have never 'backed Nazis' dear. They're philosophical polar opposites.

From the article...

"liberals held rallies agitating against war with Nazi Germany… because as long as Nazi Germany threatened Western capitalist powers, they were willing to collaborate with Hitler."

 

[Political Junky]

Liberals used to back the Nazi's much like they now back the Islamic terrorists .

They still follow this construct. You saw it in the current protests/ riots.

Why Liberals Support Islamic Terrorism and Oppose Self-Defense Against It

Liberals have never 'backed Nazis' dear. They're philosophical polar opposites.

From the article...

"liberals held rallies agitating against war with Nazi Germany… because as long as Nazi Germany threatened Western capitalist powers, they were willing to collaborate with Hitler."

Link?

 

[BlueGin]

Liberals used to back the Nazi's much like they now back the Islamic terrorists .

They still follow this construct. You saw it in the current protests/ riots.

Why Liberals Support Islamic Terrorism and Oppose Self-Defense Against It

Liberals have never 'backed Nazis' dear. They're philosophical polar opposites.

From the article...

"liberals held rallies agitating against war with Nazi Germany… because as long as Nazi Germany threatened Western capitalist powers, they were willing to collaborate with Hitler."

Link?

Already provided you even quoted it.

 

[Political Junky]

Liberals used to back the Nazi's much like they now back the Islamic terrorists .

They still follow this construct. You saw it in the current protests/ riots.

Why Liberals Support Islamic Terrorism and Oppose Self-Defense Against It

Liberals have never 'backed Nazis' dear. They're philosophical polar opposites.

From the article...

"liberals held rallies agitating against war with Nazi Germany… because as long as Nazi Germany threatened Western capitalist powers, they were willing to collaborate with Hitler."

Link?

Already provided you even quoted it.

^^ Bullshit

 

[Si modo]

Liberals used to back the Nazi's much like they now back the Islamic terrorists .

They still follow this construct. You saw it in the current protests/ riots.

Why Liberals Support Islamic Terrorism and Oppose Self-Defense Against It

Liberals have never 'backed Nazis' dear. They're philosophical polar opposites.

From the article...

"liberals held rallies agitating against war with Nazi Germany… because as long as Nazi Germany threatened Western capitalist powers, they were willing to collaborate with Hitler."

Link?

She linked to it above.

Although, she called an opinion piece an article. Not the same. Too bad that's not obvious to so many.

 

[BlueGin]

Liberals used to back the Nazi's much like they now back the Islamic terrorists .

They still follow this construct. You saw it in the current protests/ riots.

Why Liberals Support Islamic Terrorism and Oppose Self-Defense Against It

Liberals have never 'backed Nazis' dear. They're philosophical polar opposites.

From the article...

"liberals held rallies agitating against war with Nazi Germany… because as long as Nazi Germany threatened Western capitalist powers, they were willing to collaborate with Hitler."

Link?

Already provided you even quoted it.

^^ Bullshit

Hardly. It's even highlighted in red.

 

[OKTexas]

The lib media is trying hard to make it appear that this group is nothing but a bunch of typical Trump supporters. Trump condemned them and angered leaders of the group.

Funny how they are careful to separate radical Muslims from the 'peaceful' Muslims but don't apply the same rule to other radicals when it doesn't fit their agenda.

The violence at Charlottesville was wrong but no where near as devastating as the regular violence we see from BLM or Black Panther groups. The rioters at Baltimore, Ferguson and other places were tolerated by the left. The senseless murders of cops all over the country were tolerated by the left. None of the groups were condemned for promoting and carrying out violence and murder.

Suddenly, the left is acting outraged at something that doesn't begin to compare to the violence over a single weekend in Chicago. The difference is that they believe they can somehow use the Charlotteville riots to paint the right in a bad light.

We've had Muslims driving cars into crowds of people and killing them but the lib media yawns and warns not to paint everyone with the same broad brush. Notice how that rule ceases to exist when they taste blood in the water and want to go after anyone on the right.

The supremacists behind this are a small group and represent no one but themselves. The media knows this but aren't going to pass up an opportunity to use propaganda to rile their ignorant supporters. They are on a mission to destroy Trump and are creating their usual fake news to do that.

"In the aftermath of Saturday’s Charlottesville, Virginia chaos — a physically violent conflict between disgusting white supremacist alt-right thugs and repulsive Antifa thugs, which culminated in a murderous attack by an apparent alt-righter on the Antifa crowd and other miscellaneous counter-protesters, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another 19 — the hot takes have been coming fast and furious.
Here are some of the things you need to know about the awful events of yesterday.

1. The Alt-Right Is Not Conservative. One of the hottest takes from the Left is that the alt-right represents the entire right — that what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia represented conservatives broadly. That’s factually incorrect, and intellectually dishonest. The alt-right is not just conservatives who like memes or who dislike Paul Ryan. The alt-right is a philosophy of white supremacy and white nationalism espoused by the likes of Vox Day, Richard Spencer, and Jared Taylor.

In the aftermath of Saturday’s Charlottesville, Virginia chaos — a physically violent conflict between disgusting white supremacist alt-right thugs and repulsive Antifa thugs, which culminated in a murderous attack by an apparent alt-righter on the Antifa crowd and other miscellaneous counter-protesters, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another 19 — the hot takes have been coming fast and furious.
Here are some of the things you need to know about the awful events of yesterday.

2. The Alt-Right Has Successfully Created The Impression There Are Lots Of Them. There Aren’t. Thanks to the hard work of alt-right apologists like Milo Yiannopoulos, the widespread perception has been created that the alt-right is a movement on the rise, with a fast-increasing number of devotees. The media have glommed onto the alt-right in order to smear the entire conservative movement with it. The alt-right is quite active online — according to the Anti-Defamation League, I was their top journalistic target in 2016, and I received nearly 8,000 anti-Semitic tweets during the election cycle — but they aren’t particularly large. They fill up comments sections at sites like Breitbart, and they email spam, and they prank call people, and they live on 4chan boards, but the vast majority of alt-right anti-Semitic tweets came from just 1,600 accounts."

7 Things You Need To Know About The Charlottesville Violence And White Supremacist Terror Attack

Neo-Nazi website praises Trump’s Charlottesville speech - The Boston Globe

President Trump might have drawn widespread criticism for not immediately denouncing white supremacists after violent clashes in Charlottesville, Va., but at least one group seemed pleased by his comments: A neo-Nazi website.

Trump, while on a working vacation at his New Jersey golf club, addressed the nation Saturday soon after a car plowed into a group of anti-racist counter-protesters in Charlottesville, a college town where neo-Nazis and white nationalists had assembled for march. The president did not single out any group, instead blaming ‘‘many sides’’ for the violence.
<more>

And your point would be, what? It took two groups to do the fighting and at the time the President made his statement they didn't know who was driving the car, so he condemned the whole bunch. Of course facts have no bearing on regressive propaganda.


.

It's been known who did it for a while. What's he waiting on?

The WH put out another statement Sunday. Also if I remember right, one of the reasons Trump was elected is he didn't speak like a cookie cutter politician, and now you assholes are condemning him because he doesn't speak like a cookie cutter politician. Like I said, the left went there looking for a fight, they got more than they bargained for, Trump was correct in condemning all of them, had they ignored the march no of this would have happened. Like it or not the left showed up to shut down the constitutional free speech rights of US citizens, they should also be charged with civil rights violations if anyone is. Of course they are playing the victims now, and the press is playing right along.


.

 

[Political Junky]

The lib media is trying hard to make it appear that this group is nothing but a bunch of typical Trump supporters. Trump condemned them and angered leaders of the group.

Funny how they are careful to separate radical Muslims from the 'peaceful' Muslims but don't apply the same rule to other radicals when it doesn't fit their agenda.

The violence at Charlottesville was wrong but no where near as devastating as the regular violence we see from BLM or Black Panther groups. The rioters at Baltimore, Ferguson and other places were tolerated by the left. The senseless murders of cops all over the country were tolerated by the left. None of the groups were condemned for promoting and carrying out violence and murder.

Suddenly, the left is acting outraged at something that doesn't begin to compare to the violence over a single weekend in Chicago. The difference is that they believe they can somehow use the Charlotteville riots to paint the right in a bad light.

We've had Muslims driving cars into crowds of people and killing them but the lib media yawns and warns not to paint everyone with the same broad brush. Notice how that rule ceases to exist when they taste blood in the water and want to go after anyone on the right.

The supremacists behind this are a small group and represent no one but themselves. The media knows this but aren't going to pass up an opportunity to use propaganda to rile their ignorant supporters. They are on a mission to destroy Trump and are creating their usual fake news to do that.

"In the aftermath of Saturday’s Charlottesville, Virginia chaos — a physically violent conflict between disgusting white supremacist alt-right thugs and repulsive Antifa thugs, which culminated in a murderous attack by an apparent alt-righter on the Antifa crowd and other miscellaneous counter-protesters, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another 19 — the hot takes have been coming fast and furious.
Here are some of the things you need to know about the awful events of yesterday.

1. The Alt-Right Is Not Conservative. One of the hottest takes from the Left is that the alt-right represents the entire right — that what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia represented conservatives broadly. That’s factually incorrect, and intellectually dishonest. The alt-right is not just conservatives who like memes or who dislike Paul Ryan. The alt-right is a philosophy of white supremacy and white nationalism espoused by the likes of Vox Day, Richard Spencer, and Jared Taylor.

In the aftermath of Saturday’s Charlottesville, Virginia chaos — a physically violent conflict between disgusting white supremacist alt-right thugs and repulsive Antifa thugs, which culminated in a murderous attack by an apparent alt-righter on the Antifa crowd and other miscellaneous counter-protesters, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another 19 — the hot takes have been coming fast and furious.
Here are some of the things you need to know about the awful events of yesterday.

2. The Alt-Right Has Successfully Created The Impression There Are Lots Of Them. There Aren’t. Thanks to the hard work of alt-right apologists like Milo Yiannopoulos, the widespread perception has been created that the alt-right is a movement on the rise, with a fast-increasing number of devotees. The media have glommed onto the alt-right in order to smear the entire conservative movement with it. The alt-right is quite active online — according to the Anti-Defamation League, I was their top journalistic target in 2016, and I received nearly 8,000 anti-Semitic tweets during the election cycle — but they aren’t particularly large. They fill up comments sections at sites like Breitbart, and they email spam, and they prank call people, and they live on 4chan boards, but the vast majority of alt-right anti-Semitic tweets came from just 1,600 accounts."

7 Things You Need To Know About The Charlottesville Violence And White Supremacist Terror Attack

Neo-Nazi website praises Trump’s Charlottesville speech - The Boston Globe

President Trump might have drawn widespread criticism for not immediately denouncing white supremacists after violent clashes in Charlottesville, Va., but at least one group seemed pleased by his comments: A neo-Nazi website.

Trump, while on a working vacation at his New Jersey golf club, addressed the nation Saturday soon after a car plowed into a group of anti-racist counter-protesters in Charlottesville, a college town where neo-Nazis and white nationalists had assembled for march. The president did not single out any group, instead blaming ‘‘many sides’’ for the violence.
<more>

And your point would be, what? It took two groups to do the fighting and at the time the President made his statement they didn't know who was driving the car, so he condemned the whole bunch. Of course facts have no bearing on regressive propaganda.


.

It's been known who did it for a while. What's he waiting on?

The WH put out another statement Sunday. Also if I remember right, one of the reasons Trump was elected is he didn't speak like a cookie cutter politician, and now you assholes are condemning him because he doesn't speak like a cookie cutter politician. Like I said, the left went there looking for a fight, they got more than they bargained for, Trump was correct in condemning all of them, had they ignored the march no of this would have happened. Like it or not the left showed up to shut down the constitutional free speech rights of US citizens, they should also be charged with civil rights violations if anyone is. Of course they are playing the victims now, and the press is playing right along.


.

^^ Pitiful

 

[NYcarbineer]

The lib media is trying hard to make it appear that this group is nothing but a bunch of typical Trump supporters. Trump condemned them and angered leaders of the group.

Funny how they are careful to separate radical Muslims from the 'peaceful' Muslims but don't apply the same rule to other radicals when it doesn't fit their agenda.

The violence at Charlottesville was wrong but no where near as devastating as the regular violence we see from BLM or Black Panther groups. The rioters at Baltimore, Ferguson and other places were tolerated by the left. The senseless murders of cops all over the country were tolerated by the left. None of the groups were condemned for promoting and carrying out violence and murder.

Suddenly, the left is acting outraged at something that doesn't begin to compare to the violence over a single weekend in Chicago. The difference is that they believe they can somehow use the Charlotteville riots to paint the right in a bad light.

We've had Muslims driving cars into crowds of people and killing them but the lib media yawns and warns not to paint everyone with the same broad brush. Notice how that rule ceases to exist when they taste blood in the water and want to go after anyone on the right.

The supremacists behind this are a small group and represent no one but themselves. The media knows this but aren't going to pass up an opportunity to use propaganda to rile their ignorant supporters. They are on a mission to destroy Trump and are creating their usual fake news to do that.

"In the aftermath of Saturday’s Charlottesville, Virginia chaos — a physically violent conflict between disgusting white supremacist alt-right thugs and repulsive Antifa thugs, which culminated in a murderous attack by an apparent alt-righter on the Antifa crowd and other miscellaneous counter-protesters, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another 19 — the hot takes have been coming fast and furious.
Here are some of the things you need to know about the awful events of yesterday.

1. The Alt-Right Is Not Conservative. One of the hottest takes from the Left is that the alt-right represents the entire right — that what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia represented conservatives broadly. That’s factually incorrect, and intellectually dishonest. The alt-right is not just conservatives who like memes or who dislike Paul Ryan. The alt-right is a philosophy of white supremacy and white nationalism espoused by the likes of Vox Day, Richard Spencer, and Jared Taylor.

In the aftermath of Saturday’s Charlottesville, Virginia chaos — a physically violent conflict between disgusting white supremacist alt-right thugs and repulsive Antifa thugs, which culminated in a murderous attack by an apparent alt-righter on the Antifa crowd and other miscellaneous counter-protesters, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another 19 — the hot takes have been coming fast and furious.
Here are some of the things you need to know about the awful events of yesterday.

2. The Alt-Right Has Successfully Created The Impression There Are Lots Of Them. There Aren’t. Thanks to the hard work of alt-right apologists like Milo Yiannopoulos, the widespread perception has been created that the alt-right is a movement on the rise, with a fast-increasing number of devotees. The media have glommed onto the alt-right in order to smear the entire conservative movement with it. The alt-right is quite active online — according to the Anti-Defamation League, I was their top journalistic target in 2016, and I received nearly 8,000 anti-Semitic tweets during the election cycle — but they aren’t particularly large. They fill up comments sections at sites like Breitbart, and they email spam, and they prank call people, and they live on 4chan boards, but the vast majority of alt-right anti-Semitic tweets came from just 1,600 accounts."

7 Things You Need To Know About The Charlottesville Violence And White Supremacist Terror Attack

I've seen a million posts by RWnuts claiming that guilty and innocent Muslims can't be separated.

So fuck off.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

The moment I saw "cop killings were tolerated by the left", I immediately stopped reading, because that's simply not true.

A newb that wont last....

 

[Seawytch]

The moment I saw "cop killings were tolerated by the left", I immediately stopped reading, because that's simply not true.

They weren't condemned the way they condemn lesser things they try to pin on the right.

Obama's most memorable response was saying that we have a cop problem. And he praised BLM without criticizing them for calling for the murder of whites and cops.

After Dallas:

"There is no possible justification for these kinds of attacks or any violence against law enforcement. Anyone involved in the senseless murders will be held fully accountable. Justice will be done." - Barack Obama

After Baton Rouge:

"I condemn, in the strongest sense of the word, the attack on law enforcement in Baton Rouge. For the second time in two weeks, police officers who put their lives on the line for ours every day were doing their job when they were killed in a cowardly and reprehensible assault. These are attacks on public servants, on the rule of law, and on civilized society, and they have to stop.

"I’ve offered my full support, and the full support of the federal government, to Governor Edwards, Mayor Holden, the Sheriff’s Office, and the Baton Rouge Police Department. And make no mistake – justice will be done.

"We may not yet know the motives for this attack, but I want to be clear: there is no justification for violence against law enforcement. None. These attacks are the work of cowards who speak for no one. They right no wrongs. They advance no causes. The officers in Baton Rouge; the officers in Dallas – they were our fellow Americans, part of our community, part of our country, with people who loved and needed them, and who need us now – all of us – to be at our best.

"Today, on the Lord’s day, all of us stand united in prayer with the people of Baton Rouge, with the police officers who’ve been wounded, and with the grieving families of the fallen. May God bless them all." - Barack Obama

 

[Kosh]

The moment I saw "cop killings were tolerated by the left", I immediately stopped reading, because that's simply not true.

They weren't condemned the way they condemn lesser things they try to pin on the right.

Obama's most memorable response was saying that we have a cop problem. And he praised BLM without criticizing them for calling for the murder of whites and cops.

After Dallas:

"There is no possible justification for these kinds of attacks or any violence against law enforcement. Anyone involved in the senseless murders will be held fully accountable. Justice will be done." - Barack Obama

After Baton Rouge:

"I condemn, in the strongest sense of the word, the attack on law enforcement in Baton Rouge. For the second time in two weeks, police officers who put their lives on the line for ours every day were doing their job when they were killed in a cowardly and reprehensible assault. These are attacks on public servants, on the rule of law, and on civilized society, and they have to stop.

"I’ve offered my full support, and the full support of the federal government, to Governor Edwards, Mayor Holden, the Sheriff’s Office, and the Baton Rouge Police Department. And make no mistake – justice will be done.

"We may not yet know the motives for this attack, but I want to be clear: there is no justification for violence against law enforcement. None. These attacks are the work of cowards who speak for no one. They right no wrongs. They advance no causes. The officers in Baton Rouge; the officers in Dallas – they were our fellow Americans, part of our community, part of our country, with people who loved and needed them, and who need us now – all of us – to be at our best.

"Today, on the Lord’s day, all of us stand united in prayer with the people of Baton Rouge, with the police officers who’ve been wounded, and with the grieving families of the fallen. May God bless them all." - Barack Obama

And the far left drone just proven that Obama would not condemn the far left terrorist groups.

 

[bendog]

The lib media is trying hard to make it appear that this group is nothing but a bunch of typical Trump supporters. Trump condemned them and angered leaders of the group.

Funny how they are careful to separate radical Muslims from the 'peaceful' Muslims but don't apply the same rule to other radicals when it doesn't fit their agenda.

The violence at Charlottesville was wrong but no where near as devastating as the regular violence we see from BLM or Black Panther groups. The rioters at Baltimore, Ferguson and other places were tolerated by the left. The senseless murders of cops all over the country were tolerated by the left. None of the groups were condemned for promoting and carrying out violence and murder.

Suddenly, the left is acting outraged at something that doesn't begin to compare to the violence over a single weekend in Chicago. The difference is that they believe they can somehow use the Charlotteville riots to paint the right in a bad light.

We've had Muslims driving cars into crowds of people and killing them but the lib media yawns and warns not to paint everyone with the same broad brush. Notice how that rule ceases to exist when they taste blood in the water and want to go after anyone on the right.

The supremacists behind this are a small group and represent no one but themselves. The media knows this but aren't going to pass up an opportunity to use propaganda to rile their ignorant supporters. They are on a mission to destroy Trump and are creating their usual fake news to do that.

"In the aftermath of Saturday’s Charlottesville, Virginia chaos — a physically violent conflict between disgusting white supremacist alt-right thugs and repulsive Antifa thugs, which culminated in a murderous attack by an apparent alt-righter on the Antifa crowd and other miscellaneous counter-protesters, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another 19 — the hot takes have been coming fast and furious.
Here are some of the things you need to know about the awful events of yesterday.

1. The Alt-Right Is Not Conservative. One of the hottest takes from the Left is that the alt-right represents the entire right — that what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia represented conservatives broadly. That’s factually incorrect, and intellectually dishonest. The alt-right is not just conservatives who like memes or who dislike Paul Ryan. The alt-right is a philosophy of white supremacy and white nationalism espoused by the likes of Vox Day, Richard Spencer, and Jared Taylor.

In the aftermath of Saturday’s Charlottesville, Virginia chaos — a physically violent conflict between disgusting white supremacist alt-right thugs and repulsive Antifa thugs, which culminated in a murderous attack by an apparent alt-righter on the Antifa crowd and other miscellaneous counter-protesters, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another 19 — the hot takes have been coming fast and furious.
Here are some of the things you need to know about the awful events of yesterday.

2. The Alt-Right Has Successfully Created The Impression There Are Lots Of Them. There Aren’t. Thanks to the hard work of alt-right apologists like Milo Yiannopoulos, the widespread perception has been created that the alt-right is a movement on the rise, with a fast-increasing number of devotees. The media have glommed onto the alt-right in order to smear the entire conservative movement with it. The alt-right is quite active online — according to the Anti-Defamation League, I was their top journalistic target in 2016, and I received nearly 8,000 anti-Semitic tweets during the election cycle — but they aren’t particularly large. They fill up comments sections at sites like Breitbart, and they email spam, and they prank call people, and they live on 4chan boards, but the vast majority of alt-right anti-Semitic tweets came from just 1,600 accounts."

7 Things You Need To Know About The Charlottesville Violence And White Supremacist Terror Attack

Where in America did these "muslims drive cars into crowds of people," Clem?

 

[Seawytch]

The moment I saw "cop killings were tolerated by the left", I immediately stopped reading, because that's simply not true.

They weren't condemned the way they condemn lesser things they try to pin on the right.

Obama's most memorable response was saying that we have a cop problem. And he praised BLM without criticizing them for calling for the murder of whites and cops.

After Dallas:

"There is no possible justification for these kinds of attacks or any violence against law enforcement. Anyone involved in the senseless murders will be held fully accountable. Justice will be done." - Barack Obama

After Baton Rouge:

"I condemn, in the strongest sense of the word, the attack on law enforcement in Baton Rouge. For the second time in two weeks, police officers who put their lives on the line for ours every day were doing their job when they were killed in a cowardly and reprehensible assault. These are attacks on public servants, on the rule of law, and on civilized society, and they have to stop.

"I’ve offered my full support, and the full support of the federal government, to Governor Edwards, Mayor Holden, the Sheriff’s Office, and the Baton Rouge Police Department. And make no mistake – justice will be done.

"We may not yet know the motives for this attack, but I want to be clear: there is no justification for violence against law enforcement. None. These attacks are the work of cowards who speak for no one. They right no wrongs. They advance no causes. The officers in Baton Rouge; the officers in Dallas – they were our fellow Americans, part of our community, part of our country, with people who loved and needed them, and who need us now – all of us – to be at our best.

"Today, on the Lord’s day, all of us stand united in prayer with the people of Baton Rouge, with the police officers who’ve been wounded, and with the grieving families of the fallen. May God bless them all." - Barack Obama

And the far left drone just proven that Obama would not condemn the far left terrorist groups.

He condemned the actions of the individuals. He didn't condemn the Tea Party after this either.

Las Vegas shooting suspects left swastika, "Don't tread on me" flag on dead officers

 

[Avatar4321]

I've seen the statements the president has made over the weekend. I'm not really sure why the left is attacking the president for this based on those statements. He clearly doesn't support them, even casually

 

[Flash]

 

[OKTexas]

The lib media is trying hard to make it appear that this group is nothing but a bunch of typical Trump supporters. Trump condemned them and angered leaders of the group.

Funny how they are careful to separate radical Muslims from the 'peaceful' Muslims but don't apply the same rule to other radicals when it doesn't fit their agenda.

The violence at Charlottesville was wrong but no where near as devastating as the regular violence we see from BLM or Black Panther groups. The rioters at Baltimore, Ferguson and other places were tolerated by the left. The senseless murders of cops all over the country were tolerated by the left. None of the groups were condemned for promoting and carrying out violence and murder.

Suddenly, the left is acting outraged at something that doesn't begin to compare to the violence over a single weekend in Chicago. The difference is that they believe they can somehow use the Charlotteville riots to paint the right in a bad light.

We've had Muslims driving cars into crowds of people and killing them but the lib media yawns and warns not to paint everyone with the same broad brush. Notice how that rule ceases to exist when they taste blood in the water and want to go after anyone on the right.

The supremacists behind this are a small group and represent no one but themselves. The media knows this but aren't going to pass up an opportunity to use propaganda to rile their ignorant supporters. They are on a mission to destroy Trump and are creating their usual fake news to do that.

"In the aftermath of Saturday’s Charlottesville, Virginia chaos — a physically violent conflict between disgusting white supremacist alt-right thugs and repulsive Antifa thugs, which culminated in a murderous attack by an apparent alt-righter on the Antifa crowd and other miscellaneous counter-protesters, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another 19 — the hot takes have been coming fast and furious.
Here are some of the things you need to know about the awful events of yesterday.

1. The Alt-Right Is Not Conservative. One of the hottest takes from the Left is that the alt-right represents the entire right — that what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia represented conservatives broadly. That’s factually incorrect, and intellectually dishonest. The alt-right is not just conservatives who like memes or who dislike Paul Ryan. The alt-right is a philosophy of white supremacy and white nationalism espoused by the likes of Vox Day, Richard Spencer, and Jared Taylor.

In the aftermath of Saturday’s Charlottesville, Virginia chaos — a physically violent conflict between disgusting white supremacist alt-right thugs and repulsive Antifa thugs, which culminated in a murderous attack by an apparent alt-righter on the Antifa crowd and other miscellaneous counter-protesters, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another 19 — the hot takes have been coming fast and furious.
Here are some of the things you need to know about the awful events of yesterday.

2. The Alt-Right Has Successfully Created The Impression There Are Lots Of Them. There Aren’t. Thanks to the hard work of alt-right apologists like Milo Yiannopoulos, the widespread perception has been created that the alt-right is a movement on the rise, with a fast-increasing number of devotees. The media have glommed onto the alt-right in order to smear the entire conservative movement with it. The alt-right is quite active online — according to the Anti-Defamation League, I was their top journalistic target in 2016, and I received nearly 8,000 anti-Semitic tweets during the election cycle — but they aren’t particularly large. They fill up comments sections at sites like Breitbart, and they email spam, and they prank call people, and they live on 4chan boards, but the vast majority of alt-right anti-Semitic tweets came from just 1,600 accounts."

7 Things You Need To Know About The Charlottesville Violence And White Supremacist Terror Attack

Neo-Nazi website praises Trump’s Charlottesville speech - The Boston Globe

President Trump might have drawn widespread criticism for not immediately denouncing white supremacists after violent clashes in Charlottesville, Va., but at least one group seemed pleased by his comments: A neo-Nazi website.

Trump, while on a working vacation at his New Jersey golf club, addressed the nation Saturday soon after a car plowed into a group of anti-racist counter-protesters in Charlottesville, a college town where neo-Nazis and white nationalists had assembled for march. The president did not single out any group, instead blaming ‘‘many sides’’ for the violence.
<more>

And your point would be, what? It took two groups to do the fighting and at the time the President made his statement they didn't know who was driving the car, so he condemned the whole bunch. Of course facts have no bearing on regressive propaganda.


.

It's been known who did it for a while. What's he waiting on?

The WH put out another statement Sunday. Also if I remember right, one of the reasons Trump was elected is he didn't speak like a cookie cutter politician, and now you assholes are condemning him because he doesn't speak like a cookie cutter politician. Like I said, the left went there looking for a fight, they got more than they bargained for, Trump was correct in condemning all of them, had they ignored the march no of this would have happened. Like it or not the left showed up to shut down the constitutional free speech rights of US citizens, they should also be charged with civil rights violations if anyone is. Of course they are playing the victims now, and the press is playing right along.


.

^^ Pitiful

What's pitiful is your inability to refute the facts. What happened to the American spirit of "I may not agree with what you say, but I'll fight to the death for your right to say it."?

The lefts faux concern with constitutional rights while interfering with the rights of others is laughable.


.

 

[Dschrute3]

Democrat Fake News blame Russia yet?