Some predictions on the effects of the warming on ENSO

[Old Rocks]

Some scientists have made an interesting prediction concerning the ENSO patterns in the future. More predictable, but also more destructive. One can only hope they are mistaken.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Oh my

 

[EMH]

Where is the "warming?"

Not on this planet....

 

[Dante]

Where is the "warming?"

Not on this planet....

science denier alert!!!

Global Temperature - Earth Indicator - NASA Science

An annual analysis of air and sea surface temperatures tracks changes to the Earth's average global temperature.

science.nasa.gov

 

[Concerned American]

Oh my

Where's my tin hat? OMG, we're all gonna die!

 

[Dante]

Where's my tin hat? OMG, we're all gonna die!

Oh my

misrepresent all you want

denying science is just plain stupid

 

[EMH]

science denier alert!!!

Global Temperature - Earth Indicator - NASA Science

An annual analysis of air and sea surface temperatures tracks changes to the Earth's average global temperature.

science.nasa.gov

"surface temperatures" are from the surface of growing urban areas...

The urban heat island (UHI) effect is when metropolitan areas are significantly warmer than their rural surroundings due to human activities and materials. This is caused by the replacement of natural land cover with surfaces like asphalt and concrete that absorb and retain heat, as well as waste heat from buildings and vehicles, and a lack of vegetation.

The CO2 is actually in the ATMOSPHERE.

What did that data say?

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation from NBC - for more than three decades, the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely NO WARMING IN THE ATMOSPHERE during a period of rising CO2, and then were FUDGED in 2005...

There is NO ACTUAL DATA showing atmospheric "warming," just FUDGE.

Adding CO2 to atmosphere does not cause any warming.

Surface Air Pressure proves that and that Earth is not experiencing an ongoing net ice melt either, part of the reason why you cannot show us one single photo of "ocean rise."

 

[EMH]

denying science

science is not

FRAUD
FUDGING DATA
LYING
PARROTING

actual science is 100% on my side.

 

[Dante]

"surface temperatures" are from the surface of growing urban areas...

The urban heat island (UHI) effect is when metropolitan areas are significantly warmer than their rural surroundings due to human activities and materials. This is caused by the replacement of natural land cover with surfaces like asphalt and concrete that absorb and retain heat, as well as waste heat from buildings and vehicles, and a lack of vegetation.

The CO2 is actually in the ATMOSPHERE.

What did that data say?

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation from NBC - for more than three decades, the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely NO WARMING IN THE ATMOSPHERE during a period of rising CO2, and then were FUDGED in 2005...

There is NO ACTUAL DATA showing atmospheric "warming," just FUDGE.

Adding CO2 to atmosphere does not cause any warming.

Surface Air Pressure proves that and that Earth is not experiencing an ongoing net ice melt either, part of the reason why you cannot show us one single photo of "ocean rise."

ty

I'll go with what the scientists at NASA have to say on this

 

[EMH]

are you still posting here under that pathetically stupid name and profile pict?

Maybe you can answer a few basic climate questions for us...

Thread 'Any honest media person with the courage to actually ask climate questions?'

Feb 12, 2024

Apparently not.

Not on Faux

Not on RAV or OANN


What questions will the media never ask?


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



The Co2 Fraud is bilking America out of $200 billion per...

• EMH
• Replies: 92
• Forum: Media

• 
• 
• 

 

[Sunsettommy]

Old Rocks enduring pessimism continues with another misleading dishonest narrative.

I have showed you many times that very bad weather events aren't getting worse, do I have to once again make a fool of you showing the OFFICIAL data to expose your dishonest crap?

 

[elektra]

More moronic musings of one of our resident morons

Old crock, name one thing you were right about.

 

[westwall]

Some scientists have made an interesting prediction concerning the ENSO patterns in the future. More predictable, but also more destructive. One can only hope they are mistaken.

"Could"......
The magic weasel word....

That's not a prediction, moron.

 

[Old Rocks]

Maybe you can answer a few basic climate questions for us...

Thread 'Any honest media person with the courage to actually ask climate questions?'

Feb 12, 2024

Apparently not.

Not on Faux

Not on RAV or OANN


What questions will the media never ask?


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



The Co2 Fraud is bilking America out of $200 billion per...

• EMH
• Replies: 92
• Forum: Media

• 
• 
• 

All those questions have been answered. Repeating a lie a thousand times does not change it from being a lie. And that is all you have is lies. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Against that we have people like you that I doubt even have a GED. Hard choice whom to believe, right?

 

[westwall]

All those questions have been answered. Repeating a lie a thousand times does not change it from being a lie. And that is all you have is lies. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Against that we have people like you that I doubt even have a GED. Hard choice whom to believe, right?

You mean every scientifuc organization that derives its funding by perpetuating the fraud.

APPEALS TO AUTHORITY are logic fails for a reason, numbskull.

 

[Old Rocks]

"Could"......
The magic weasel word....

That's not a prediction, moron.

Such a lying dummy you remain. Yes, it is a prediction. If A happens, then B will likely result. If A happens, then B does not, the hypothesis is incorrect. If A happens, then B happens, it is one step toward being correct.

 

[westwall]

Such a lying dummy you remain. Yes, it is a prediction. If A happens, then B will likely result. If A happens, then B does not, the hypothesis is incorrect. If A happens, then B happens, it is one step toward being correct.

"Could" isn't a prediction, moron.

 

[Concerned American]

Such a lying dummy you remain. Yes, it is a prediction. If A happens, then B will likely result. If A happens, then B does not, the hypothesis is incorrect. If A happens, then B happens, it is one step toward being correct.

And if pigs could fly, you'd have to buy a more effective tin hat.

 

[EMH]

All those questions have been answered

YOU admitted answering question 1 that the AMOUNT OF ICE ON PLANET EARTH is about WHERE LAND IS, not CO2, THANKS.

Your other 4 answers were either wrong or dishonest/incomplete.

 

[EMH]

Hard choice whom to believe, right?

Always it is "who should I parrot" not WHAT DOES THE DATA PROVE...

• 
  
•