Some in Congress are less than satisfied with Pam.

[berg80]

Your feelings are not law.

Correct. The law trump signed is though.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Agreed. There needs to be some sort of, for lack of a better word, tribunal after this nightmare ends in 2029. The country can't afford to have another bunch of criminals escape accountability as the Bushies did.

The Bushies, Obamas, Bidens, and many others as well.

 

[buckeye]

Agreed. There needs to be some sort of, for lack of a better word, tribunal after this nightmare ends in 2029. The country can't afford to have another bunch of criminals escape accountability as the Bushies did.

Yet you don't support a "tribunal" to look into the constant covering up and gaslighting wrt Biden's OBVIOUS progressive dementia.

 

[j-mac]

Correct. The law trump signed is though.

Ok, show us where he broke that law.

 

[Augustine_]

Congressmen who pushed to release Epstein files say massive blackout doesn’t comply with law and ‘are exploring all options’ — including impeachment​

The Justice Department’s extensive redactions to the Jeffrey Epstein files on Friday don’t comply with the law that Congress passed last month mandating their disclosure, according to Rep. Ro Khanna.

The California Democrat and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., led the effort on the legislation, which required that the DOJ put out its entire trove of documents by today.


But he blasted the document dump and singled out one file from a New York grand jury where all 119 pages were blacked out.

“This despite a federal judge ordering them to release that document,” Khanna said in a video posted on X. “And our law requires them to explain redactions. There’s not a single explanation. That entire document was redacted. We have not seen the draft indictment that implicates other rich and powerful men who were on Epstein’s rape island who either watched the abuse of young girls or participated in the abuse of young girls in the sex trafficking.”

MSN

www.msn.com

At some point there really should be consequences for some high ranking official after all the laws that have been broken by the regime. Since trump has immunity Pam is the next in line. No AG has shirked their responsibility to stay faithful to the law like she has. Not even John Mitchell.

Do not post in red.

 --TK

If the Trump admin never faces any consequences for breaking the law, why would they ever feel the need to follow the law?

 

[Rogue AI]

My apologies to any other poster who started a thread about the authors of the discharge petition calling for the release of the Epstein files now considering articles of impeachment against the blonde sock puppet because of her egregious violation of the law.

You do know she is supposed to uphold the law, right?

These crybaby 'congress' critters are calling for impeachment to placate losers like you. The reality is they know they will never win in court if DOJ sues for a reasonable amount of time to vet the documents properly. If that should happen this little ***** Ro Khanna will run and hide under a rock until the next silly liberal manufactured 'crisis'. You loons are as pathetic as the scum you elect.

 

[berg80]

The Bushies, Obamas, Bidens, and many others as well.

Help me out here. Members of the Bush admin should have been tried for war crimes. What charges should be filed against the Obama or Biden admins that haven't already been debunked?

 

[struth]

Congressmen who pushed to release Epstein files say massive blackout doesn’t comply with law and ‘are exploring all options’ — including impeachment​

The Justice Department’s extensive redactions to the Jeffrey Epstein files on Friday don’t comply with the law that Congress passed last month mandating their disclosure, according to Rep. Ro Khanna.

The California Democrat and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., led the effort on the legislation, which required that the DOJ put out its entire trove of documents by today.


But he blasted the document dump and singled out one file from a New York grand jury where all 119 pages were blacked out.

“This despite a federal judge ordering them to release that document,” Khanna said in a video posted on X. “And our law requires them to explain redactions. There’s not a single explanation. That entire document was redacted. We have not seen the draft indictment that implicates other rich and powerful men who were on Epstein’s rape island who either watched the abuse of young girls or participated in the abuse of young girls in the sex trafficking.”

MSN

www.msn.com

At some point there really should be consequences for some high ranking official after all the laws that have been broken by the regime. Since trump has immunity Pam is the next in line. No AG has shirked their responsibility to stay faithful to the law like she has. Not even John Mitchell.

Do not post in red.

 --TK

Members of Congress don’t get to decide what is the law, they make law, they don’t get to decide what is law, the judicial branch does

They might have an idea of what they intended, but others, including Bondi have to review the language and comply…not to mention with other laws

She’s released over 60k pages, with only about a total of 500 redacted

The ones crying are the ones that want to ignore the content that isn’t…ie Dems

 

[TNHarley]

She lied. She broke federal law. Impeach her ass.

 

[berg80]

Yet you don't support a "tribunal" to look into the constant covering up and gaslighting wrt Biden's OBVIOUS progressive dementia.

Do you think another whataboutism, this one calling for a review of Biden's mental decline, will change any of the facts regarding Pam's defiance.........not only of the law passed to force the regime to release the Epstein file..........but the congressional subpoena to the same effect?

House Oversight Committee subpoenas the Justice Department for Epstein files​

https://www.npr.org/2025/08/05/nx-s1-5493371/house-oversight-committee-epstein-subpoenas-justice-department

 

[berg80]

Unpacking claim Trump's name was redacted by DOJ from Epstein document after release

There was no proof the DOJ redacted the document after posting it. In fact, there was a copy of it on the DOJ website that didn't redact Trump's name.

www.snopes.com

It spends a lot of time focusing on whether the DoJ did or didn't redact trump's name. I think the focus should be on.........

Comparing the two versions, it is clear that in the first batch, each mention of Trump had been redacted. In the less-redacted version of the document, the passage read (emphasis ours):

She confided in me about her casual "friendship" with Donald. Mr Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her "pert nipples".

Donald Trump liked flicking and sucking her nipples until they were raw. One evening when we were showering together she showed me her nipples. They looked incredibly painful as they were red and swollen and I remember wincing when I looked at them. I also know she had sexual relations with Trump at Jeffery's NY mansion on regular occasions as I once met Jen for coffee, just before she was going to meet Trump and Epstein together at his mansion.

Anybody agree?

 

[Crepitus]

Unpacking claim Trump's name was redacted by DOJ from Epstein document after release

There was no proof the DOJ redacted the document after posting it. In fact, there was a copy of it on the DOJ website that didn't redact Trump's name.

www.snopes.com

It spends a lot of time focusing on whether the DoJ did or didn't redact trump's name. I think the focus should be on.........

Comparing the two versions, it is clear that in the first batch, each mention of Trump had been redacted. In the less-redacted version of the document, the passage read (emphasis ours):



Anybody agree?

He's totally unhinged and no one is bothering to restrain him.

Lots of folks, particularly media folks, are terrified of him right now.

Freedom of the press is under tremendous strain right now.

 

[Mac1958]

Lots of folks, particularly media folks, are terrified of him right now.

Freedom of the press is under tremendous strain right now.

Yeah, this is key. The one thing that the major press can't afford to lose is access, and that's what he's doing. He went after the NYT last night, saying they "must be dealt with and stopped". So now the press is terrified of him.

It couldn't be more clear, and the world has seen it before.

 

[The Breeze]

Yeah, this is key. The one thing that the major press can't afford to lose is access, and that's what he's doing. He went after the NYT last night, saying they "must be dealt with and stopped". So now the press is terrified of him.

It couldn't be more clear, and the world has seen it before.

Lol!

 

[hadit]

Yeah, this is key. The one thing that the major press can't afford to lose is access, and that's what he's doing. He went after the NYT last night, saying they "must be dealt with and stopped". So now the press is terrified of him.

It couldn't be more clear, and the world has seen it before.

I thought the press was all noble and brave and stuff.

 

[Crepitus]

Yeah, this is key. The one thing that the major press can't afford to lose is access, and that's what he's doing. He went after the NYT last night, saying they "must be dealt with and stopped". So now the press is terrified of him.

It couldn't be more clear, and the world has seen it before.

We are basically living in 1930's Germany right now.

 

[Mac1958]

We are basically living in 1930's Germany right now.

And I always wonder, does the flock not see it, or is it what they actually want?

Some of one, some of the other, I guess.

 

[hadit]

We are basically living in 1930's Germany right now.

Godwin's. Automatic fail.

 

[buckeye]

Do you think another whataboutism, this one calling for a review of Biden's mental decline, will change any of the facts regarding Pam's defiance.........not only of the law passed to force the regime to release the Epstein file..........but the congressional subpoena to the same effect?

Of course not. And I'm just not as certain as you that Pam is defiant. TDS sufferers always have their hair on fire about everything Clinton/Epstein files.

Do you think we should investigate the use of the autopen on every single EO and pardon, except for who was it? Hunter? That Biden actually signed? Or all the false statement coming from democrats gaslighting the American people that Biden was doing cartwheels while what we saw is a guy who could hardly walk?

That the DNC lied, Biden's staff lied, his family lied, his doctor ALL lied about his fitness for office for years?

Should we investigate this?

 

[berg80]

Yeah, this is key. The one thing that the major press can't afford to lose is access, and that's what he's doing. He went after the NYT last night, saying they "must be dealt with and stopped". So now the press is terrified of him.

It couldn't be more clear, and the world has seen it before.

President Trump on Tuesday condemned a New York Times report outlining his proximity to Jeffrey Epstein amid the disgraced financier’s illegal activities tied to an underground sex trafficking ring.

“The Failing New York Times, and their lies and purposeful misrepresentations, is a serious threat to the National Security of our Nation,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5660820-trump-condemns-ny-times-epstein/

If he's confused enough to conflate a threat to national security with a threat to his reputation then is he fit to lead the country?