Your Knee hurts.
You could go to a local GP.
You could go to a local clinic.
You could go to an urgent care.
You could go to a hospital and make an appointment.
You could go to the ER.
Which do you do?
Well let's look at the incentives. Under a free health care system, the cost to you is equally nothing, no matter where you go.
Why would you go to a GP, when you could go to the ER, and get seen immediately, for no extra cost to you?
When Massachusetts enacted universal health care, the first thing that happened was wait times at the ER drastically increased. Nearly double the wait time of the national average.... of course the average include non-public hospitals that charge fees for usage.
This is unavoidable. This is why in many government run systems, you have no choice but to see a GP first, who must prescribe you going to a specialist, who must prescribe you going to a clinic, and so on.
It's a method of rationing the care.
Another example is, the doctor asks you how much it hurts, and you say.... 10 out of 10, so he gives you prescription for oxicodine. Does it really hurt that bad? Maybe you could deal with something less powerful?
But since the cost is the same to you, why not go for the best stuff you can?
I had a co-worker that said they made $500 a month off of selling extra oxicodine. When the doctor asked how much pain he was in... oh yeah massive pain. Of course medicaid was covering most of the cost. Great for the doctor, great for the druggies, and great for him. Bad for the country.
I'm not saying it doesn't have its problems. But nowhere near the problems the US system has. I've said this before, my wife got offered two jobs - one in Aust one in the US. It wasn't even close when we looked at the health premiums we'd have to pay. I wont' even go into how litigious your system is. I can think of 14 countries off the top of my head where I'd rather get sick than the US.
You are crazy. You have a better chance of being treated and healed in the US, than anywhere else in the world. There's a reason most of the world comes to the US for care. People from Canada come to the US for care. People from the UK come to the US for care. People from Australia come to the US for care.
Ironically, my parents just a few months ago, showed me pictures of a husband and wife who came to the US for care, for their child, because they were told Australia simply doesn't provide treatment for his illness. They flew all they way to the US, and spent tons of money they borrowed, to get care for their child.
How do I know this? MY parents church runs a ministry for hospitals, where they volunteer to meet with, hang out with, provide food for, and other services for people who fly to the US to get care, because often they have no one here to talk to, or have much money to live on.
If you fall down and break your arm, and need a splint... sure any health care system can do this. But if you need real life or death treatment, you have a better chance of survival here in the US, than anywhere else in the world.
Now don't get me wrong, Australia has very good care compared to the entire world... and it even has pretty good care compared to the US. Of course it's still very expensive compared to Europe, which is why it's that good.
But when you say there are dozens of places you would rather be than in the US health care system... crazy talk. You are comparing health care costs alone, without comparing how good the system actually is. They are not the same. They pay less, because they get less.
And the UK system specifically is in a critical nightmare state. If you think you get the same care, there, that you do here, then you are simply ignorant. I've been there. It's not the same. Not even close.