Socialist Democrats Messing With Tradition Again!!!

[guno]

Put Clarence Thomas on the $20.

why would anyone do that? he's an embarrassment to the judiciary.

nice try though.

That asshole occupying OUR White House is an embarrassment to the nation and a joke to leaders around the World. I have more respect for Vladimir Putin than I do that MF who thinks he's a world leader. Clarence Thomas is always voting on the right side of constitutional matters and I look forward to his likeness on our currency as the first black SCOTUS Justice who voted constitutionally and didn't rely on Party ideology.

the only assholes are you bitter crackas that pine for the 1950's

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Yo, another reason to Vote Republican!!!

Jackson Gone from 20
View attachment 71727

by BREITBART NEWS16 Apr 20162,393

Kevin Liptak and Antoine Sanfuentes write at CNN Money:

Treasury Secretary Jack Lew is expected to announce this week that Alexander Hamilton’s face will remain on the front of the $10 bill and a woman will replace Andrew Jackson on the face of the $20 bill, a senior government source told CNN on Saturday.

Lew announced last summer that he was considering redesigning the $10 bill to include the portrait of a woman. The decision to make the historic change at the expense of Hamilton drew angry rebukes from fans of the former Treasury Secretary. The pro-Hamilton movement gained steam after the smash success of the hip-hop Broadway musical about his life this year.


Those pressures led Lew to determine that Hamilton should remain on the front of the bill. Instead, a mural-style depiction of the women’s suffrage movement — including images of leaders such as Susan B. Anthony — will be featured on the back of the bill.

A Treasury spokesman declined to comment on the pending changes. But Lew hinted that a decision could come this week.

“When we started this conversation not quite a year ago, it wasn’t clear to me that millions of Americans were going to weigh in with their ideas,” he told CNBC. “We’re not just talking about one bill. We’re talking about the $5, the $10, and the $20. We’re not just talking about one picture on one bill. We’re talking about using the front and the back of the bill to tell an exciting set of stories.”

Jackson Gone from 20 - Breitbart

"GTP"
View attachment 71728

why is tradition always good?

some traditions are bad.

jackson was a murderous cretin

So we're Lincoln and Grant. You want their images replaced, too?

e
Lincoln and Grant weren't murderous cretins. they had to deal with treasonous slave owners. big difference.

I'm referring to all the Indians they killed.

I don't think what they did comes close to the trail of tears. But I'm listening. Go on.

Although it's native Americans. But ok.

They are Aboriginal Americans, not that stupid term Native Americans. You people need to learn the proper terminology for people. For example, it'sTransvestite and not transgendered. No one has transferred their biology from male to female.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Jackson was an uber conservative of the first half of the 19th century, a slave owner, an Indian killer, and would have put Odium in the cotton fields as a white slave.

Jackson was a Democrat and no different from Democrats today.

And your statement is why informed America laughs you and your ilk.

 

[JakeStarkey]

why is tradition always good?

some traditions are bad.

jackson was a murderous cretin

So we're Lincoln and Grant. You want their images replaced, too?

e
Lincoln and Grant weren't murderous cretins. they had to deal with treasonous slave owners. big difference.

I'm referring to all the Indians they killed.

I don't think what they did comes close to the trail of tears. But I'm listening. Go on.

Although it's native Americans. But ok.

They are Aboriginal Americans, not that stupid term Native Americans. You people need to learn the proper terminology for people. For example, it'sTransvestite and not transgendered. No one has transferred their biology from male to female.

You are not the boss of America, you dweeb.

 

[jillian]

why is tradition always good?

some traditions are bad.

jackson was a murderous cretin

So we're Lincoln and Grant. You want their images replaced, too?

e
Lincoln and Grant weren't murderous cretins. they had to deal with treasonous slave owners. big difference.

I'm referring to all the Indians they killed.

I don't think what they did comes close to the trail of tears. But I'm listening. Go on.

Although it's native Americans. But ok.

They are Aboriginal Americans, not that stupid term Native Americans. You people need to learn the proper terminology for people. For example, it'sTransvestite and not transgendered. No one has transferred their biology from male to female.

no one calls them aboriginal americans you moron.

a transvestite and someone transgendered are not the same thing.

damn you're stupid.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Jackson was an uber conservative of the first half of the 19th century, a slave owner, an Indian killer, and would have put Odium in the cotton fields as a white slave.

Jackson was a Democrat and no different from Democrats today.

And your statement is why informed America laughs you and your ilk.

Are you saying Jackson wasn't a Democrat?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Jackson was an uber conservative of the first half of the 19th century, a slave owner, an Indian killer, and would have put Odium in the cotton fields as a white slave.

Jackson was a Democrat and no different from Democrats today.

And your statement is why informed America laughs you and your ilk.

Are you saying Jackson wasn't a Democrat?

Are you saying he was not an uber conservative who would fit well into our far right wing of the GOP?

Your argument does not resonate with the great majority of the American electorate and never will.

 

[FA_Q2]

Put Clarence Thomas on the $20.

why would anyone do that? he's an embarrassment to the judiciary.

nice try though.

Yes, degenerate his accomplishments because he dose not have the same political slant that you share.

That really is rather pathetic.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Put Clarence Thomas on the $20.

why would anyone do that? he's an embarrassment to the judiciary.

nice try though.

Yes, degenerate his accomplishments because he dose not have the same political slant that you share.

That really is rather pathetic.

dose? He is the SCOTUS lightweight since Abe Fortas.

 

[Stephanie]

chip chip chip away at our country one dollar bill at a time. hey why should we care about the COST of something so Unimportant to the majority of the people. Money is no problem for this administration TO WASTE on such nonsense. that could go to fund our VETS INSTEAD.

Remember the quarters they screwed around with?

 

[jillian]

Put Clarence Thomas on the $20.

why would anyone do that? he's an embarrassment to the judiciary.

nice try though.

Yes, degenerate his accomplishments because he dose not have the same political slant that you share.

That really is rather pathetic.

it's not about his politics. That's a lie. I've never said any such thing about Scalia or Alito (though they've perverted our body of caselaw). Thomas never was competent for the bench. and he's been an incompetent judge.

the fact that you think because he's a wing nut that he has value is your problem. and i reiterate, giving him thurgood marshall's seat was an embarrassment.

your defense of him is what's pathetic.

 

[JoeB131]

Lucy, quit being a dodo. Jefferson had some value, all Jackson did was sell out Indians, slaves, and the working class as he destroyed the Bank.

Far right do like Jackson because many of them like his negative values

Why not replace Jackson with a woman? Do you hate women, Lucy, and their accomplishments?

I find myself in the uncomfortable position of agreeing with the Wingnuts on this one. Taking Jackson off the $20 is the kind of political whitewashing the Soviets used to do when someone fell "out of favor" with the politburo.

Did Jackson do some awful things. Meh, maybe. But blaming him personally for these things when that was the popular opinion of the time is a little disingenuous.

I also don't think any of the people they've proposed to replace him are historically significant enough to merit being on the currency.

 

[JoeB131]

chip chip chip away at our country one dollar bill at a time. hey why should we care about the COST of something so Unimportant to the majority of the people. Money is no problem for this administration TO WASTE on such nonsense. that could go to fund our VETS INSTEAD.

Remember the quarters they screwed around with?

Yes, I do. The government raised a lot of money selling those coin sets to coin collectors and got a lot of people interested in history and such. The commemorative coins were actually a boon to the economy for how little it cost to do it.

On the other hand, the attempt to create 1 dollar coins honoring all the presidents, not so much.

We'd save hundreds of millions of dollars replacing paper dollar bills with $1.00 coins.

 

[jillian]

Lucy, quit being a dodo. Jefferson had some value, all Jackson did was sell out Indians, slaves, and the working class as he destroyed the Bank.

Far right do like Jackson because many of them like his negative values

Why not replace Jackson with a woman? Do you hate women, Lucy, and their accomplishments?

I find myself in the uncomfortable position of agreeing with the Wingnuts on this one. Taking Jackson off the $20 is the kind of political whitewashing the Soviets used to do when someone fell "out of favor" with the politburo.

Did Jackson do some awful things. Meh, maybe. But blaming him personally for these things when that was the popular opinion of the time is a little disingenuous.

I also don't think any of the people they've proposed to replace him are historically significant enough to merit being on the currency.

or maybe they wanted to move someone off so we can finally have a woman on a paper bill....

and he was the least regarded person.

i wouldn't lose sleep over it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Good night, Andrew.

 

[JakeStarkey]

why is tradition always good?

some traditions are bad.

jackson was a murderous cretin

So we're Lincoln and Grant. You want their images replaced, too?

e
Lincoln and Grant weren't murderous cretins. they had to deal with treasonous slave owners. big difference.

I'm referring to all the Indians they killed.

All Republicans.

I don't think what they did comes close to the trail of tears. But I'm listening. Go on.

Although it's native Americans. But ok.

The Dakota Wars took place under Lincoln. He oversaw the largest mass execution in American history. I'm 1864 Navajos were force marched to a reservation in New Mexico. Ultimately 2,000 people died from exhaustion, exposure and starvation.

Grant invented the reservation and killed untold thousand enforcing that policy.

Lincoln and Grant were Republicans.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Jackson was an uber conservative of the first half of the 19th century, a slave owner, an Indian killer, and would have put Odium in the cotton fields as a white slave.

Jackson was a Democrat and no different from Democrats today.

Fly that in a reputable history or government class and it will be shot down.

Your PR is meaningless.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Put Clarence Thomas on the $20.

why would anyone do that? he's an embarrassment to the judiciary.

nice try though.

Yes, degenerate his accomplishments because he dose not have the same political slant that you share.

That really is rather pathetic.

Yep, Hitler could follow your advice. You are rather pathetic.

 

[FA_Q2]

Put Clarence Thomas on the $20.

why would anyone do that? he's an embarrassment to the judiciary.

nice try though.

Yes, degenerate his accomplishments because he dose not have the same political slant that you share.

That really is rather pathetic.

Yep, Hitler could follow your advice. You are rather pathetic.

How, pray tell, did you manage to apply moors law here?

Never mind, It would continue to be pointless drivel.

 

[FA_Q2]

Put Clarence Thomas on the $20.

why would anyone do that? he's an embarrassment to the judiciary.

nice try though.

Yes, degenerate his accomplishments because he dose not have the same political slant that you share.

That really is rather pathetic.

it's not about his politics. That's a lie. I've never said any such thing about Scalia or Alito (though they've perverted our body of caselaw). Thomas never was competent for the bench. and he's been an incompetent judge.

the fact that you think because he's a wing nut that he has value is your problem. and i reiterate, giving him thurgood marshall's seat was an embarrassment.

your defense of him is what's pathetic.

I didn't defend him because you have not attacked him - just a blanket statement that he is incompetent. That is inane. Further, it was not HIS political slant I was refering to but YOURS.