Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
Only if you are self-employed.SS takes very little from one's paycheck.
Only 12.4% of your income.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only if you are self-employed.SS takes very little from one's paycheck.
Only 12.4% of your income.
Especially since retirement age is now 67. Duh!Or, if you die on your 65th birthday, you can leave your grandkids penniless.
My buddy and I were talking about this last night. His dad died 40 years ago with a Chrysler pension. His mom, probably in her 90's now, is still collecting probably 75% of it. Every month.Here's one concern. Did you know that 401K's were supposed to be ON TOP of pensions? They weren't supposed to replace them.
Companies can't afford to pay pensions for 30 or 40 years.
My buddy and I were talking about this last night. His dad died 40 years ago with a Chrysler pension. His mom, probably in her 90's now, is still collecting probably 75% of it. Every month.
But funny companies can afford to pay CEO's 1322% of what they used to. That they can afford?
So let's flip this. Let's say it's not the employees who are being paid too much. How much do Trump's silicon valley tech bros make a year? They are BILLIONAIRES. Well, it turns out China can make what they do better and for less. Perhaps like we shipped those union car jobs overseas, we should consider buying AI from China. Why is silicon valley gouging us? I'll tell you why. Because of the CEO's salaries.
When American companies can pay their CEO's so much more than Chinese CEO's and provide a similar product for a similar price, let me know. Until then, us Americans should not be forced to buy from silicon valley.
Just like you said Honda and Toyota make better cars for less, China now makes better AI than American companies and cheaper.
His mom, probably in her 90's now, is still collecting probably 75% of it. Every month.
That's awesome!
But funny companies can afford to pay CEO's 1322% of what they used to.
Just the top 400 or so.
How much do Trump's silicon valley tech bros make a year? They are BILLIONAIRES.
That's awful! Is that salary from a company? Link?
Perhaps like we shipped those union car jobs overseas, we should consider buying AI from China.
You should definitely do that. Keep me posted.
Until then, us Americans should not be forced to buy from silicon valley.
I agree, you should not be forced to buy AI from Silicon Valley.
In fiscal year 2023, Nikesh Arora, the CEO of Palo Alto Networks, earned $151.43 million.
In 2024, Hock Tan the CEO of Broadcom, earned $161.83 million in total compensation.
Maybe he's not yet. But remember Trump had $3 billion now I think he has $65 billion.Nikesh is worth a couple of billion, I can't see proof that Hock is a billionaire.
Maybe he's not yet. But remember Trump had $3 billion now I think he has $65 billion.
Elon now has $400 billion. Last I checked. This is a new guilded age. The $1 million I will have when I retire might not be that much in 6 years.
For better or worse, we are the "world's policeman". If any country can't undercut us when building a product, they simply aren't trying hard enough.My buddy and I were talking about this last night. His dad died 40 years ago with a Chrysler pension. His mom, probably in her 90's now, is still collecting probably 75% of it. Every month.
But funny companies can afford to pay CEO's 1322% of what they used to. That they can afford?
So let's flip this. Let's say it's not the employees who are being paid too much. How much do Trump's silicon valley tech bros make a year? They are BILLIONAIRES. Well, it turns out China can make what they do better and for less. Perhaps like we shipped those union car jobs overseas, we should consider buying AI from China. Why is silicon valley gouging us? I'll tell you why. Because of the CEO's salaries.
When American companies can pay their CEO's so much more than Chinese CEO's and provide a similar product for a similar price, let me know. Until then, us Americans should not be forced to buy from silicon valley.
Just like you said Honda and Toyota make better cars for less, China now makes better AI than American companies and cheaper.
For better or worse, we are the "world's policeman". If any country can't undercut us when building a product, they simply aren't trying hard enough.
SS takes very little from one's paycheck. But the benefits of getting it back are great. If you're pretty well off and don't need the money, you can give to your grandkids and help them pay for college or something equally important.
Or if the universe kicks your butt during retirement, you can use it to help make ends meet.
All of that is above what financial decisions you make before you qualify for SS.
BTW, the US Treasury owes the SS administration about $2 trillion.
In my last job, if you contributed a minimum of 2% to the 403b, the company would add another 8%. All you had to do was give up a minor amount of money, and you could be putting away 10% of your salary a year. Many people didn’t do it, and said they needed the 2%. This were the same people who had lunch out every day.The deferred tax programs like the 401's and others were a very good effort to encourage people to actually help themselves while making sound decisions but requiring a little self-sacrifice and planning for themselves. It helped a lot of people who took the responsible and long term look at their life. But most young people who I knew personally had an instant gratification attitude plus the impression that they had lots of time to do "something", but the people that took advantage were helped a lot. At least until the housing crash and inflation stripped some of it. It's like health care, they think uncle sam will come to their rescue and they can spend their income and borrow some more. So the government has actually tried to get people to save, but it's like herding cats. That's why the government has to keep borrowing money, to keep our asses out of foreclosure. Instead of encouraging savings now, they are manipulating how much interest we should pay to borrow more.