BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 100,844
- 36,056
- 2,250
The laws that trump was convicted of breaking have been in existence for a long time. They were put into place after it was shown that those bookkeeping practices gave an unfair advantage to those trying to hide the real purpose of expenditures. Trump and his cabal are upset about the outcome of his trial. That leaves us with one of three choices we must make.
1. Those laws are just, and trump should face up to his responsibilities
That would mean the unfairness those laws were enacted to remedy is still valid.
2. Those laws are unjust and should be stricken from the books.
That would make the practices restricted by those laws acceptable for anybody who wanted to choose to use them.
3. Those laws are just, but Trump should be immune from the laws that everybody should abide because trump is who he is, and he's running for president.
Which of the three options would you choose?
1. Those laws are just, and trump should face up to his responsibilities
That would mean the unfairness those laws were enacted to remedy is still valid.
2. Those laws are unjust and should be stricken from the books.
That would make the practices restricted by those laws acceptable for anybody who wanted to choose to use them.
3. Those laws are just, but Trump should be immune from the laws that everybody should abide because trump is who he is, and he's running for president.
Which of the three options would you choose?