You mean the media MASSIVELY supports it?
No, I mean the people. Let's look at our last folly, Iraq. We had spent the previous decade being afraid of Saddam. South Park even made him a primary villain... Then we get good and scared after 9/11, and both parties start beating the war drum, but we all danced, didn't we.
A few people were against it, but not many.
That would be completely dependent on if they respected our intellectual property.
Intellectual property is not why they are beating us economically.
I don't have a problem with that. I think more needs done, but I'm absolutely on board with that.
Yeah, but that's not what you Trump cultists support. You demonize these poor people who come here to do the shitty jobs we don't want to do, instead of the rich white people who hire them.
No. Never. You want California and New York to decide what happens to "fly over states?" If there is no electoral college, there might as well not be states. City folk don't have a ****'n clue how to farm. Farmers don't have a ****'n clue on how to cheat an election, as an example.
Okay, frankly, if you are going to say things like this, there's not much I can do for you.
First, people in CA and NY don't vote in a monolithic block. 33% of people in CA voted for Trump. In NY, 40% did.
Yes, the places with more people will have more influence because they have MORE PEOPLE.
The problem with the EC- and it has many - is that we end up pandering to the farmers in Iowa, which is why we get these ridiculous policies like Ethanol. Got to do something with that excess corn they keep growing!!!! But because it's an evenly divided "Swing State", people give it more attention than it deserves.