JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,757
- 2,220
I dont fault Elizabeth Warren for her stingy financial dealings that are totally legal, like charging relatives high interest loans, or flipping houses to make her fortune. So many enter Congress as average wealth folks but leave it millionaires ten times over, so why should she be picked out?
But it puzzles me in that the presumed value of adding Warren to the ticket is to get the Sanders supporters to vote Hillary, by trotting out the second best socialist in Congress, which once was Warren.
But how much of Warrens socialist principles will she have to abandon in order to be Hillary's second?
How can Warren still campaign against Wall Street abuse of the capitalist system while she campaigns for the biggest Wall Street whore ever found, worse than Romney ever was?
It would seem that to do this pairing, Warren has to shed her principles that made her useful to the Clintonistas in the first place.
So what are these morons thinking this time? Just how stupid do they think the Dimbocrats are? OK, pretty stupid, but the rest of the public isnt so stupid, especially Sanders supporters. Well, mostly.
But it puzzles me in that the presumed value of adding Warren to the ticket is to get the Sanders supporters to vote Hillary, by trotting out the second best socialist in Congress, which once was Warren.
But how much of Warrens socialist principles will she have to abandon in order to be Hillary's second?
How can Warren still campaign against Wall Street abuse of the capitalist system while she campaigns for the biggest Wall Street whore ever found, worse than Romney ever was?
It would seem that to do this pairing, Warren has to shed her principles that made her useful to the Clintonistas in the first place.
So what are these morons thinking this time? Just how stupid do they think the Dimbocrats are? OK, pretty stupid, but the rest of the public isnt so stupid, especially Sanders supporters. Well, mostly.
Last edited:
