So Today We Believe Every Accusation Against a Male, Bill Clinton Smiles

[Soggy in NOLA]

I'll say it again, Bill's a scumbag. But, at the end of the day, all that shit with the hearings etc. was improper, at best.

You say that now, after the fact. Go **** yourself.

Oh, and congrats, you are the 2nd person in 7 years to make it to my ignore list. I won't have my screen polluted with your dreck and mindless, lame arguments.

 

[miketx]

Proof proof?.

Such as...? What?

what part of that word don't you understand?.

It's not the word I don't understand, it's what you define as "proof". That's what you are refusing to say for obvious reasons. You say you demand "proof"...ok...what kind of proof? Because the first person account of what happened isn't proof enough for you. So what would be proof enough?

Proof is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Which you already know this you just want to ruin this guy without proof. Any person can say that you did something bad to them 20 years ago. That's a first person account, but they have to be able to PROVE IT! Witnesses, video, tape recordings, admission of the accused. What part of proof do you not want to understand?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Proof proof?.

Such as...? What?

what part of that word don't you understand?.

It's not the word I don't understand, it's what you define as "proof". That's what you are refusing to say for obvious reasons. You say you demand "proof"...ok...what kind of proof? Because the first person account of what happened isn't proof enough for you. So what would be proof enough?

Proof is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Which you already know this you just want to ruin this guy without proof. Any person can say that you did something bad to them 20 years ago. That's a first person account, but they have to be able to PROVE IT! Witnesses, video, tape recordings, admission of the accused. What part of proof do you not want to understand?

He gets it, nobody can be that stupid. He is aptly named.

 

[miketx]

Clinton's fooling around was dealt with a couple of decades ago. Moore was kicked out of a mall for perving on little girls, and hasn't answered for it yet.

Rape is not fooling around.

Was Clinton convicted of rape, or did you just pull that out of your ass?

What was moore convicted of?

Being a male non homosexual non tranny non gender whacko conservative.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Proof proof?.

Such as...? What?

what part of that word don't you understand?.

It's not the word I don't understand, it's what you define as "proof". That's what you are refusing to say for obvious reasons. You say you demand "proof"...ok...what kind of proof? Because the first person account of what happened isn't proof enough for you. So what would be proof enough?

Proof is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Which you already know this you just want to ruin this guy without proof. Any person can say that you did something bad to them 20 years ago. That's a first person account, but they have to be able to PROVE IT! Witnesses, video, tape recordings, admission of the accused. What part of proof do you not want to understand?

Remember Reid with his Romney doesn’t pay taxes lie? After the election Reid justified the lie by saying we won didn’t we?

 

[The Derp]

It's hideous to be falsely accused by leftists?

What is it you think is "false", specifically? Because Moore's already admitted that he's pursued, dated, hugged and kissed high school girls.

Are you confusing hideous with heroic? If the far left is baselessly accusing you of something, you are doing something very correctly.

You think it is heroic to lust after high school girls as a 30 year old adult?

 

[Norman]

It's hideous to be falsely accused by leftists?

What is it you think is "false", specifically? Because Moore's already admitted that he's pursued, dated, hugged and kissed high school girls.

Are you confusing hideous with heroic? If the far left is baselessly accusing you of something, you are doing something very correctly.

You think it is heroic to lust after high school girls as a 30 year old adult?

No, it's heroic to receive a leftist false rape accusation. Can you read at all? Apparently not, it was plain obviously put.

Such false accusations prove that you are doing something very right, and especially pissing the correct people off.

 

[The Derp]

Such as proof.

Which entails what? Because in court, a first person account -which is what these women gave- is proof. So if that's not proof enough for you, what is? You keep clumsily dancing around that question because you know you can't answer it...why can't you answer it? Because you're a propagandist and it isn't your job.

So, if you get charged with rape, the state doesn't have to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt that you actually did it? What planet do you live on? This is not Venezuela, we don't convict people with no proof.

No one is bringing charges against Moore. These women aren't pressing charges. Besides, you don't even say what kind of proof you require...the reason is obvious; no amount of proof of any kind will be enough for you because you are a propagandist. It's that simple.

 

[The Derp]

I said it at the time

BULLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT

 

[Weatherman2020]

It's hideous to be falsely accused by leftists?

What is it you think is "false", specifically? Because Moore's already admitted that he's pursued, dated, hugged and kissed high school girls.

Are you confusing hideous with heroic? If the far left is baselessly accusing you of something, you are doing something very correctly.

You think it is heroic to lust after high school girls as a 30 year old adult?

What law was he convicted of violating?

 

[The Derp]

Uncle Joe Creepy Biden is the Dems leading candidate for 2020. The lack of outrage over his decades of actions speaks volumes.

Whatabout your compulsion to whatabout? What's that about? Do you whatabout because you know you're a weakling and you can't have a debate with someone about Moore? Or is it simply your job to whatabout?

 

[The Derp]

Oh, and congrats, you are the 2nd person in 7 years to make it to my ignore list. I won't have my screen polluted with your dreck and mindless, lame arguments.

You can't spell ignorance without ignore.

 

[The Derp]

Oh, and congrats, you are the 2nd person in 7 years to make it to my ignore list. I won't have my screen polluted with your dreck and mindless, lame arguments.

Seriously, what a ******* crybaby! You proclaim to everyone that you're putting me on ignore (yeesh, attention-starved much?) simply because I didn't buy your shit that you were this self-righteous 20 years ago.

LOL! You don't believe these women when they make claims about what happened 40 years ago, so why the **** should I believe you when you make claims about something that happened 20 years ago?????

 

[Weatherman2020]

Uncle Joe Creepy Biden is the Dems leading candidate for 2020. The lack of outrage over his decades of actions speaks volumes.

Whatabout your compulsion to whatabout? What's that about? Do you whatabout because you know you're a weakling and you can't have a debate with someone about Moore? Or is it simply your job to whatabout?

Topic is leftist hypocrisy about accused sexual predators, and you’re doing just fine supporting the OP.

 

[Dragonlady]

Why do some men insist on humiliating their sex by defending bad conduct? These same guys blame "feminists," but they are the ones shooting themselves in the foot by defending those among them who do these sorts of things, showing a total lack of moral standards.

They defend this behaviour because the don’t believe the victims. When women come forward with their stories, they refuse to believe it without evidence. There’s seldom any evidence of abuse or harassment.

But when 5 women come forward with the same story, with nothing to gain in its telling, refusal to believe there’s a problem is indicative of an attitude that women lie, make stuff up, or are only looking for a big payday.

It shows disrespect for the victims, but sexual harassment, groping, grabbing them by the *****, and thinking you have the right to do so isn’t indicative of respect for women in the first place.

The same guys who defend Roy Moore, are the guys who call Weinsteins victims “whores” for going along with what it took to get the job and not have your career ended, at a time when they had no power to do otherwise.

Just because women “went along” with guys like Weinstein doesn’t make them whores. It makes them realists. This is how the system works. Suck it up and get it done cause you ain’t big enough to do jack shit about it.

Marilyn Monroe had a weekly standing “appointment” with a studio executive until the day she signed her first big contract. Women do what they have to. Always have. Doesn’t mean we have to like it but the smart ones know what it takes and where the power lies.

Early on we decide what we will do and what we will walk away from. But those choices have often limited what could be accomplished. Reaching for the stars can get you burned. Badly. But still she persisted.

 

[The Derp]

Proof is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Which would be, what?

Keep in mind, Moore isn't on trial here so this conversation seems to be another attempt to deflect away from the fact that he's a serial creeper. So you have this nasty habit of trying to hijack the conversation to a false standard. How come you do that?

hich you already know this you just want to ruin this guy without proof. Any person can say that you did something bad to them 20 years ago.

Yeah...OK...and? So what's stopping you from doing that?

That's a first person account, but they have to be able to PROVE IT! Witnesses, video, tape recordings, admission of the accused. What part of proof do you not want to understand?

Ah, here we go....finally!

So for witnesses, the WaPo had 30 witnesses that corroborated the accounts of the girls in the story. So already, one of your benchmarks has been met.

Secondly, video? You think there were camera-phones in 1979? Unreasonable and impossible false standard you set there deliberately because you know that no such type of evidence would exist. How would this even happen in 1979 Alabama? Were people walking around with 8mm cameras recording everything?

Tape recordings? Of what? What do you mean? Tape recordings of what, exactly? Don't understand.

Admission of the accused? Huh? Isn't the whole point of the trial to determine that? And this isn't even in a court of law - this is the court of public opinion. SO once again, you're trying to establish a false standard rather than admit you're full of shit. BTW - Moore already admitted to having relationships with these girls after first denying them completely.

So he already changed his story once, on Hannity's show no less...so since he lied when he initially denied having any contact with these girls, why would he be telling the truth about what he did with them?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Why do some men insist on humiliating their sex by defending bad conduct? These same guys blame "feminists," but they are the ones shooting themselves in the foot by defending those among them who do these sorts of things, showing a total lack of moral standards.

They defend this behaviour because the don’t believe the victims. When women come forward with their stories, they refuse to believe it without evidence. There’s seldom any evidence of abuse or harassment.

But when 5 women come forward with the same story, with nothing to gain in its telling, refusal to believe there’s a problem is indicative of an attitude that women lie, make stuff up, or are only looking for a big payday.

It shows disrespect for the victims, but sexual harassment, groping, grabbing them by the *****, and thinking you have the right to do so isn’t indicative of respect for women in the first place.

The same guys who defend Roy Moore, are the guys who call Weinsteins victims “whores” for going along with what it took to get the job and not have your career ended, at a time when they had no power to do otherwise.

Just because women “went along” with guys like Weinstein doesn’t make them whores. It makes them realists. This is how the system works. Suck it up and get it done cause you ain’t big enough to do jack shit about it.

Marilyn Monroe had a weekly standing “appointment” with a studio executive until the day she signed her first big contract. Women do what they have to. Always have. Doesn’t mean we have to like it but the smart ones know what it takes and where the power lies.

Early on we decide what we will do and what we will walk away from. But those choices have often limited what could be accomplished. Reaching for the stars can get you burned. Badly. But still she persisted.

Why do you disrespect the victims of Bill Clinton?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Why do some men insist on humiliating their sex by defending bad conduct? These same guys blame "feminists," but they are the ones shooting themselves in the foot by defending those among them who do these sorts of things, showing a total lack of moral standards.

They defend this behaviour because the don’t believe the victims. When women come forward with their stories, they refuse to believe it without evidence. There’s seldom any evidence of abuse or harassment.

But when 5 women come forward with the same story, with nothing to gain in its telling, refusal to believe there’s a problem is indicative of an attitude that women lie, make stuff up, or are only looking for a big payday.

It shows disrespect for the victims, but sexual harassment, groping, grabbing them by the *****, and thinking you have the right to do so isn’t indicative of respect for women in the first place.

The same guys who defend Roy Moore, are the guys who call Weinsteins victims “whores” for going along with what it took to get the job and not have your career ended, at a time when they had no power to do otherwise.

Just because women “went along” with guys like Weinstein doesn’t make them whores. It makes them realists. This is how the system works. Suck it up and get it done cause you ain’t big enough to do jack shit about it.

Marilyn Monroe had a weekly standing “appointment” with a studio executive until the day she signed her first big contract. Women do what they have to. Always have. Doesn’t mean we have to like it but the smart ones know what it takes and where the power lies.

Early on we decide what we will do and what we will walk away from. But those choices have often limited what could be accomplished. Reaching for the stars can get you burned. Badly. But still she persisted.

Yeah, I think the Weinstein situation is different. He literally can make your career or make sure you never work again. That's despicable. I can see where they didn't come forward.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Why do some men insist on humiliating their sex by defending bad conduct? These same guys blame "feminists," but they are the ones shooting themselves in the foot by defending those among them who do these sorts of things, showing a total lack of moral standards.

They defend this behaviour because the don’t believe the victims. When women come forward with their stories, they refuse to believe it without evidence. There’s seldom any evidence of abuse or harassment.

But when 5 women come forward with the same story, with nothing to gain in its telling, refusal to believe there’s a problem is indicative of an attitude that women lie, make stuff up, or are only looking for a big payday.

It shows disrespect for the victims, but sexual harassment, groping, grabbing them by the *****, and thinking you have the right to do so isn’t indicative of respect for women in the first place.

The same guys who defend Roy Moore, are the guys who call Weinsteins victims “whores” for going along with what it took to get the job and not have your career ended, at a time when they had no power to do otherwise.

Just because women “went along” with guys like Weinstein doesn’t make them whores. It makes them realists. This is how the system works. Suck it up and get it done cause you ain’t big enough to do jack shit about it.

Marilyn Monroe had a weekly standing “appointment” with a studio executive until the day she signed her first big contract. Women do what they have to. Always have. Doesn’t mean we have to like it but the smart ones know what it takes and where the power lies.

Early on we decide what we will do and what we will walk away from. But those choices have often limited what could be accomplished. Reaching for the stars can get you burned. Badly. But still she persisted.

Yeah, I think the Weinstein situation is different. He literally can make your career or make sure you never work again. That's despicable. I can see where they didn't come forward.

Good thing a POTUS doesn’t have the power of a Weinstein.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Why do some men insist on humiliating their sex by defending bad conduct? These same guys blame "feminists," but they are the ones shooting themselves in the foot by defending those among them who do these sorts of things, showing a total lack of moral standards.

They defend this behaviour because the don’t believe the victims. When women come forward with their stories, they refuse to believe it without evidence. There’s seldom any evidence of abuse or harassment.

But when 5 women come forward with the same story, with nothing to gain in its telling, refusal to believe there’s a problem is indicative of an attitude that women lie, make stuff up, or are only looking for a big payday.

It shows disrespect for the victims, but sexual harassment, groping, grabbing them by the *****, and thinking you have the right to do so isn’t indicative of respect for women in the first place.

The same guys who defend Roy Moore, are the guys who call Weinsteins victims “whores” for going along with what it took to get the job and not have your career ended, at a time when they had no power to do otherwise.

Just because women “went along” with guys like Weinstein doesn’t make them whores. It makes them realists. This is how the system works. Suck it up and get it done cause you ain’t big enough to do jack shit about it.

Marilyn Monroe had a weekly standing “appointment” with a studio executive until the day she signed her first big contract. Women do what they have to. Always have. Doesn’t mean we have to like it but the smart ones know what it takes and where the power lies.

Early on we decide what we will do and what we will walk away from. But those choices have often limited what could be accomplished. Reaching for the stars can get you burned. Badly. But still she persisted.

Why do you disrespect the victims of Bill Clinton?

“Drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find.”
―James Carville