So, the Democrat klown kar only has democratic moderators and sponsors

[ThoughtCrimes]

So to you, questions asked to inform the voters regarding the morality and character of a potential President are improper? AND questions of that nature should not be asked of folks like Clinton or Rubio or Trump or Sanders or Trump, or Carson or Trump? Did I mention Trump? Would you give a pass also to the likes of Nixon and LBJ, too? Character matters, and if you cannot see that then you are a fatally flawed individual!

So you think its OK for moderators in a PRESIDENTIAL debate to start a flame war? Pathetic

WTF are you on about! A "flame war" was never stated nor implied, and you only employ that dodge to avoid responding to your illogical and foolish stated/implied assertion that proper character in a potential president should not be examined by the electorate via the "debate" process.

Asking someone about their competitors morality isn't going to start a flame war? WTF

Instead of dodging my response to your post #3 regarding debate questions about a potential president's morality/character in my post #20, why don't you just respond to your initial BS! If you don't believe character should be a factor judged by the electorate in a candidate, then you are in an extremely small minority and a fool!

Now quit trying to around it and respond or STFU!

OMG you dumb fuckin hick. The moderators shouldn't be initiating flame wars. If you think a moderator should, then your standards are in the shitter. My point of this is OBVIOUSLY above your head. Check out post #2 and log out.
Dumbfuck

The topic wasn't flame wars to which I responded in your post #3...it was morality and character, IDIOT. And post #2 is ******* irrelevant, too, shit for brains! You keep dodging that point because you stepped into the deep shit of your own making and you're trying to squirm out of it like the ******* COWARD you are now proving to be! Man up you ******* milksop or STFU!

 

[Valerie]

trump got asked a legitimate question about the seriousness of his candidacy which everyone with half a brain has been asking that same question for months now...

trump and only trump was in control of how he responded to a simple question which was adequately prefaced.

trump fails by playing victim to question(s)... ^

see Republican senator John Kasich's comments on fantasy land politics, if you're interested in knowing what rational people think of Trump's painfully embarrassing candidacy...

 

[TNHarley]

So you think its OK for moderators in a PRESIDENTIAL debate to start a flame war? Pathetic

WTF are you on about! A "flame war" was never stated nor implied, and you only employ that dodge to avoid responding to your illogical and foolish stated/implied assertion that proper character in a potential president should not be examined by the electorate via the "debate" process.

Asking someone about their competitors morality isn't going to start a flame war? WTF

Instead of dodging my response to your post #3 regarding debate questions about a potential president's morality/character in my post #20, why don't you just respond to your initial BS! If you don't believe character should be a factor judged by the electorate in a candidate, then you are in an extremely small minority and a fool!

Now quit trying to around it and respond or STFU!

OMG you dumb fuckin hick. The moderators shouldn't be initiating flame wars. If you think a moderator should, then your standards are in the shitter. My point of this is OBVIOUSLY above your head. Check out post #2 and log out.
Dumbfuck

The topic wasn't flame wars to which I responded in your post #3...it was morality and character, IDIOT. And post #2 is ******* irrelevant, too, shit for brains! You keep dodging that point because you stepped into the deep shit of your own making and you're trying to squirm out of it like the ******* COWARD you are now proving to be! Man up you ******* milksop or STFU!

Dude, WTF are you talking about? What am I running away from? That moderators shouldn't be invoking flame wars?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Please stay on topic. This isn't about the lack of substance. Thanks!

whining about dem mods has substance ?

silly me.

Can you not comprehend the damn point? Good lord you dense ****. Look at post #2

We get it, you're whining; nothing new there.

 

[TNHarley]

Please stay on topic. This isn't about the lack of substance. Thanks!

whining about dem mods has substance ?

silly me.

Can you not comprehend the damn point? Good lord you dense ****. Look at post #2

We get it, you're whining; nothing new there.

If that's what pointing hypocrisy out is, I am fine with that.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS are not Democrats.

No, right.. they're all very conservative.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Instead of dodging my response to your post #3 regarding debate questions about a potential president's morality/character in my post #20, why don't you just respond to your initial BS! If you don't believe character should be a factor judged by the electorate in a candidate, then you are in an extremely small minority and a fool!

Now quit trying to around it and respond or STFU!

Isn't the whole point of you in the demagogue - sociopath party (formerly democratic - socialist) that you reject all morality, character, integrity, and ethics?

 

[TNHarley]

Instead of dodging my response to your post #3 regarding debate questions about a potential president's morality/character in my post #20, why don't you just respond to your initial BS! If you don't believe character should be a factor judged by the electorate in a candidate, then you are in an extremely small minority and a fool!

Now quit trying to around it and respond or STFU!

Isn't the whole point of you in the demagogue - sociopath party (formerly democratic - socialist) that you reject all morality, character, integrity, and ethics?

Just look at the lefts front runner..

 

[TNHarley]

Would the left be ok with Rachel Maddow asking Bernie Sanders if he thought it was presidentially moral she used 3 million dollars of TAX PAYER money to pay her charity employees salaries?
I wouldn't be ok with that

 

[Uncensored2008]

don't the republican candidates and the RNC still believe in personal responsibility this election cycle..?

Don't you of the demagogue - sociopath party believe in journalistic integrity?

 

[amrchaos]

Democratic Debate Schedule (2016 Primary Debates)

IF the Demcorat candidates only have lefty moderators and sponsors to ask them questions at their debates, does that mean the republicans have a right to the same respect?


MORE double standard?

Actually, yes

The party controls the debates. Why the GOP want to debate with Air Americas talking head rejects as moderators is beyond me.

 

[Valerie]

Don't you of the demagogue - sociopath party believe in journalistic integrity?

get a hold of your hysterical self, you unscrupulous scumbagh .. i belong to no party..

 

[TNHarley]

^^

 

[Valerie]

^^

TNH stands for The Nut House??

 

[Uncensored2008]

get a hold of your hysterical self, you unscrupulous scumbagh .. i belong to no party..

Sure.

Just because you are a leftist sycophant who spends your time slandering Republicans while praising democrat - socialists, is no reason to think you are a member of the demagogue - sociopath party...

We believe you, ValeRavi...

 

[TNHarley]

^^

TNH stands for The Nut House??

How clever?

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

WTF are you on about! A "flame war" was never stated nor implied, and you only employ that dodge to avoid responding to your illogical and foolish stated/implied assertion that proper character in a potential president should not be examined by the electorate via the "debate" process.

Asking someone about their competitors morality isn't going to start a flame war? WTF

Instead of dodging my response to your post #3 regarding debate questions about a potential president's morality/character in my post #20, why don't you just respond to your initial BS! If you don't believe character should be a factor judged by the electorate in a candidate, then you are in an extremely small minority and a fool!

Now quit trying to around it and respond or STFU!

OMG you dumb fuckin hick. The moderators shouldn't be initiating flame wars. If you think a moderator should, then your standards are in the shitter. My point of this is OBVIOUSLY above your head. Check out post #2 and log out.
Dumbfuck

The topic wasn't flame wars to which I responded in your post #3...it was morality and character, IDIOT. And post #2 is ******* irrelevant, too, shit for brains! You keep dodging that point because you stepped into the deep shit of your own making and you're trying to squirm out of it like the ******* COWARD you are now proving to be! Man up you ******* milksop or STFU!

Dude, WTF are you talking about? What am I running away from? That moderators shouldn't be invoking flame wars?

This is the third sentence of you post #3:
"Judging morality doesn't belong in a political debate."

That is what I addressed and what you refuse to respond to with your duck, dance and dodge routine dipshit! You tried to change the narrative with your "flame wars" bull shit asshole! That is what the **** you've been running from as I've stated multiple times. You've not even acknowledged what you wrote which I quoted above, but rather deflected with this "flame wars" bullshit. You can play pretend all you want you phony asshole, but your just a ******* dishonest miserable ******* coward!

The electorate is entitled to know something about and make a judgment of the character of any potential President. You opinion to the contrary is simply head-up-your-ass stupid!

 

[TNHarley]

Asking someone about their competitors morality isn't going to start a flame war? WTF

Instead of dodging my response to your post #3 regarding debate questions about a potential president's morality/character in my post #20, why don't you just respond to your initial BS! If you don't believe character should be a factor judged by the electorate in a candidate, then you are in an extremely small minority and a fool!

Now quit trying to around it and respond or STFU!

OMG you dumb fuckin hick. The moderators shouldn't be initiating flame wars. If you think a moderator should, then your standards are in the shitter. My point of this is OBVIOUSLY above your head. Check out post #2 and log out.
Dumbfuck

The topic wasn't flame wars to which I responded in your post #3...it was morality and character, IDIOT. And post #2 is ******* irrelevant, too, shit for brains! You keep dodging that point because you stepped into the deep shit of your own making and you're trying to squirm out of it like the ******* COWARD you are now proving to be! Man up you ******* milksop or STFU!

Dude, WTF are you talking about? What am I running away from? That moderators shouldn't be invoking flame wars?

This is the third sentence of you post #3:
"Judging morality doesn't belong in a political debate."

That is what I addressed and what you refuse to respond to with your duck, dance and dodge routine dipshit! You tried to change the narrative with your "flame wars" bull shit asshole! That is what the **** you've been running from as I've stated multiple times. You've not even acknowledged what you wrote which I quoted above, but rather deflected with this "flame wars" bullshit. You can play pretend all you want you phony asshole, but your just a ******* dishonest miserable ******* coward!

The electorate is entitled to know something about and make a judgment of the character of any potential President. You opinion to the contrary is simply head-up-your-ass stupid!

Good lord you fuckin redneck
Moderators should NOT start flame wars.
Asking someone about someone elses morality has a 50/50 chance of inciting flaming.
Their job is not to judge their competitors but to discus policy and other various things they believe in. Not their personal judgements of another person.
A Presidnetial debaqte should not resemble the 4f on this website.
I am running from nothing, dumbfuck.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Instead of dodging my response to your post #3 regarding debate questions about a potential president's morality/character in my post #20, why don't you just respond to your initial BS! If you don't believe character should be a factor judged by the electorate in a candidate, then you are in an extremely small minority and a fool!

Now quit trying to around it and respond or STFU!

Isn't the whole point of you in the demagogue - sociopath party (formerly democratic - socialist) that you reject all morality, character, integrity, and ethics?

Isn't your uniformed, head-up-your-ass post really ******* unenlightened? I left the corrupt Republican party on Aug 9, 1974 when that ******* crook Nixon resigned rather that being impeached and tried!

That is the very basis of my posts to another regarding the CHARACTER of a Presidential candidate of ANY STRIPE! Do you get all of your exercise jumping to conclusions, asshole? One does not have to settle for the lesser of multiple evils, jerk-off, based solely on the dogma of the tribe non-thinkers align with, dipshit!

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Instead of dodging my response to your post #3 regarding debate questions about a potential president's morality/character in my post #20, why don't you just respond to your initial BS! If you don't believe character should be a factor judged by the electorate in a candidate, then you are in an extremely small minority and a fool!

Now quit trying to around it and respond or STFU!

OMG you dumb fuckin hick. The moderators shouldn't be initiating flame wars. If you think a moderator should, then your standards are in the shitter. My point of this is OBVIOUSLY above your head. Check out post #2 and log out.
Dumbfuck

The topic wasn't flame wars to which I responded in your post #3...it was morality and character, IDIOT. And post #2 is ******* irrelevant, too, shit for brains! You keep dodging that point because you stepped into the deep shit of your own making and you're trying to squirm out of it like the ******* COWARD you are now proving to be! Man up you ******* milksop or STFU!

Dude, WTF are you talking about? What am I running away from? That moderators shouldn't be invoking flame wars?

This is the third sentence of you post #3:
"Judging morality doesn't belong in a political debate."

That is what I addressed and what you refuse to respond to with your duck, dance and dodge routine dipshit! You tried to change the narrative with your "flame wars" bull shit asshole! That is what the **** you've been running from as I've stated multiple times. You've not even acknowledged what you wrote which I quoted above, but rather deflected with this "flame wars" bullshit. You can play pretend all you want you phony asshole, but your just a ******* dishonest miserable ******* coward!

The electorate is entitled to know something about and make a judgment of the character of any potential President. You opinion to the contrary is simply head-up-your-ass stupid!

Good lord you fuckin redneck
Moderators should NOT start flame wars.
Asking someone about someone elses morality has a 50/50 chance of inciting flaming.
Their job is not to judge their competitors but to discus policy and other various things they believe in. Not their personal judgements of another person.
A Presidnetial debaqte should not resemble the 4f on this website.
I am running from nothing, dumbfuck.

The subject was CHARACTER, you ******* IDIOT! Keep running you coward!