Boss 11633182
I've NOT made up any damn thing! I posted what Hans Blix reported... Here is a more extensive account:.
I have edited to the few actual incidents or actions that Dr Blix included in his long lists of reports which contained much more positive words about Iraq's cooperation than negative. This is all Boss has:
{{{ 27 January 2003 (A) "...for some time farfetched allegations have been made publicly that questions posed by inspectors were of intelligence character."
(B) "On a number of occasions, demonstrations have taken place in front of our offices and at inspection sites."
(C-a) "...a
sightseeing excursion by five inspectors to a mosque was followed by an unwarranted public outburst.
(C-b)The inspectors went without any UN insignia and were welcomed
in the kind manner that is characteristic of the normal Iraqi attitude to foreigners. They asked perfectly innocent questions and
parted with the invitation to come again. (C-c) Shortly thereafter, we receive
protests from the Iraqi authorities about an unannounced inspection and about questions not relevant to weapons of mass destruction.
14 February 2003 (D) The Iraqi side has tried on occasion to
attach conditions, as it did regarding helicopters and U-2 planes.
Iraq has not, however, so far persisted in these or other conditions for the exercise of any of our inspection rights. If it did, we would report it.}}}}
That is the summary of Iraq's 'obstruction' and 'harrasment' according to Dr Blix which Boss is declaring is some kind of sane and reasonable justification for disarming Iraq by killing people and getting our people killed instead of doing as Dr Blix recommended as the right way to verify Iraq being disarmed. Keep the inspections going for a short period of time
