VaYank5150
Gold Member
Our government can ban me from smoking in a bar because of the "dangers" of second hand smoke, but they can't ban people from owning as many machine guns as they want? Does that make sense to anyone?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Our government can ban me from smoking in a bar because of the "dangers" of second hand smoke, but they can't ban people from owning as many machine guns as they want? Does that make sense to anyone?
Smoking is not mentioned in the second amendment; not even smoking barrels.
Uncle has no business banning smoking from a place of business, that should be left to the owner to decide.
Banning guns will only keep the good guys from getting them. Criminals and loons prefer their victims unarmed.
Yup. Loads of that down here in Florida as well.
Banning guns will only assure that criminals are the armed element out there. No one expects them to turn in their weapons.
Our government can ban me from smoking in a bar because of the "dangers" of second hand smoke, but they can't ban people from owning as many machine guns as they want? Does that make sense to anyone?
Our government can ban me from smoking in a bar because of the "dangers" of second hand smoke, but they can't ban people from owning as many machine guns as they want? Does that make sense to anyone?
No it doesn't. Smoking should be allowed where the owners of said businesses choose to allow it.
your rights end where others rights begin
Yup. Loads of that down here in Florida as well.
Banning guns will only assure that criminals are the armed element out there. No one expects them to turn in their weapons.
I hear you...all of you on the gun rights side. I do. So, if banning guns or limiting them in some way is not the answer, what is? Or...do we simply accept these tragedies as the norm?
Our government can ban me from smoking in a bar because of the "dangers" of second hand smoke, but they can't ban people from owning as many machine guns as they want? Does that make sense to anyone?
No it doesn't. Smoking should be allowed where the owners of said businesses choose to allow it.
Should is one thing....but our government has already taken my right away from me as well as the business owners' right. So, with the dangers afforded by unfettered access to guns, wouldn't you consider that more of a danger?
Yup. Loads of that down here in Florida as well.
Banning guns will only assure that criminals are the armed element out there. No one expects them to turn in their weapons.
I hear you...all of you on the gun rights side. I do. So, if banning guns or limiting them in some way is not the answer, what is? Or...do we simply accept these tragedies as the norm?
Anyone who would do such a thing is clearly mentally unstable. Start there......
Smoking is not mentioned in the second amendment; not even smoking barrels.
Yup. Loads of that down here in Florida as well.
Banning guns will only assure that criminals are the armed element out there. No one expects them to turn in their weapons.
I hear you...all of you on the gun rights side. I do. So, if banning guns or limiting them in some way is not the answer, what is? Or...do we simply accept these tragedies as the norm?
Medical mistakes cause over 150K deaths in the US every year.. time to ban doctors and of course, Obamacare