- Jun 29, 2013
- 22,736
- 15,004
- 1,405
seems like you have become so poltically vested in the concept that now you are hoping that it really is true that man is responsible for climate change. Is there some victory in there for you? Do you really believe that China, Russia, India, Brazil and other countries that are developing hydrocarbon resources at light speed these days are going to go broke in behalf of an unproven claim?
Now remember that orignally we were told that if we passed a certain PPM....there would be no going back and that all efforts to fix things would be meaningless at that point.
Well....we've passed that PPM mark......so what's the fuss? It's locked in isn't it?
http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/201...-tipping-point-into-reversible-climate-change
But while scientists are confident that tipping points exist in theory, predicting when they might occur is far more difficult. The One Hundred Months campaigners base their calculations on a 2006 analysis in which scientists estimated that once the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere surpasses 400 parts per million (ppm), it's unlikely we'll be able to stabilise global mean surface temperature at two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
Two degrees is the maximum acceptable figure adopted by the European Union as a manageable level of warming, based on IPCC findings, beyond which it becomes unlikely that serious negative effects can be avoided. In calculations like these, greenhouse gas concentration is expressed as carbon dioxide equivalent, which is a way of including all greenhouse gases, not just carbon dioxide. In an IPCC context, the term "likely" refers specifically to a probability of 66-90 per cent.
I can remember not long ago ...four to six years back I think being told that 400 ppm is IT BABY! We must close down all the smoke stacks, read by candle light and depend only on wind and solar or else!
Of course the problem with that idea is that it is no longer worth paying three hundred percent for alternative energy...so called " Green Energy "... and therefore the Green Scammers would be left out of the money. Can't have that no can we? So what do we do?
Well We go out and get ourselves a whole brand new point of no return that's what we do! So now we are told that it's 800 ppm!! WOW....twice the original amount Geeves! Imagine!
So lefty.....is Greenscam wrong when they say 400ppm is ponit of no return...cuz....like...we're there now. If Greenscam was wrong about that...
are they wrong about other things too?
Now remember that orignally we were told that if we passed a certain PPM....there would be no going back and that all efforts to fix things would be meaningless at that point.
Well....we've passed that PPM mark......so what's the fuss? It's locked in isn't it?
http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/201...-tipping-point-into-reversible-climate-change
But while scientists are confident that tipping points exist in theory, predicting when they might occur is far more difficult. The One Hundred Months campaigners base their calculations on a 2006 analysis in which scientists estimated that once the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere surpasses 400 parts per million (ppm), it's unlikely we'll be able to stabilise global mean surface temperature at two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
Two degrees is the maximum acceptable figure adopted by the European Union as a manageable level of warming, based on IPCC findings, beyond which it becomes unlikely that serious negative effects can be avoided. In calculations like these, greenhouse gas concentration is expressed as carbon dioxide equivalent, which is a way of including all greenhouse gases, not just carbon dioxide. In an IPCC context, the term "likely" refers specifically to a probability of 66-90 per cent.
I can remember not long ago ...four to six years back I think being told that 400 ppm is IT BABY! We must close down all the smoke stacks, read by candle light and depend only on wind and solar or else!
Of course the problem with that idea is that it is no longer worth paying three hundred percent for alternative energy...so called " Green Energy "... and therefore the Green Scammers would be left out of the money. Can't have that no can we? So what do we do?
Well We go out and get ourselves a whole brand new point of no return that's what we do! So now we are told that it's 800 ppm!! WOW....twice the original amount Geeves! Imagine!
So lefty.....is Greenscam wrong when they say 400ppm is ponit of no return...cuz....like...we're there now. If Greenscam was wrong about that...
are they wrong about other things too?
