So Kamala Harris was offered to have an interview with Elon Musk on X, she declined.

And that's another thing. Elon Musk was an Epstein John who slept with his underage sex slaves. He has experience at trapping females into looking like bimbos. That's another EXCELLENT reason for Harris to avoid his show like the plague.
K...o...o...k
 
Oh, so she was offered time on X and declined.

She has refused all such offers. She is a mess, is why.


So Kamala Harris was offered to have an interview with Elon Musk on X, she declined.
She was offered an interview to go along with her Time cover, she declined.
She refuses to sit down for an interview with any of the major news organizations, even though they are very friendly, and are all voting for her.
She refused to speak at the bitcoin conference.
She even refused to come to the National Association for Black Journalists event.
She travels with 14 members of the press, but she has yet to actually answer one question without a teleprompter. It has been almost a month since she announced she was running for president and all we have heard is canned speeches that she repeats over and over again that are red directly from a teleprompter.
And the only policy she has come up with is the one she stole from Donald Trump.
This is not a serious person or a serious candidate.



It wouldn’t surprise me if she tried to duck them all the way through the election and with the sympathetic media supporting her she might be able to.
 
Why Harris is hiding from the American people...

fefe059877988b508c3a29041eca1f39.jpg
 
Why would she meet with a billionaire who dislikes her.

This is just so weird. You people.
Yep, you sure would not want to see how she responds being challenged. She’s only running for the position of the POTUS and of course she’ll never be faced with any challenges with that.


She should only sit for interviews with a fawning media with prearranged questions. Softball questions too. Nothing relating to policies and or ideas as to how current problems should be solved.
 
Oh, so she was offered time on X and declined.

She has refused all such offers. She is a mess, is why.


So Kamala Harris was offered to have an interview with Elon Musk on X, she declined.
She was offered an interview to go along with her Time cover, she declined.
She refuses to sit down for an interview with any of the major news organizations, even though they are very friendly, and are all voting for her.
She refused to speak at the bitcoin conference.
She even refused to come to the National Association for Black Journalists event.
She travels with 14 members of the press, but she has yet to actually answer one question without a teleprompter. It has been almost a month since she announced she was running for president and all we have heard is canned speeches that she repeats over and over again that are red directly from a teleprompter.
And the only policy she has come up with is the one she stole from Donald Trump.
This is not a serious person or a serious candidate.



Right now she's not even doing interviews with friendly fire.
 
What? They photographed Elon Musk on Epstein's island. Or his ranch. Whatever. Nobody visited Epstein's party properties for innocent purposes. And certainly not more than once.

You'd be amazed at how many people absolutely cannot take a hint. I've read snippets of books about the Holocaust. At one point before the Holocaust really hit the fan, some Jews were required to house Nazi soldiers in their homes for a few days. The Jews found the Nazis to be aloof and uncommunicative, but nonthreatening. Nonthreatening? They barged into your home, dug their heels in there and treated you like you didn't exist. What part of they HATE you don't you understand? They're professionals who may go about destroying you in an orderly fashion. They're not at liberty to fly off the handle any old time. But eventually obviously, they're going to kill you. Duh.
 
It's a little known fact that BOTH the Democratic and Republican Parties are enemies to blacks at large, but in different ways. The Republicans are notorious for exact-targeting blacks to thwart our attempts at upward mobility, but they're not actually elitists. Their overall economic impact is amicable to working class whites. To get more mileage out of their racism, they must pass the baton to the Democrats. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer under Democratic Presidential administrations, not Republican ones. The combined effect of these alternating political reigns is to create a feudal class hierarchy where blacks are shut out of the upper classes like iron bars. Except a smattering of rogue individuals.
 
Th
It's a little known fact that BOTH the Democratic and Republican Parties are enemies to blacks at large, but in different ways. The Republicans are notorious for exact-targeting blacks to thwart our attempts at upward mobility, but they're not actually elitists. Their overall economic impact is amicable to working class whites. To get more mileage out of their racism, they must pass the baton to the Democrats. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer under Democratic Presidential administrations, not Republican ones. The combined effect of these alternating political reigns is to create a feudal class hierarchy where blacks are shut out of the upper classes like iron bars. Except a smattering of rogue individuals.
That's something that's hard to grasp about the Democrats. Their policies aren't openly hostile towards blacks, but they're well aware that Republican attempts to chip away at civil rights laws are often successful anyway. Therefore if the Democrats keep rubbing salt in the wound by making life EVEN harder for these disenfranchised blacks, they hate us. Even if you adopt the most trusting possible attitude towards the Democrats as a black person, it flies in the face of logic that they are blacks' friends. It cannot POSSIBLY be true.
 
Th

That's something that's hard to grasp about the Democrats. Their policies aren't openly hostile towards blacks, but they're well aware that Republican attempts to chip away at civil rights laws are often successful anyway. Therefore if the Democrats keep rubbing salt in the wound by making life EVEN harder for these disenfranchised blacks, they hate us. Even if you adopt the most trusting possible attitude towards the Democrats as a black person, it flies in the face of logic that they are blacks' friends. It cannot POSSIBLY be true.
Consider the following analogy: your enemy Mr. Republican breaks your leg by blunt force trauma. Your friend Mr. Democrat applies a band-aid to the injury. Not a cast. Just a band-aid. And while he's at it he presses on the fractured bone so hard that he permanently exacerbates the injury to make sure it NEVER heals properly. See what I mean? With friends like Mr. Democrat, who needs enemies?
 
Hmmm. Then how about hiding from ABC, CBS, CNN, CNBC? They would be "mean"to her also?
I'm uncertain why Harris is hiding from all these various networks as you say. I happen to know that the ultra-rich don't watch TV at all. Maybe Harris is garnering support from people who have major lobbying influence before she bothers to razzle dazzle the general public.

Also, unfortunately Howard was originally founded by slaveowners to educate the select blacks they emancipated. Thus the primary mission of these historically black colleges was to convolute the slave system. To the point of obscurity even. This volleying of racist duties between the 2 major political parties is another example of how insidious slavery has become in America.
 
Speaking of collegiate fornication, I briefly attended a prestigious university which attracts an international student body. Bismarck was displeased with my race and my politics, so he sent yet another of his obscure descendants to wash my mouth out with something other than soap. That's a recurring theme amongst his alter egos in that era. Brainstorming alternatives to soap.

Bismarck doesn't front and neither do his agents and disciples. My 5th cousin made blatant racist and elitist comments to my face beforehand. Unbelievably that was part of their strategy. I had a fleeting comment that my braces and inexperience might be a bit risky, but I did so anyway. I didn't do so MALICIOUSLY. I'm just saying I lightly dismissed the metal braces with their sharp edges as cause for concern.
 
Speaking of collegiate fornication, I briefly attended a prestigious university which attracts an international student body. Bismarck was displeased with my race and my politics, so he sent yet another of his obscure descendants to wash my mouth out with something other than soap. That's a recurring theme amongst his alter egos in that era. Brainstorming alternatives to soap.

Bismarck doesn't front and neither do his agents and disciples. My 5th cousin made blatant racist and elitist comments to my face beforehand. Unbelievably that was part of their strategy. I had a fleeting comment that my braces and inexperience might be a bit risky, but I did so anyway. I didn't do so MALICIOUSLY. I'm just saying I lightly dismissed the metal braces with their sharp edges as cause for concern.
Therein Bismarck advised me of the monstrosity of the Civil Rights Movement, which was cleverly concealed with vapid grandstanding for freedom. Martin Luther King was yet another Howard grad puppet activist for covert redneck initiatives. In one of his speeches, he decreed that blacks' love for our oppressors should be primarily impersonal and "spiritual" in nature, as opposed to emotional or erotic. I'm instinctively mainly attracted to guys like my dad who is white, but I'm too phenotypically black to merit exemption from these regulations. Dr. King's mission was to destroy me. End of story.

Which brings me to the writings of yet another German imperialist ancestor of mine. He opined that America and England needed to be overthrown by military force. His first publication coincided with America's abolition of interracial "concubinage". The progression of policies in this vein was easy to anticipate I guess.
 
Therein Bismarck advised me of the monstrosity of the Civil Rights Movement, which was cleverly concealed with vapid grandstanding for freedom. Martin Luther King was yet another Howard grad puppet activist for covert redneck initiatives. In one of his speeches, he decreed that blacks' love for our oppressors should be primarily impersonal and "spiritual" in nature, as opposed to emotional or erotic. I'm instinctively mainly attracted to guys like my dad who is white, but I'm too phenotypically black to merit exemption from these regulations. Dr. King's mission was to destroy me. End of story.

Which brings me to the writings of yet another German imperialist ancestor of mine. He opined that America and England needed to be overthrown by military force. His first publication coincided with America's abolition of interracial "concubinage". The progression of policies in this vein was easy to anticipate I guess.
I have no need of democracy anyway. I believe in the divine right of Kings and stuff like that. To a point. Bismarck ruled Germany by divine ordinance because he's a demigod. Ditto when he presided over the African colonial system. America's electoral system is by no means holy or benign. It's racist.
 
So when you strip away the operatic "spiritual principles" attendant to US race relations, operative principle is that these are a bunch of kidnapping monsters and you have to destroy the damn bitches. Duh.
 
So when you strip away the operatic "spiritual principles" attendant to US race relations, operative principle is that these are a bunch of kidnapping monsters and you have to destroy the damn bitches. Duh.
Moreover, Dr. King's eroticism edict is pointedly violent towards unassimilable biracial people in particular. Automatically, inherently violent. This in turn denotes an organic lack of self-respect on whites' part. So they're not only kidnapping monsters, but their women are loose vaginas, too.
 
Yep, you sure would not want to see how she responds being challenged. She’s only running for the position of the POTUS and of course she’ll never be faced with any challenges with that.


She should only sit for interviews with a fawning media with prearranged questions. Softball questions too. Nothing relating to policies and or ideas as to how current problems should be solved.
But it is Trump who just sat with the fawning media, and did his interview with a man who promised to donate $45 million a month to the Trump campaign......???
 
I'm uncertain why Harris is hiding from all these various networks as you say. I happen to know that the ultra-rich don't watch TV at all. Maybe Harris is garnering support from people who have major lobbying influence before she bothers to razzle dazzle the general public.

Also, unfortunately Howard was originally founded by slaveowners to educate the select blacks they emancipated. Thus the primary mission of these historically black colleges was to convolute the slave system. To the point of obscurity even. This volleying of racist duties between the 2 major political parties is another example of how insidious slavery has become in America.
The reason why multi-centimillionaires never watch TV is because it's education for idiots. Television skewed the whole purpose of the Civil Rights Movement, which can only be accurately deduced by applying scholarly works on related topics. Namely, the Fair Housing Act permits blacks to physically move into historically all-white neighborhoods. However it also activates supply and demand pricing adjustments in the housing market. The heightened market competition for white-owned homes automatically appreciated their market values, and the preexisting white homeowners effortlessly pocket the additional equity. And vice-versa. It further depletes black-owned housing values, and the homeowners hemorrhage funds invested into their most important asset. This effect ultimately outstripped the benefits of blacks' enhanced earning potential, because of the bourgeoisie vs. proletariat principle. In the end, major assets beat day-to-day income.
 
That's another reason why Harris was wise to attend a black undergrad university. At predominantly white colleges such as mine, the white students can rip you a**hole off your head by being confrontationally racist. Then it suddenly hits you that you're surrounded, encompassed all about. No matter what the original motive for founding black colleges or who did it, the majority of students are black. None of the nonblack students will have plans to be confrontationally racist.
 
Back
Top Bottom