So I looked up Richard Spencer

can someone --ANYONE--please post the manifesto/website/etc of Unite the Right?
please prove they are NAZIS of WW2

Look a Charlottesville, moron.
Christ, it was only a year ago.
Do you suppose their dress and symbology is a coincidence?
provide their manifesto/website/policy/etc--Mr Moron
not their dress/etc
you must not be able to READ

Provide a response to my question, dope.
very mature--you responding with insults
I respond to the insult
no--I asked for the manifesto/policy/etc and you are not providing it
you can't answer my question with a question
very silly

Here's a clue, dope. People don't emulate nazis if they don't sympathize with their cause. Especially in a public forum such as Charlottesville.
 
D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?
You are not very smart.

Most white supremacists have no problem with social programs -- their problem is when those programs benefit minorities -- The fact 1930's Germany had national healthcare or whatever social program you hate - that wasn't the reason Nazis are hated -- you idiots keep leaving that part out.

But it is common knowledge for decades that most white supremacists believed that the government is supposed to serve THEM not others -- that is the reason you always hear this BS about "they (minorities) don't deserve it"

That is the reason you can see racists and conservatives in general gladly accepting government handouts because they feel "THEY DESERVE IT"
Exactly the opposite of non-white Democrats.....
 
They are largely bogeymen in the heads of liberals; numbering maybe two thousands but elevated to tens of millions.
White affirmation groups are not sinister but rather conforming to and confirming of a successful code of conduct for life.
Liberals don’t want that info out there, it’s white man oppression to “behave” so they demonize the messenger

Nice try. If your movement is righteous, why do you feel the need to minimize it?

Study: 11 million white Americans think like the alt-right
It is righteous.
 
They are largely bogeymen in the heads of liberals; numbering maybe two thousands but elevated to tens of millions.
White affirmation groups are not sinister but rather conforming to and confirming of a successful code of conduct for life.
Liberals don’t want that info out there, it’s white man oppression to “behave” so they demonize the messenger

Nice try. If your movement is righteous, why do you feel the need to minimize it?

Study: 11 million white Americans think like the alt-right
It is righteous.

Well, then address your retarded brother who is attempting to minimize it.
 
They are largely bogeymen in the heads of liberals; numbering maybe two thousands but elevated to tens of millions.
White affirmation groups are not sinister but rather conforming to and confirming of a successful code of conduct for life.
Liberals don’t want that info out there, it’s white man oppression to “behave” so they demonize the messenger

Nice try. If your movement is righteous, why do you feel the need to minimize it?

Study: 11 million white Americans think like the alt-right
It is righteous.

Well, then address your retarded brother who is attempting to minimize it.
Republicans and right wingers aren't clones like you goons.
 
They are largely bogeymen in the heads of liberals; numbering maybe two thousands but elevated to tens of millions.
White affirmation groups are not sinister but rather conforming to and confirming of a successful code of conduct for life.
Liberals don’t want that info out there, it’s white man oppression to “behave” so they demonize the messenger

Nice try. If your movement is righteous, why do you feel the need to minimize it?

Study: 11 million white Americans think like the alt-right
It is righteous.

Well, then address your retarded brother who is attempting to minimize it.
Republicans and right wingers aren't clones like you goons.

LOL. So he wasn't trying to minimize it? I'm only asking because you didn't address it. You just said some unrelated dumb shit.
 
Case of arriving at some of the same places via different roads, sort of. Would Spencer support universal healthcare once all those dirty blacks and hispanics (in his mind) have access to it as well? Would he support abortion if more white women lined up to have abortions than blacks and hispanics? Nope. He's motivated entirely by race, not principle. He's the other side of the intersectionality coin.

I agree with plenty of the policy positions of the KKK, but for entirely different reasons. And if they were in control of the policies, there's no way they would apply those policies even-handedly. Context matters.
Ok, but how is this guy right wing.......I don't support those ideas EVER....at any time. So he's a racist, but he's not right wing.
the left is in overdrive to classify racism as a right wing thing. if they can demonize a group then place people in that group they somehow equate that to being victorious in some imaginary war.
It looks more like the right is in overdrive to distance themselves from their ugly fringe. You might as well call Antifa rightwing.
 
D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?
Is he and/or his followers currently members of the Democrat, or Republican party?

What is their current party affiliation?

Which party's members currently follow Richard Spencer, et al?

I've heard Trump condemn racism, although he was criticized for not condemning white supremacists fast and hard enough in Virginia.

But it's not enough. No amount of condemnation apparently is. The Left will still brand him a racist.

However, on the other isle, we have Maxine Waters who snuggles up to a racist like Louis Farrakhan who calls white people white devils and Jews vermin.

Yet the media never says anything about it.

So I will ask you, who is the bigger racist, Maxine or Trump?
Trump snuggled up to the white supremacists...very fine people.
 
Spencer is not a leftist...the reasons he supports abortion are racist, not an issue of rights. He clearly identifies with the right and is dpsupported by rw extremists. However he is so repugnant he is rejected by the mainstream conservatives.

You rightests need to quit pawning off your nutters on the left. Own them. They are yours. We have Antifa and the commies.
 
I never looked him up or cared until I watched DSouza's movie. How is this guy right wing?

Richard B. Spencer - Wikipedia

D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

Healthcare
Spencer supports legal access to abortion, in part because he believes it would reduce the number of black and Hispanic people, which he says would be a "great boon" to white people.[121] Spencer supports a national single-payer healthcare system because he believes it would benefit white people.[122][123]

Christianity
Spencer is an atheist,[124] but believes the Christian church previously held some pragmatic value, as Spencer believes it helped unify the white population of Europe. He opposes traditional Christian values as a moral code, due to Christianity being a universalizing religion, and not one based on ethnic and racial ancestry. Spencer references his views on Christianity as being influenced by German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.[125][126][127] Citing Nietzsche's criticism of anti-Semitism and nationalism, Scott Galupo writing for The Week, Sean Illing for Vox, and Jordan Harris for The Courier-Journal have described Spencer's interpretation of Nietzsche's philosophy as incorrect.[128][129][125] Spencer's Radix Journal has promoted paganism, running titles such as "Why I am a pagan".[130] Spencer has also described himself as a "cultural Christian."[131]
Lol, first I don't believe you had to look him up to know all about him. Second, he's yours. Take out your own trash.
 
Case of arriving at some of the same places via different roads, sort of. Would Spencer support universal healthcare once all those dirty blacks and hispanics (in his mind) have access to it as well? Would he support abortion if more white women lined up to have abortions than blacks and hispanics? Nope. He's motivated entirely by race, not principle. He's the other side of the intersectionality coin.

I agree with plenty of the policy positions of the KKK, but for entirely different reasons. And if they were in control of the policies, there's no way they would apply those policies even-handedly. Context matters.
Ok, but how is this guy right wing.......I don't support those ideas EVER....at any time. So he's a racist, but he's not right wing.
the left is in overdrive to classify racism as a right wing thing. if they can demonize a group then place people in that group they somehow equate that to being victorious in some imaginary war.
It looks more like the right is in overdrive to distance themselves from their ugly fringe. You might as well call Antifa rightwing.
Antifa is the left based idiot fringe.
 
D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?
Is he and/or his followers currently members of the Democrat, or Republican party?

What is their current party affiliation?

Which party's members currently follow Richard Spencer, et al?

I've heard Trump condemn racism, although he was criticized for not condemning white supremacists fast and hard enough in Virginia.

But it's not enough. No amount of condemnation apparently is. The Left will still brand him a racist.

However, on the other isle, we have Maxine Waters who snuggles up to a racist like Louis Farrakhan who calls white people white devils and Jews vermin.

Yet the media never says anything about it.

So I will ask you, who is the bigger racist, Maxine or Trump?
Trump snuggled up to the white supremacists...very fine people.
Not giving into the left doesnt mean he snuggles with racists. Kinda binary thinking.
 
Most white supremacists i have met online spout that same stuff.
Who cares if they are right or left wing?
They are ignorant assholes. Period.
Not to mention, both sides have horribly racist people with them. They wash themselves out.
Its time to grow up, America


Indeed this, their unfortunately no shortage of shackle on both sides!
 
He is one the "good people" on both sides...... said Trump
 
15th post
The Nazis killed more Soviets, than they did Jews.

Nazis killed 20 - 30 million Soviets, more than half of them civilians.

This was the biggest genocide in WW2, rather than the Holocaust.

But Hitler is demonized more than Stalin around the world.

There are many reasons for this.

One is that Stalin was the ally of those trying to destroy Hitler, and then once Hitler was vanquished, the winning side got to write the history books.

Secondly, Stalin is far Left wing, something that Hitler was as well and pretty much the rest of the globe currently.

And lastly, Hitler murdered because of race as where Stalin murdered for political power. People tend to think murdering people because of race is far more evil than for political power., myself not being one of them.

Don't forget because Jews think they are the only lives that matter often times, and Jews have an enormous amount of power, and influence in Western society, especially American society.

Sounds to me that you have an issue with Jews.

Do you?

Why would Right-Wing people like Jews, in any way, or form?

Why? Well looking at history, they tend to be socio-economically upwardly mobile.

Why do you think that is and is that a bad thing? I say generating wealth benefits society as a whole.

Also look at Nobel Prize winners. Why are there so many Jews on that list? Again, it is a benefit to society.

Where am I going with this? Well the Bible states that through the Jewish people he would bless all nations. However, those on the Left hate the "rich" and covet them. Is this how you are?

In terms of their politics, you accurately state that most are Left leaning, but then, most are atheists as well. The issue is secularism. If you don't believe God exists, then the position needs to be filled, usually by the state.

That is the issue.

However, the Jewish people have a long, long, history in rejecting their God, which was prophesied.

Shrug, I bet many Jews in Germany voted for Hitler because of his fabulous social programs.

Fascists were correct in identifying Jews, and Capitalists as something of an enemy of the State, and as an enemy of Socially Conservative values.

It's actually even a lot more true, today than back then.

Capitalists are the reason why illegal immigrants, and outsourced jobs against the nation, overwhelmingly.

How much of that is Jewish, is debatable, but I wouldn't really doubt that they're over-represented there too, especially in CEO's who decide to outsource jobs.

One thing is true though, Jews have pushed American society to the Left big time.

1/2 of Democrat funding is by Jews.

Over 1,000 American Rabbis sent a letter welcoming Syrian Refugees.

Hollywood is dominated by Jews.

CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, ACLU, the NYT, Facebook, and Youtube are all controlled by Jews.
 
The Nazis killed more Soviets, than they did Jews.

Nazis killed 20 - 30 million Soviets, more than half of them civilians.

This was the biggest genocide in WW2, rather than the Holocaust.

But Hitler is demonized more than Stalin around the world.

There are many reasons for this.

One is that Stalin was the ally of those trying to destroy Hitler, and then once Hitler was vanquished, the winning side got to write the history books.

Secondly, Stalin is far Left wing, something that Hitler was as well and pretty much the rest of the globe currently.

And lastly, Hitler murdered because of race as where Stalin murdered for political power. People tend to think murdering people because of race is far more evil than for political power., myself not being one of them.

Don't forget because Jews think they are the only lives that matter often times, and Jews have an enormous amount of power, and influence in Western society, especially American society.

Sounds to me that you have an issue with Jews.

Do you?

Why would Right-Wing people like Jews, in any way, or form?

Jews are people. Individuals just like you and me. Why would you find a need to dislike any Jew?

Why is it so difficult for some of you to separate the individuals from the groups they are identified with? Probably, because you are attempting to be loyal to the group that you identify with.

I think Individualists are pretty slow, pretty selfish, and pretty weak.

They don't think in societal, nor group terms, but more about me, mine, and now.

With that said.

A.) Groups do work together, as in sometimes groups tend to work like a greater family with each other for their benefit, or to achieve goals.

B.) Groups tend to splinter together in tensions, as when groups fight, be it in a neighborhood gang war, a real war, a massacre event etc, groups will tend to side with their own.

That's reality.

C.) An extreme form of an Individualist, would even go so far to say don't react to a hostile invader killing your people, just treat them as individuals.

That's pretty weak.

D.) Groups do tend to have different cultural, or genetic tendencies, that's to say that no Blacks don't act like Swedes generally, Blacks tend to be rude, obnoxious, and loud, while Swedes tend to be quiet, and polite.

That's not to say that you can't find a rude, obnoxious, and loud Swede, or a quiet, and polite Black, it's just those are the group tendencies.
 
The Nazis killed more Soviets, than they did Jews.

Nazis killed 20 - 30 million Soviets, more than half of them civilians.

This was the biggest genocide in WW2, rather than the Holocaust.

But Hitler is demonized more than Stalin around the world.

There are many reasons for this.

One is that Stalin was the ally of those trying to destroy Hitler, and then once Hitler was vanquished, the winning side got to write the history books.

Secondly, Stalin is far Left wing, something that Hitler was as well and pretty much the rest of the globe currently.

And lastly, Hitler murdered because of race as where Stalin murdered for political power. People tend to think murdering people because of race is far more evil than for political power., myself not being one of them.

Don't forget because Jews think they are the only lives that matter often times, and Jews have an enormous amount of power, and influence in Western society, especially American society.

Sounds to me that you have an issue with Jews.

Do you?

Why would Right-Wing people like Jews, in any way, or form?
Why is it so difficult for some of you to separate the individuals from the groups they are identified with? Probably, because you are attempting to be loyal to the group that you identify with.

Because White Christians, and Jews are oil, and water, they don't mix.

Both parties in their books speak ill of the other.

Furthermore, a lot of Jews clearly resent Christian values, especially from White people (Their competitors)

This is why over, and over again we see a ton of Jews promoting Liberal values which castrate White Christian values.
 
Back
Top Bottom